Literature DB >> 31888693

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the polish version of the Oxford Shoulder Score in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Agnieszka Bejer1,2, Magdalena Szczepanik3, Jędrzej Płocki2,4, Daniel Szymczyk1, Marek Kulczyk2, Teresa Pop1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a simple and reliable, joint-specific, self-reported outcome measure. It can be applied in patients with shoulder disease other than instability. The purpose of this study was to perform a translation, cultural adaptation of the Polish version of the OSS and to evaluate its selected psychometric properties in patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
METHODS: Sixty-nine subjects participated in the study, with a mean age 55.5 (ranging from 40 to 65 years). The OSS has been translated using the widely accepted guidelines. All patients completed the Polish version of OSS (OSS-PL), the short version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), the Short Form-36 v. 2.0 (SF-36) and the 7-point Global Rating of Change Scale (GRC).
RESULTS: High internal consistency of 0.96 was found using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Reliability of the OSS resulted in Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.99, Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) = 1.14 and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) = 3.15. The validity analysis showed a moderate (General health r = 0.34) to high (Physical role functioning r = 0.82) correlation between the OSS-PL and SF-36 and a high correlation between the OSS-PL and the QuickDASH (r = - 0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: The Polish version of OSS is a reliable and valid, self-reported questionnaire, which can be applied in patients with a rotator cuff tear undergoing reconstruction surgery. The very good psychometric properties of the Polish version of the OSS indicate that it can be used in clinical practice and scientific research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oxford shoulder score; Patient-reported outcomes; Reliability; Rotator cuff; Shoulder; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31888693      PMCID: PMC6937923          DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1263-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes        ISSN: 1477-7525            Impact factor:   3.186


  28 in total

1.  Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches.

Authors:  Dorcas E Beaton; James G Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The Oxford shoulder score revisited.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Katherine Rogers; Ray Fitzpatrick; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Evidence of genetic variations associated with rotator cuff disease.

Authors:  Geraldo da Rocha Motta; Marcus Vinícius Amaral; Eduardo Rezende; Rafael Pitta; Thays Cristine dos Santos Vieira; Maria Eugenia Leite Duarte; Alexandre Rezende Vieira; Priscila Ladeira Casado
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford Shoulder Score.

Authors:  Thomas Berendes; Peter Pilot; Jaap Willems; Hennie Verburg; Ron te Slaa
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Change: A Comparison Between 2 Shoulder Outcome Measures.

Authors:  David Høyrup Christiansen; Poul Frost; Deborah Falla; Jens Peder Haahr; Lars Henrik Frich; Susanne Wulff Svendsen
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Donald L Patrick; Jordi Alonso; Paul W Stratford; Dirk L Knol; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-07

8.  Spanish cultural adaptation and validation of the shoulder pain and disability index, and the oxford shoulder score after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  María Torres-Lacomba; Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez; Virginia Prieto-Gómez; Soraya Pacheco-da-Costa; María José Yuste-Sánchez; Beatriz Navarro-Brazález; Carlos Gutiérrez-Ortega
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine.

Authors:  Siny Tsang; Colin F Royse; Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017-05

10.  Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Oxford shoulder score.

Authors:  Ximing Xu; Fei Wang; Xiaolin Wang; Xianzhao Wei; Zimin Wang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Chinese version of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form questionnaire, patient self-report section: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation study.

Authors:  Tung-Hee Albert Tie; Chih-Kai Hong; Illich Chua; Fa-Chuan Kuan; Wei-Ren Su; Kai-Lan Hsu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 2.  Psychometric analysis of the questionnaires for the assessment of upper limbs available in their Italian version: a systematic review of the structural and psychometric characteristics.

Authors:  Luca Barni; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Jose Merchan-Baeza; Marco Freddolini
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Development and Validation of a Simplified Chinese Version and a Face-Scale Version of the Oxford Shoulder Score: A 2-Center Prospective Study.

Authors:  Wu Xu; Kailun Wu; Stephen Roche; Weili Fu; Lixin Huang; Michael F G Held; Jiong Jiong Guo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-21

Review 4.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08

5.  Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Nepali version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale: a methodological study.

Authors:  Shambhu P Adhikari; Rubee Dev; Jayana N Shrestha
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.186

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.