Literature DB >> 8682827

Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery.

J Dawson1, R Fitzpatrick, A Carr.   

Abstract

We developed a 12-item questionnaire for completion by patients having shoulder operations other than stabilisation. A prospective study of 111 patients was undertaken before operation and at follow-up six months later. Each patient completed the new questionnaire and the SF36 form. Some filled in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). An orthopaedic surgeon assessed the Constant shoulder score. The single score derived from the questionnaire had a high internal consistency. Reproducibility, examined by test-retest reliability, was found to be satisfactory. The validity of the questionnaire was established by obtaining significant correlations in the expected direction with the Constant score and the relevant scales of the SF36 and the HAQ. Sensitivity to change was assessed by analysing the differences between the preoperative scores and those at follow-up. Changes in scores were compared with the patients' responses to postoperative questions about their condition. The standardised effect size for the new questionnaire compared favourably with that for the SF36 and the HAQ. The new questionnaire was the most efficient in distinguishing patients who said that their shoulder was much better from all other patients. The shoulder questionnaire provides a measure of outcome for shoulder operations which is short, practical, reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically important changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8682827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  184 in total

1.  The range of the Oxford Shoulder Score in the asymptomatic population: a marker for post-operative improvement.

Authors:  F Younis; J Sultan; S Dix; P J Hughes
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Shoulder outcome measures: is there a right answer?

Authors:  James E Beastall; Shona Fielding; Eva Christie; Alan J Johnstone
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  An analysis of outcome of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair using subjective and objective scoring tools.

Authors:  T Colegate-Stone; R Allom; A Tavakkolizadeh; J Sinha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Critical appraisal of subjective outcome measures used in the assessment of shoulder disability.

Authors:  Aravind S Desai; Asterios Dramis; Anthony J Hearnden
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  The management of secondary frozen shoulder after anterior shoulder dislocation - The results of manipulation under anaesthesia and injection.

Authors:  Hideki Nagata; William J C Thomas; David A Woods
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-16

6.  Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Helen Doll; Irene Boller; Ray Fitzpatrick; Christopher Little; Jonathan Rees; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Pain and function in eight hundred and fifty nine patients comparing shoulder hemiprostheses, resurfacing prostheses, reversed total and conventional total prostheses.

Authors:  Bjørg-Tilde S Fevang; Stein H L Lygre; Glenn Bertelsen; Arne Skredderstuen; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Long-term follow-up of the Copeland mark III shoulder resurfacing hemi-arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul Rai; Owain Davies; Jon Wand; Ewan Bigsby
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-01

9.  Difference in clinical outcome between total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty used in hemiarthroplasty revision surgery.

Authors:  Bas Pieter Hartel; Tjarco D Alta; Miguel E Sewnath; Willem J Willems
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

10.  Outcome scores collected by touchscreen: medical audit as it should be in the 21st century?

Authors:  Sean Dixon; Timothy Bunker; Daniel Chan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.