Literature DB >> 22968194

Sensory-based mechanism for delayed motor intention.

Arnaud Badets1, Cédric T Albinet, Yannick Blandin.   

Abstract

Prospective motor learning (PML) can be defined as learning an action to be performed in the future. The privileged retrieval mechanism behind this delayed motor performance remains unknown. From a motor control and learning perspective, we may conceive of two forms of retrieval: a stimulus- and an intention-based control. Retrieval from intention-based control is based on the anticipation of intended sensory effects related to an action in order to select and control the appropriate motor procedure (i.e., the ideomotor mechanism). In contrast, in a stimulus-based control a connection between stimuli-features and their related action-features is stored in the memory and serves as the retrieval mechanism. In this view, action retrieval from external stimuli is based on the detection of events in the environment to perform the intended behaviour (i.e., the sensorimotor mechanism). In this study, we report an advantage in the action retrieval for participants who use an intention-based mode of control in comparison to a stimulus-based control. Furthermore, a control task reveals that the intention-based advantage is specific to PML. Our findings show that PML is benefited by mental anticipation of a sensory effect that is efficiently processed through an ideomotor mechanism to fulfil delayed motor intentions.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22968194     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  4 in total

Review 1.  A goal-based mechanism for delayed motor intention: considerations from motor skills, tool use and action memory.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; François Osiurak
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-10

Review 2.  The ideomotor recycling theory for tool use, language, and foresight.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; François Osiurak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Aftereffects and deactivation of completed prospective memory intentions: A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcus Möschl; Rico Fischer; Julie M Bugg; Michael K Scullin; Thomas Goschke; Moritz Walser
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Thought probes during prospective memory encoding: Evidence for perfunctory processes.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Michelle N Dasse; Ji Hae Lee; Courtney A Kurinec; Claudina Tami; Madison L Krueger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.