Literature DB >> 17296877

The influence of patient adherence on anticoagulation control with warfarin: results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study.

Stephen E Kimmel1, Zhen Chen, Maureen Price, Catherine S Parker, Joshua P Metlay, Jason D Christie, Colleen M Brensinger, Craig W Newcomb, Frederick F Samaha, Robert Gross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Warfarin sodium is a highly efficacious drug, but proper levels of anticoagulation are difficult to maintain. Conflicting data exist on the influence of patient adherence on anticoagulation control.
METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study at 3 anticoagulation clinics to determine the effect of adherence on anticoagulation control. Patients treated with warfarin with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0 were monitored with electronic Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) medication bottle caps. Detailed information was collected on other factors that might alter warfarin response.
RESULTS: Among 136 participants observed for a mean of 32 weeks, 92% had at least 1 missed or extra bottle opening; 36% missed more than 20% of their bottle openings; and 4% had more than 10% extra bottle openings. In multivariable analyses, there was a significant association between underadherence and underanticoagulation. For each 10% increase in missed pill bottle openings, there was a 14% increase in the odds of underanticoagulation (P<.001); participants with more than 20% missed bottle openings (1-2 missed days each week) had more than a 2-fold increase in the odds of underanticoagulation (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.96). Participants who had extra pill bottle openings on more than 10% of days had a statistically significant increase in overanticoagulation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.74).
CONCLUSION: Patients have substantial difficulties maintaining adequate adherence with warfarin regimens, and this poor adherence has a significant effect on anticoagulation control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17296877     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.3.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  70 in total

1.  How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review.

Authors:  Michael T Eaddy; Christopher L Cook; Ken O'Day; Steven P Burch; C Ron Cantrell
Journal:  P T       Date:  2012-01

Review 2.  Factors Affecting Patients' Perception On, and Adherence To, Anticoagulant Therapy: Anticipating the Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Ekta Y Pandya; Beata Bajorek
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  [Management and therapy of atrial fibrillation in geriatric patients].

Authors:  M Gosch; R E Roller; B Böhmdorfer; U Benvenuti-Falger; B Iglseder; M Lechleitner; U Sommeregger; P Dovjak
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 4.  Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Alexander S Gallus; Ann Wittkowsky; Mark Crowther; Elaine M Hylek; Gualtiero Palareti
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Drug adherence in patients taking oral anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Sebastian Ewen; Volker Rettig-Ewen; Felix Mahfoud; Michael Böhm; Ulrich Laufs
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Validation of knowledge and adherence assessment tools among patients on warfarin therapy in a Saudi hospital anticoagulant clinic.

Authors:  Sireen Abdul Rahim Shilbayeh; Wejdan Ali Almutairi; Sarah Ahmed Alyahya; Nouf Hayef Alshammari; Eiad Shaheen; Alya Adam
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-11-30

7.  Randomized trial of lottery-based incentives to improve warfarin adherence.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel; Andrea B Troxel; George Loewenstein; Colleen M Brensinger; Jane Jaskowiak; Jalpa A Doshi; Mitchell Laskin; Kevin Volpp
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Can we predict daily adherence to warfarin?: Results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study.

Authors:  Alec B Platt; A Russell Localio; Colleen M Brensinger; Dean G Cruess; Jason D Christie; Robert Gross; Catherine S Parker; Maureen Price; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Craig W Newcomb; Brian L Strom; Mitchell S Laskin; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  Warfarin therapy: in need of improvement after all these years.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 10.  A biological global positioning system: considerations for tracking stem cell behaviors in the whole body.

Authors:  Shengwen Calvin Li; Lisa May Ling Tachiki; Jane Luo; Brent A Dethlefs; Zhongping Chen; William G Loudon
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.