| Literature DB >> 31886446 |
Daniel L Menkes1, Robert Pierce1.
Abstract
The proper performance of needle electromyography (EMG) requires that the examiner obtain a brief but comprehensive history, perform a directed examination and generate a short differential diagnosis as part of the initial patient encounter. Equally as important is to set reasonable expectations for this study's performance as electronic media do not necessarily portray all of the nuances of an electrodiagnostic study. In addition to these preliminary steps, this minimonograph discusses equipment used in EMG evaluations, EMG examination techniques, muscles commonly sampled, pain reduction techniques, and special considerations that may require study modification such as anticoagulation, lymphedema, obesity and supervening infection. Clinicians performing these studies will maximize useful data collection while minimizing patient discomfort if all of these recommendations are followed.Entities:
Keywords: Electrodiagnosis; Muscle sampling; Needle electromyography; Neuroanatomy; Waveform analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31886446 PMCID: PMC6921208 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2019.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Pract ISSN: 2467-981X
| Concentric Needles | Monopolar Needles | |
|---|---|---|
| Recording area | Smaller (stable) | Larger (variable) |
| Recording properties | Stable | Variable; may polarize |
| Background | Less noise (better common mode rejection) | Noise from surrounding muscles |
| Reference electrodes | Needle shaft | Separate surface electrode |
| Motor unit potentials | Smaller | Larger |
| Motor unit quantitation | More reliable | Less reliable |
| Discomfort | No difference, if disposable | Less than non-disposable |
| Cost | More expensive | Less expensive |