Literature DB >> 21674520

Accuracy of electromyography needle placement in cadavers: non-guided vs. ultrasound guided.

Andrea J Boon1, Theresa M Oney-Marlow, Naveen S Murthy, Charles M Harper, Terrence R McNamara, Jay Smith.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accuracy of needle electromyography is typically ensured by use of anatomical landmarks and auditory feedback related to voluntary activation of the targeted muscle; however, in certain clinical situations, landmarks may not be palpable, auditory feedback may be limited or not present, and targeting a specific muscle may be more critical. In such settings, image guidance might significantly enhance accuracy.
METHODS: Two electromyographers with different levels of experience examined 14 muscles in each of 4 fresh-frozen cadaver lower limbs. Each muscle was tested a total of eight times; four fine wires were inserted without ultrasound (US) guidance and four were inserted under US guidance. Overall accuracy as well as accuracy rates for the individual electromyographers were calculated.
RESULTS: Non-guided needle placement was significantly less accurate than US-guided needle placement, particularly in the hands of less experienced electromyographers, supporting the use of real-time US guidance in certain challenging situations in the electromyography laboratory.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21674520     DOI: 10.1002/mus.22008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of non-guided versus ultrasound-guided injections in cervical muscles: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Alexandre Kreisler; Camille Gerrebout; Luc Defebvre; Xavier Demondion
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Resident Accuracy of Electromyography Needle Electrode Placement Using Ultrasound Verification.

Authors:  Kristopher Karvelas; Craig Ziegler; Monica E Rho
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Ultrasound combined with electrodiagnosis improves lesion localization and outcome in posterior interosseous neuropathy.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Dvorkin Wininger; Neilly A Buckalew; Robert A Kaufmann; Michael C Munin
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  The posterior/medial dry needling approach of the tibialis posterior muscle is an accurate and safe procedure: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Albert Pérez-Bellmunt; Carlos López-de-Celis; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Shane L Koppenhaver; Daniel Zegarra-Chávez; Sara Ortiz-Miguel; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Accuracy of needle placement in cadavers: non-guided versus ultrasound-guided.

Authors:  Jae Sung Yun; Min Jae Chung; Hae Rim Kim; Jae In So; Jung Eun Park; Hyun Mi Oh; Jong In Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-04-24

6.  Added Value of Dynamic EMG in the Assessment of the Equinus and the Equinovarus Foot Deviation in Stroke Patients and Barriers Limiting Its Usage.

Authors:  Isabella Campanini; Michela Cosma; Mario Manca; Andrea Merlo
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Flexor Carpi Radialis Muscle: Anatomic Features and Electromyography Technique Under Ultrasound Control.

Authors:  Fatma Elleuch; Wafa Elleuch; Ahmed Mohameden; Houcem Harbi; Sameh Ghroubi; Habib Elleuch
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-12

8.  Optimal Needle Placement for Extensor Hallucis Longus Muscle: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  In Yae Cheong; Do Kyun Kim; Ye Jeong Oh; Byung Kyu Park; Ki Hoon Kim; Dong Hwee Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-06-29

Review 9.  Needle EMG muscle identification: A systematic approach to needle EMG examination.

Authors:  Daniel L Menkes; Robert Pierce
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2019-10-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.