| Literature DB >> 31884746 |
Svetlana Basov1, David Varssano2, Max Platkov3, Ilan Gabay4, Mordechai Rosner5, Irina Barequet5, Marcel Rattunde6, Joachim Wagner6, Mickey Harlev7, Doron Ofer8, Ilana Nisky9, Yair Dankner10, Abraham Katzir4.
Abstract
Suturing of corneal incisions requires significant skill. We demonstrate a noncontact method that will simplify the bonding process. 5-mm-long penetrating vertical and slanted incisions were made in corneas of eyes, extracted from dead piglets. A fiber-optic laser system was used for laser soldering of the incisions, under close temperature control, using albumin solder. The burst-pressure PB immediately after the soldering was found to be PB ≈ 92 and 875 mmHg, for vertical and slanted incisions, respectively. PB = 875 mmHg is an exceptionally high figure, ≈10 times the clinically acceptable value for sutured incisions. Laser soldering was then performed on penetrating incisions made in the corneas of live healthy piglets, of weight ≈10 Kg. After a healing period, the eyes were extracted, and the corneas were examined by histopathology and by optical coherence tomography. Our method immediately generated watertight and strong bonding without noticeable corneal shape distortion. These results would be beneficial for cataract surgery and for corneal transplantations. The fiber-optic system makes it much easier to bond corneal incisions. In the future, laser soldering could be automated and efficiently used by less experienced surgeons, thereby reducing the workload on the experienced ones.Entities:
Keywords: albumin; cornea; infrared; laser bonding; laser soldering; optical fibers
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31884746 PMCID: PMC7006038 DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.12.128002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Opt ISSN: 1083-3668 Impact factor: 3.170
Fig. 1The laser soldering protocol, using the laser soldering system.
Fig. 2Soldering protocols: (A1) Cross section of a perpendicular (vertical) incision. (A2) Cross section of a slanted incision. (B1) Top view of a linear heating along an incision. (B2) Top view of a zigzag-pattern heating along an incision. The dotted area marks the places where albumin was applied. The circles mark the heated-spot diameter. The broken arrows mark the direction of the heating spot by spot. This figure is not in scale, the cut edges have been moved far apart, for clarity.
Burst-pressure () measured after ex vivo soldering of incisions of length in porcine corneas, using different soldering protocols.
| ID | Bonding method | Eye ID | Eye ID | Eye ID | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Make a vertical incision, spread albumin, solder the cut in a linear motion. | 1 | 69 | 4 | 100 | 7 | 83 | |
| 2 | 84 | 5 | 98 | 8 | 96 | |||
| 3 | 91 | 6 | 95 | | | |||
| 2 | Make a vertical incision, spread albumin, and solder the cut in a zigzag motion. | 9 | 83 | 13 | 98 | 17 | 97 | |
| 10 | 81 | 14 | 81 | 18 | 85 | |||
| 11 | 103 | 15 | 96 | |||||
| 12 | 99 | 16 | 95 | | | |||
| 3 | Make a slanted incision, spread albumin, and solder the cut in a zigzag motion. | 19 | 1025 | 24 | 1350 | 29 | 626 | |
| 20 | 1024 | 25 | 650 | 30 | 800 | |||
| 21 | 1020 | 26 | 420 | 31 | 660 | |||
| 22 | 1130 | 27 | 644 | 32 | 846 | |||
| 23 | 1300 | 28 | 754 |
Fig. 3Each row shows three images of a cross section of a bonded incision: (a) histopathology, (b) OCT at high magnification, and (c) OCT at low magnification. The top row represents a soldered incision in the cornea of piglet-D (Table 2). It was soldered using the slanted incision-zigzag heating protocol. The center row represents welded incision in the cornea of piglet-G (Table 2). It was welded using the slanted incision-zigzag heating protocol. The bottom line represents the cornea of piglet-K (Table 2). This piglet belonged to the control group where a slanted incision was not laser heated.
Experimental results for laser-soldering of piglet corneal-incisions, in vivo.
| Action | Piglet | OCT | Histology |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I solder: slanted incision, zigzag heating | A | 1. Slanted prolonged penetrating cut. | 1. Well-bonded corneal cut. |
| 2. Hyperreflective anterior corneal side, encompassing roughly the outer 40% to 70% of the wound length from the entry at the front corneal surface to the exit at the back corneal surface. | 2. Mildly thinned epithelium at the bonded cut. | ||
| 3. Small area of the posterior stromal hyperreflectivity near the endothelial side of the wound. | 3. The basal cell layer shows mild folding. | ||
| 4. Thin epithelium-to-endothelium stromal scar. | |||
| 5. The scar shows mild hypercellularity and neovascularization. | |||
| | 6. The Descemet’s membrane is disrupted and the gap between its edges is occupied by a triangular scarring with the base toward the inner surface of the cornea. | ||
| B | 1. Same as the OCT results for piglet A. | Same as the histology results for piglet A. | |
| 2. Same as piglet A but only 50% of the wound is encompassed. | |||
| 3. Prolonged posterior stromal hyperreflective area near the wound endothelium. | | ||
| C | 1, 3. Same as the OCT results for piglet A. | Same as the histology results for piglet A. | |
| 2. 40%. | | ||
| D | 1. Same as the OCT results for piglet A. | 1, 2, 3, 4. Same as the histology for piglet A. | |
| 2. 70%. | 5. The scar shows mild hypercellularity and extensive neovascularization. | ||
| 3. Area of the posterior stromal hyperreflectivity near the endothelial side of the wound, bulging into the anterior chamber. | 6. The Descemet’s membrane is disrupted and is covered by endothelium. | ||
| Group-II weld: no albumin, slanted incision, zigzag heating | E | 1, 2. Same as the OCT results for piglet D. | Same as the histology results for piglet D. |
| 3. Minimal posterior stromal hyperreflectivity near the wound endothelium within some localized stromal thinning. | |||
| F | 1, 2, 3. Same as the OCT results for piglet D. | Same as histology results for piglet D. | |
| G | 1, 3. Same as OCT results for piglet D. | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6. Similar to the histology for piglet A. | |
| 2. 50% to 70%. | 3. Not seen. | ||
| Extensive inflammation is present at the cornea peripheral to the bonded perforated cut and limbus at this side. | |||
| H | Experimental failure | Experimental failure | |
| Group-III control: slanted cut, no albumin, no laser heating. | I | 1. Same as the OCT results for piglet D. | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6. Similar to the histology for piglet A. |
| 2. 20% to 30%. | 3. Not seen. | ||
| 3. Same as the OCT results for piglet D, with slight bulging into the anterior chamber. | There is adhesion between the inner surface of the scar and the anterior part of the iris. | ||
| J | 1, 2, 3. Same as the OCT results for piglet I, | Same as the histology results for piglet I. | |
| K | 1, 2, 3. Same as the OCT results for piglet I. | Same as the histology results for piglet I. | |
| Massive excess hyperreflective tissue bulging into the anterior chamber, anterior to a separate defined anterior chamber structure, separated from the cornea by a thin membranous limit. | |||
| L | 1, 2. Same as the OCT results for piglet I. | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Similar to the histology for piglet A. | |
| 3. Same as the OCT results for piglet D. | 6. Same as the histology results for piglet D. |