Literature DB >> 31883013

Measuring Cigarette Smoking Risk Perceptions.

Annette R Kaufman1, Jenny E Twesten2, Jerry Suls1, Kevin D McCaul3, Jamie S Ostroff4, Rebecca A Ferrer1, Noel T Brewer5,6, Linda D Cameron7, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher8, Jennifer L Hay4, Elyse R Park9,10, Ellen Peters11, David R Strong12,13, Erika A Waters14, Neil D Weinstein15, Paul D Windschitl16, William M P Klein1.   

Abstract

Risk perception is an important construct in many health behavior theories. Smoking risk perceptions are thoughts and feelings about the harms associated with cigarette smoking. Wide variation in the terminology, definition, and assessment of this construct makes it difficult to draw conclusions about the associations of risk perceptions with smoking behaviors. To understand optimal methods of assessing adults' cigarette smoking risk perceptions (among both smokers and nonsmokers), we reviewed best practices from the tobacco control literature, and where gaps were identified, we looked more broadly to the research on risk perceptions in other health domains. Based on this review, we suggest assessments of risk perceptions (1) about multiple smoking-related health harms, (2) about harms over a specific timeframe, and (3) for the person affected by the harm. For the measurement of perceived likelihood in particular (ie, the perceived chance of harm from smoking based largely on deliberative thought), we suggest including (4) unconditional and conditional items (stipulating smoking behavior) and (5) absolute and comparative items and including (6) comparisons to specific populations through (7) direct and indirect assessments. We also suggest including (8) experiential (ostensibly automatic, somatic perceptions of vulnerability to a harm) and affective (emotional reactions to a potential harm) risk perception items. We also offer suggestions for (9) response options and (10) the assessment of risk perception at multiple time points. Researchers can use this resource to inform the selection, use, and future development of smoking risk perception measures. IMPLICATIONS: Incorporating the measurement suggestions for cigarette smoking risk perceptions that are presented will help researchers select items most appropriate for their research questions and will contribute to greater consistency in the assessment of smoking risk perceptions among adults.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved.For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31883013      PMCID: PMC7755137          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  53 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Risk perception and smoking behavior in medically ill smokers: a prospective study.

Authors:  Belinda Borrelli; Rashelle B Hayes; Shira Dunsiger; Joseph L Fava
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Gretchen B Chapman; Frederick X Gibbons; Meg Gerrard; Kevin D McCaul; Neil D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  The Relationship Between Young Adult Smokers' Beliefs About Nicotine Addiction and Smoking-Related Affect and Cognitions.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Eva Janssen; Annette R Kaufman; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno; Michelle L Stock
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Low Health Literacy and Health Information Avoidance but Not Satisficing Help Explain "Don't Know" Responses to Questions Assessing Perceived Risk.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Elizabeth Schofield; Marc T Kiviniemi; Erika A Waters; Caitlin Biddle; Xuewei Chen; Yuelin Li; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Thinking versus feeling: differentiating between cognitive and affective components of perceived cancer risk.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Liesbeth van Osch; Lilian Lechner; Math Candel; Hein de Vries
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-07-18

7.  Absolute and comparative cancer risk perceptions among smokers in two cities in China.

Authors:  Alexander Persoskie; Qunan Mao; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Bradford W Hesse; Xiaoquan Zhao; Guoming Yu; Yinghua Li; Zihao Xu; Meijie Song; Xueqiong Nie; Paula Kim; Gary L Kreps
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  How risky is it to use e-cigarettes? Smokers' beliefs about their health risks from using novel and traditional tobacco products.

Authors:  Jessica K Pepper; Sherry L Emery; Kurt M Ribisl; Christine M Rini; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-10-28

9.  Predicting adolescent perceptions of the risks and benefits of cigarette smoking: a longitudinal investigation.

Authors:  Holly E R Morrell; Anna V Song; Bonnie L Halpern-Felsher
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Effects of Probabilities, Adverse Outcomes, and Status Quo on Perceived Riskiness of Medications: Testing Explanatory Hypotheses Concerning Gist, Worry, and Numeracy.

Authors:  Evan A Wilhelms; Liana Fraenkel; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-09-01
View more
  13 in total

1.  Longitudinal effects of cigarette pictorial warning labels among young adults.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; Samuel J Simmens; Monique M Turner; W Douglas Evans; Andrew A Strasser; Darren Mays
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-09-23

2.  Mediational Effects on Motivation to Quit Smoking After Exposure to a Cigarette Pictorial Warning Label Among Young Adults.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; Monique M Turner; Samuel J Simmens; W Douglas Evans; Andrew A Strasser; Darren Mays
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2022-07-12

3.  Commitment to protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in Syria: A nationwide cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mosa Shibani; Mhd Amin Alzabibi; Abdul Fattah Mohandes; Humam Armashi; Tamim Alsuliman; Angie Mouki; Marah Mansour; Hlma Ismail; Shahd Alhayk; Ahmad Abdulateef Rmman; Hala Adel Almohi Alsaid Mushaweh; Elias Battikh; Naram Khalayli; Bisher Sawaf; Mayssoun Kudsi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  COVID-19 and Tweets About Quitting Cigarette Smoking: Topic Model Analysis of Twitter Posts 2018-2020.

Authors:  J Lee Westmaas; Matthew Masters; Priti Bandi; Anuja Majmundar; Samuel Asare; W Ryan Diver
Journal:  JMIR Infodemiology       Date:  2022-05-16

5.  Associations of Daily Versus Nondaily Smoking, Tobacco-Related Risk Perception, and Cancer Diagnosis Among Adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

Authors:  Stephanie R Land; Laura Baker; Jacqueline Bachand; Jenny Twesten; Annette R Kaufman; Carolyn M Reyes-Guzman
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 5.825

6.  Dismissing "Don't Know" Responses to Perceived Risk Survey Items Threatens the Validity of Theoretical and Empirical Behavior-Change Research.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Marc T Kiviniemi; Jennifer L Hay; Heather Orom
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-11-23

7.  Smoking-Related Health Beliefs in a Sample of Psychiatric Patients: Factors Associated with the Health Beliefs and Validation of the Health Belief Questionnaire.

Authors:  P V Asharani; Jue Hua Lau; Vanessa Ai Ling Seet; Fiona Devi; Peizhi Wang; Kumarasan Roystonn; Ying Ying Lee; Laxman Cetty; Wen Lin Teh; Swapna Verma; Yee Ming Mok; Siow Ann Chong; Mythily Subramaniam
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Comparison of a General and Conditional Measure of E-Cigarette Harm Perceptions.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Michelle Jeong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Developing and Validating Measures of Absolute and Relative E-Cigarette Product Risk Perceptions: Single Items Can Be Surprisingly Comprehensive.

Authors:  Erin Keely O'Brien; Sabeeh A Baig; Alexander Persoskie
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.825

Review 10.  The State of the Science on Cancer Diagnosis as a "Teachable Moment" for Smoking Cessation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Gabriella E Puleo; Tia Borger; William R Bowling; Jessica L Burris
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.