Literature DB >> 30686857

Effects of Probabilities, Adverse Outcomes, and Status Quo on Perceived Riskiness of Medications: Testing Explanatory Hypotheses Concerning Gist, Worry, and Numeracy.

Evan A Wilhelms1, Liana Fraenkel2, Valerie F Reyna3.   

Abstract

We tested predictions of fuzzy-trace theory that qualitative health status and gist representations (ordinal and categorical) of risks contribute to willingness to start medications, beyond effects of objective risk, emotion (worry), and numeracy. Adults in two experiments were given hypothetical scenarios based on actual medications, varying health status quo (acceptable or unacceptable), adverse event (pneumonia or cancer), and four levels of quantitative risk (from 1/100,000 to 1/100) between subjects. In both experiments, cancer and higher quantitative risk elicited greater worry and risk perceptions and reduced willingness to start a new medication. Willingness to start was also influenced by health status quo. After controlling for other variables, only status quo and gist representations consistently predicted willingness to start in both experiments. Results support an integrated approach to understanding and predicting perceptions of the risks of medications that encompasses numerical cognition, emotions (such as worry), and qualitative gist representations of medical information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fuzzy-trace theory; gist; numeracy; risk communication; side effects

Year:  2018        PMID: 30686857      PMCID: PMC6345391          DOI: 10.1002/acp.3448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0888-4080


  41 in total

1.  Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states.

Authors:  X Badia; M Roset; M Herdman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Testing the internal consistency of the standard gamble in 'success' and 'failure' frames.

Authors:  Adam Oliver
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Numeracy and decision making.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic; C K Mertz; Ketti Mazzocco; Stephan Dickert
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-05

5.  Affect, risk, and decision making.

Authors:  Paul Slovic; Ellen Peters; Melissa L Finucane; Donald G Macgregor
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; G Samsa; B K Rimer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  Decision analysis in patient care.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; M Eccles; D Rovner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments.

Authors:  A J Lloyd
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

9.  A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble.

Authors:  K F Cook; C M Ashton; M M Byrne; B Brody; J Geraci; R B Giesler; M Hanita; J Souchek; N P Wray
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Provision of information about drug side-effects to patients.

Authors:  D C Berry; P Knapp; D K Raynor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Measuring Cigarette Smoking Risk Perceptions.

Authors:  Annette R Kaufman; Jenny E Twesten; Jerry Suls; Kevin D McCaul; Jamie S Ostroff; Rebecca A Ferrer; Noel T Brewer; Linda D Cameron; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher; Jennifer L Hay; Elyse R Park; Ellen Peters; David R Strong; Erika A Waters; Neil D Weinstein; Paul D Windschitl; William M P Klein
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Supporting Health and Medical Decision Making: Findings and Insights from Fuzzy-Trace Theory.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Sarah Edelson; Bridget Hayes; David Garavito
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.749

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.