Literature DB >> 31881357

Behavioral and neural processes in counterconditioning: Past and future directions.

Nicole E Keller1, Augustin C Hennings1, Joseph E Dunsmoor2.   

Abstract

Counterconditioning refers both to the technique and putative process by which behavior is modified through a new association with a stimulus of an opposite valence. Similar to extinction, counterconditioning is considered a form of inhibition that interferes with the expression of the originally learned response without erasing it. But whereas interest in extinction continues to rise, counterconditioning has received far less attention. Here, we provide an in-depth review of counterconditioning research and detail whether counterconditioning is any more effective than extinction at preventing relapse of the originally learned behavior. We consider the clinical implications of counterconditioning, describe recent neurobiological and neuroimaging research in this area, and consider future avenues in need of further investigation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amygdala; Associative learning; Aversive-appetitive interactions; Counterconditioning; Extinction; Pavlovian conditioning; Systematic desensitization

Year:  2019        PMID: 31881357      PMCID: PMC6983350          DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  111 in total

Review 1.  Possible mechanisms for why desensitization and exposure therapy work.

Authors:  Warren W Tryon
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01

2.  Occasional Reinforced Responses During Extinction Can Slow the Rate of Reacquisition of an Operant Response.

Authors:  Amanda M Woods; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2007-02

Review 3.  Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback.

Authors:  Ranganatha Sitaram; Tomas Ros; Luke Stoeckel; Sven Haller; Frank Scharnowski; Jarrod Lewis-Peacock; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Maria Laura Blefari; Mohit Rana; Ethan Oblak; Niels Birbaumer; James Sulzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Latent inhibition.

Authors:  R E Lubow
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Counterconditioning During Reconsolidation Prevents Relapse of Cocaine Memories.

Authors:  Koral Goltseker; Lilach Bolotin; Segev Barak
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Amygdala-ventral striatum circuit activation decreases long-term fear.

Authors:  Susana S Correia; Anna G McGrath; Allison Lee; Ann M Graybiel; Ki A Goosens
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Learning to like disgust: neuronal correlates of counterconditioning.

Authors:  Jan Schweckendiek; Tim Klucken; Christian J Merz; Sabine Kagerer; Bertram Walter; Dieter Vaitl; Rudolf Stark
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Prior fear conditioning and reward learning interact in fear and reward networks.

Authors:  Lisa Bulganin; Dominik R Bach; Bianca C Wittmann
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Gradual extinction prevents the return of fear: implications for the discovery of state.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Carolyn E Jones; Kenneth A Norman; Marie-H Monfils; Yael Niv
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  7 in total

1.  Rewarded Extinction Increases Amygdalar Connectivity and Stabilizes Long-Term Memory Traces in the vmPFC.

Authors:  Nicole E Keller; Augustin C Hennings; Emily K Leiker; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Joseph E Dunsmoor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 2.  Cognitive Remediation in Psychiatric Disorders: State of the Evidence, Future Perspectives, and Some Bold Ideas.

Authors:  Wolfgang Trapp; Andreas Heid; Susanne Röder; Franziska Wimmer; Göran Hajak
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Surprise-induced enhancements in the associability of Pavlovian cues facilitate learning across behavior systems.

Authors:  Inmaculada Márquez; Gabriel Loewinger; Juan Pedro Vargas; Juan Carlos López; Estrella Díaz; Guillem R Esber
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.154

4.  Lessons learned developing and testing family-based interoceptive exposure for adolescents with low-weight eating disorders.

Authors:  Tom Hildebrandt; Deena Peyser; Robyn Sysko
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.861

5.  A Preliminary Test of Novelty-Facilitated Extinction in Individuals With Pathological Anxiety.

Authors:  Shari A Steinman; Joseph E Dunsmoor; Zhamilya Gazman; Yael Stovezky; Olivia Pascucci; Justin Pomerenke; Elizabeth A Phelps; Abby Fyer; H Blair Simpson
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Counterconditioning as Treatment to Reduce Nocebo Effects in Persistent Physical Symptoms: Treatment Protocol and Study Design.

Authors:  Simone Meijer; Henriët van Middendorp; Kaya J Peerdeman; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-13

7.  Evaluation of repeated dosing of a dexmedetomidine oromucosal gel for treatment of noise aversion in dogs over a series of noise events.

Authors:  Margaret Gruen; Beth C Case; James B Robertson; Sharon Campbell; Mira Elina Korpivaara
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.695

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.