Y Nagayama1, S Tanoue2, S Oda3, D Sakabe4, T Emoto4, M Kidoh3, H Uetani3, A Sasao3, T Nakaura3, O Ikeda3, K Yamada5, Y Yamashita3. 1. From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.N., S.O., M.K., H.U., A.S., T.N., O.I., Y.Y.) y.nagayama1980@gmail.com. 2. Diagnostic Radiology (S.T.), Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan. 3. From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (Y.N., S.O., M.K., H.U., A.S., T.N., O.I., Y.Y.). 4. Department of Central Radiology (D.S., T.E.), Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan. 5. Graduate School of Medical Sciences, and Departments of Neurosurgery (K.Y.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation electrodes induce massive artifacts on CT images, deteriorating the diagnostic value of examinations. We aimed to investigate the usefulness and potential limitations of a single-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm in head CT performed in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with deep brain stimulation (bilateral, n = 28) who underwent head CT on a 320-detector row scanner and whose images were reconstructed with and without single-energy metal artifact reduction at the examinations were retrospectively included. The severity of artifacts around electrodes was assessed objectively using SDs and an artifact index. Two radiologists subjectively evaluated the severity of artifacts from electrodes, the visibility of electrode localization and surrounding structures, and overall diagnostic confidence on 4-point scales. Background image quality (GM-WM contrast and image noise) was subjectively and objectively assessed. The presence and location of artifacts newly produced by single-energy metal artifact reduction were analyzed. RESULTS: Single-energy metal artifact reduction provided lower objective and subjective metal artifacts and improved visualization of electrode localization and surrounding structures and diagnostic confidence compared with non-single-energy metal artifact reduction images, with statistical significance (all, P < .01). No significant differences were observed in GM-WM contrast and image noise (all, P ≥ .11). The new artifacts from single-energy metal artifact reduction were prominently observed in patients with bilateral deep brain stimulation at high convexity, possibly induced by deep brain stimulation leads placed under the parietal scalp. CONCLUSIONS: Single-energy metal artifact reduction substantially reduces the metal artifacts from deep brain stimulation electrodes and improves the visibility of intracranial structures without affecting background image quality. However, non-single-energy metal artifact reduction images should be simultaneously reviewed to accurately assess the entire intracranial area, particularly in patients with bilateral deep brain stimulation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation electrodes induce massive artifacts on CT images, deteriorating the diagnostic value of examinations. We aimed to investigate the usefulness and potential limitations of a single-energy metalartifact reduction algorithm in head CT performed in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with deep brain stimulation (bilateral, n = 28) who underwent head CT on a 320-detector row scanner and whose images were reconstructed with and without single-energy metal artifact reduction at the examinations were retrospectively included. The severity of artifacts around electrodes was assessed objectively using SDs and an artifact index. Two radiologists subjectively evaluated the severity of artifacts from electrodes, the visibility of electrode localization and surrounding structures, and overall diagnostic confidence on 4-point scales. Background image quality (GM-WM contrast and image noise) was subjectively and objectively assessed. The presence and location of artifacts newly produced by single-energy metal artifact reduction were analyzed. RESULTS: Single-energy metal artifact reduction provided lower objective and subjective metal artifacts and improved visualization of electrode localization and surrounding structures and diagnostic confidence compared with non-single-energy metal artifact reduction images, with statistical significance (all, P < .01). No significant differences were observed in GM-WM contrast and image noise (all, P ≥ .11). The new artifacts from single-energy metal artifact reduction were prominently observed in patients with bilateral deep brain stimulation at high convexity, possibly induced by deep brain stimulation leads placed under the parietal scalp. CONCLUSIONS: Single-energy metal artifact reduction substantially reduces the metal artifacts from deep brain stimulation electrodes and improves the visibility of intracranial structures without affecting background image quality. However, non-single-energy metal artifact reduction images should be simultaneously reviewed to accurately assess the entire intracranial area, particularly in patients with bilateral deep brain stimulation.
Authors: Simon Lennartz; Kai Roman Laukamp; Victor Neuhaus; Nils Große Hokamp; Markus Le Blanc; Volker Maus; Christoph Kabbasch; Anastasios Mpotsaris; David Maintz; Jan Borggrefe Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Alexander Sitz; Mauritius Hoevels; Alexandra Hellerbach; Andreas Gierich; Klaus Luyken; Till A Dembek; Martin Klehr; Jochen Wirths; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Harald Treuer Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Seung Chol Han; Yong Eun Chung; Young Han Lee; Kwan Kyu Park; Myeong Jin Kim; Ki Whang Kim Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Felix Eisenhut; Manuel Alexander Schmidt; Alexander Kalik; Tobias Struffert; Julian Feulner; Sven-Martin Schlaffer; Michael Manhart; Arnd Doerfler; Stefan Lang Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-05-04