| Literature DB >> 31878114 |
Eleonora Lalli1, Jouciane S Silva1, Cristiana Boi1, Giulio C Sarti1.
Abstract
Affinity capture represents an important step in downstream processing of proteins and it is conventionally performed through a chromatographic process. The performance of this step highly depends on the type of matrix employed. In particular, resin beads and convective materials, such as membranes and monoliths, are the commonly available supports. The present work deals with non-competitive binding of bovine serum albumin (BSA) on different chromatographic media functionalized with Cibacron Blue F3GA (CB). The aim is to set up the development of the purification process starting from the lab-scale characterization of a commercially available CB resin, regenerated cellulose membranes and polymeric monoliths, functionalized with CB to identify the best option. The performance of the three different chromatographic media is evaluated in terms of BSA binding capacity and productivity. The experimental investigation shows promising results for regenerated cellulose membranes and monoliths, whose performance are comparable with those of the packed column tested. It was demonstrated that the capacity of convective stationary phases does not depend on flow rate, in the range investigated, and that the productivity that can be achieved with membranes is 10 to 20 times higher depending on the initial BSA concentration value, and with monoliths it is approximately twice that of beads, at the same superficial velocity.Entities:
Keywords: affinity chromatography; beads; membranes; monoliths; proteins; surface modification
Year: 2019 PMID: 31878114 PMCID: PMC7022333 DOI: 10.3390/membranes10010001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Diameter and height of the chromatographic supports.
| Packed Column | Membrane | Monolith | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.7 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 0.0240 | 1.2 | 0.3 |
Figure 1Cibacron Blue F3GA immobilization reaction on (a) regenerated cellulose membranes and (b) epoxy activated monoliths.
Flow rate (F) and corresponding superficial velocity (v) and residence time (τ) for each chromatographic support.
| Packed Column | Membrane | Monolith | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 78.0 | 1.92 | 0.5 | 7.9 | 0.92 | 1.0 | 53.1 | 0.34 |
| 1.0 | 155.9 | 0.96 | 1.0 | 15.8 | 0.46 | 2.5 | 132.6 | 0.14 |
| 1.2 | 199.6 | 0.75 | 5.0 | 78.9 | 0.09 | 4.0 | 212.2 | 0.09 |
| 1.7 | 265.0 | 0.56 | 10.0 | 157.8 | 0.05 | 5.0 | 265.3 | 0.07 |
Figure 2Comparison of dynamic binding capacity at 10% breakthrough (DBC10%) for the different media as a function of flow rate for initial BSA concentration of (a) 0.5 mg/mL and (b) 1.4 mg/mL.
Figure 3Comparison of DBC10% for the different media as a function of residence time for initial bovine serum albumin (BSA) concentration of (a) 0.5 mg/mL and (b) 1.4 mg/mL.
Figure 4Experimental breakthrough curves as functions of flow rate for initial BSA concentration of 0.5 mg/mL and 1.4 mg/mL in the case of (a,b) membranes, (c,d) monoliths and (e,f) packed column.
Figure 5Comparison of the productivity at 10% breakthrough as a function of superficial velocity for an initial BSA concentration of (a) 0.5 mg/mL and (b) 1.4 mg/mL.