Literature DB >> 31668416

A direct comparison between membrane adsorber and packed column chromatography performance.

Cristiana Boi1, Andrea Malavasi2, Ruben G Carbonell3, Gary Gilleskie3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to compare side by side the performance of packed bed and membrane chromatography adsorption processes for protein purification. The comparison was performed using anion exchange media with the same ligand immobilized on the adsorbing surface, namely the strong Q quaternary ammonium group, R-CH2-N+-(CH3)3, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a model protein. In addition, the stationary phase volume was held constant for each geometry (3 mL) and runs were executed using the same mobile phase superficial velocity. As expected, the packed bed column showed higher equilibrium binding of BSA at 66.9 mg/mL versus 43.04 mg/mL for the membrane adsorber. Dynamic binding capacities were also higher in the packed bed; for example, at 97.5 cm/h, a capacity of 62.8 mg/mL was measured for the packed bed versus 20.7 mg/mL for the membrane adsorber. The higher equilibrium and dynamic capacities of the packed bed are likely due to the higher surface area per unit volume of the resin. However, the maximum productivity for the membrane adsorber was 111 mg/(mL h), a value that was 3.3 times higher than the one of the packed column. The bed utilization - defined as the ratio of the dynamic binding capacity at 10% breakthrough to the saturation binding capacity - was also higher for the packed column at long residence times and lower at short residence times confirming the better performance of membrane chromatography at high flow rates.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding capacity; Chromatography; Membrane adsorber; Packed column; Productivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31668416     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  5 in total

1.  Affinity Membranes and Monoliths for Protein Purification.

Authors:  Eleonora Lalli; Jouciane S Silva; Cristiana Boi; Giulio C Sarti
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24

2.  Zwitterion Co-Polymer PEI-SBMA Nanofiltration Membrane Modified by Fast Second Interfacial Polymerization.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Chiao; Tanmoy Patra; Micah Belle Marie Yap Ang; Shu-Ting Chen; Jorge Almodovar; Xianghong Qian; Ranil Wickramasinghe; Wei-Song Hung; Shu-Hsien Huang; Yung Chang; Juin-Yih Lai
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.329

3.  Electrospun Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) Membranes for Protein Purification.

Authors:  Shu-Ting Chen; Sumith Ranil Wickramasinghe; Xianghong Qian
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Nonwoven Ion-Exchange Membranes with High Protein Binding Capacity for Bioseparations.

Authors:  Solomon Mengistu Lemma; Cristiana Boi; Ruben G Carbonell
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-06

5.  Physicochemical Properties of Membrane Adsorber from Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (PEFB) by Acid Activation.

Authors:  Nur Hidayah; Muthia Elma; Putri Vidiasari Darsono; Isna Syauqiah; Angelica Amenia; Daniel Guntur Laksana Putra; Heru Renaldi Akbar; Nurul Huda; Aulia Rahma
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.