| Literature DB >> 31877823 |
My Kieu Ha1,2, Kyung Hwun Chung1, Tae Hyun Yoon1,2,3.
Abstract
Cellular association of nanoparticles (NPs) and their resultant cytotoxicity are heterogeneous in nature and can be influenced by the variances in NPs' properties, cell types, and status. However, conventional in vitro assays typically consider the administered NP dose and the averaged cellular responses based on the assumption of a uniform distribution of monodisperse NPs in homogeneous cells, which might be insufficient to describe the complex nature of cell-NP interactions. Here, using flow cytometry, we report observations of the heterogeneity in the cellular association of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in A549 cells, which resulted in distinct dose-response relationships and cytotoxicity. Type I and Type II cells were moderately associated with AgNPs but as the cellular AgNP dose increased, Type I cells remained viable while Type II cells became less viable. Type III cells did not have high affinity with AgNPs but were, however, the least viable. Transmission electron microscopic images revealed that the biodistribution and the released Ag+ ions contributed to the distinct toxic effects of AgNPs in different populations. This single-cell dose-response analysis approach enabled the examination of how differently individual cells responded to different cellular NP doses and provided insights into nanotoxicity pathways at a single-cell level.Entities:
Keywords: flow cytometry; silver nanoparticles; single-cell; toxicity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31877823 PMCID: PMC7022517 DOI: 10.3390/nano10010036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Nominal core sizes, hydrodynamic sizes, and zeta potentials of Ag40 NPs and Ag80 NPs. Confidence intervals are the standard deviations of 3 replicate measurements.
| Nanoparticle Type | Nominal Core Size 1 (nm) | Hydrodynamic Size 2 (nm) | Zeta Potential 2 (mV) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DI Water | RPMI Media | ||||||
| 0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | DI Water | RPMI Media | ||
| Ag40 NP | 37 ± 4 | 48.8 ± 0.4 | 45.6 ± 0.3 | 153 ± 25 | 190 ± 22 | 74.7 ± 0.8 | −8.5 ± 0.4 |
| Ag80 NP | 81 ± 9 | 84.4 ± 0.4 | 83.7 ± 0.9 | 108 ± 6 | 137 ± 16 | 32.5 ± 1.5 | −11.7 ± 0.5 |
1 Confidence intervals indicate standard deviations of the size distribution. Nominal core sizes were referenced from manufacturer’s specifications. 2 Confidence intervals indicated standard deviations of 3 replicate measurements.
Figure 1Cells treated with Ag40 nanoparticles (NPs) and Ag80 NPs in comparison with untreated cells. (a) Scatter plots of propidium iodide (PI) uptake against side-scattered (SSC) intensity; (b) histograms of forward-scattering (FSC) intensity; (c) Bar charts of averaged intensities of FSC, SSC and PI uptake in each population. Measurements were performed in 3 replicates. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test was used to calculate statistical significance in comparison with control (*, p < 0.05).
Figure 2Cells treated with Ag+ ions and Ag40 NPs spiked with Ag+ ions in comparison with untreated cells. (a) Scatter plots of PI uptake against SSC intensity; (b) histograms of FSC intensity; (c) bar charts of averaged intensities of FSC, SSC and PI uptake in each population. Measurements were performed in 3 replicates. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test was used to calculate statistical significance in comparison with control (*, p < 0.05).
Figure 3Percentage of dissolved Ag+ ions in dispersions of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). Measurements were performed in 3 replicates. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 4Viability of cells treated with Ag40, Ag80 NPs and Ag+ ions in comparison with untreated cells. (a) Untreated cells; (b) cells treated with Ag40 NPs; (c) cells treated with Ag80 NPs; (d) cells treated with Ag40 NPs spiked with Ag+ ions; (e) cells treated with Ag+ ions. Measurements were performed in 3 replicates. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test was used to calculate statistical significance in comparison with control (*, p < 0.05).
Figure 5Thin-section images of sorted cells from transmission electron microscopy (TEM). (a) Untreated cells; (b) Type I cells; (c) Type II cells; (d) Type III cells. Scale bars in (a) are all 2 µm. Scale bars in (b–d) are 2 µm for large figures and 200 nm for small figures. The yellow arrows indicate the positions of cell-associated AgNPs.