Literature DB >> 24341736

Toxicity mechanisms in Escherichia coli vary for silver nanoparticles and differ from ionic silver.

Angela Ivask1, Amro Elbadawy, Chitrada Kaweeteerawat, David Boren, Heidi Fischer, Zhaoxia Ji, Chong Hyun Chang, Rong Liu, Thabet Tolaymat, Donatello Telesca, Jeffrey I Zink, Yoram Cohen, Patricia Ann Holden, Hilary A Godwin.   

Abstract

Silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) are commonly added to various consumer products and materials to impair bacterial growth. Recent studies suggested that the primary mechanism of antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles is release of silver ion (Ag(+)) and that particle-specific activity of silver nanoparticles is negligible. Here, we used a genome-wide library of Escherichia coli consisting of ∼4000 single gene deletion mutants to elucidate which physiological pathways are involved in how E. coli responds to different Ag NPs. The nanoparticles studied herein varied in both size and surface charge. AgNO3 was used as a control for soluble silver ions. Within a series of differently sized citrate-coated Ag NPs, smaller size resulted in higher Ag ion dissolution and toxicity. Nanoparticles functionalized with cationic, branched polyethylene imine (BPEI) exhibited equal toxicity with AgNO3. When we used a genome-wide approach to investigate the pathways involved in the response of E. coli to different toxicants, we found that only one of the particles (Ag-cit10) exhibited a pattern of response that was statistically similar to that of silver ion. By contrast, the pathways involved in E. coli response to Ag-BPEI particles were more similar to those observed for another cationic nanoparticle that did not contain Ag. Overall, we found that the pathways involved in bacterial responses to Ag nanoparticles are highly dependent on physicochemical properties of the nanoparticles, particularly the surface characteristics. These results have important implications for the regulation and testing of silver nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24341736     DOI: 10.1021/nn4044047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  76 in total

1.  Effects of Humic and Fulvic Acids on Silver Nanoparticle Stability, Dissolution, and Toxicity.

Authors:  Ian L Gunsolus; Maral P S Mousavi; Kadir Hussein; Philippe Bühlmann; Christy L Haynes
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Matrix Linear Models for High-Throughput Chemical Genetic Screens.

Authors:  Jane W Liang; Robert J Nichols; Śaunak Sen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Synergy of silver nanoparticles and aztreonam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms.

Authors:  Marc B Habash; Amber J Park; Emily C Vis; Robert J Harris; Cezar M Khursigara
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Antimicrobial hydrogels: promising materials for medical application.

Authors:  Kerong Yang; Qing Han; Bingpeng Chen; Yuhao Zheng; Kesong Zhang; Qiang Li; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-04-12

5.  Chemical characterisation, antibacterial activity, and (nano)silver transformation of commercial personal care products exposed to household greywater.

Authors:  Maryam Khaksar; Sotirios Vasileiadis; Ryo Sekine; Gianluca Brunetti; Kirk G Scheckel; Krasimir Vasilev; Enzo Lombi; Erica Donner
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2019-09-13

6.  Agglomeration of Escherichia coli with Positively Charged Nanoparticles Can Lead to Artifacts in a Standard Caenorhabditis elegans Toxicity Assay.

Authors:  Shannon K Hanna; Antonio R Montoro Bustos; Alexander W Peterson; Vytas Reipa; Leona D Scanlan; Sanem Hosbas Coskun; Tae Joon Cho; Monique E Johnson; Vincent A Hackley; Bryant C Nelson; Michael R Winchester; John T Elliott; Elijah J Petersen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Patricia A Holden; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Fred Klaessig; Ronald F Turco; Monika Mortimer; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; David Avery; Damià Barceló; Renata Behra; Yoram Cohen; Laurence Deydier-Stephan; P Lee Ferguson; Teresa F Fernandes; Barbara Herr Harthorn; W Matthew Henderson; Robert A Hoke; Danail Hristozov; John M Johnston; Agnes B Kane; Larry Kapustka; Arturo A Keller; Hunter S Lenihan; Wess Lovell; Catherine J Murphy; Roger M Nisbet; Elijah J Petersen; Edward R Salinas; Martin Scheringer; Monita Sharma; David E Speed; Yasir Sultan; Paul Westerhoff; Jason C White; Mark R Wiesner; Eva M Wong; Baoshan Xing; Meghan Steele Horan; Hilary A Godwin; André E Nel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Effects of water chemistry and surface contact on the toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Jun Yi; Jinping Cheng
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Analysis of metallic and metal oxide nanomaterial environmental emissions.

Authors:  Thabet Tolaymat; Amro El Badawy; Ash Genaidy; Wael Abdelraheem; Reynold Swqueria
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 9.297

10.  Repeated dose (28-day) administration of silver nanoparticles of varied size and coating does not significantly alter the indigenous murine gut microbiome.

Authors:  Laura A Wilding; Christine M Bassis; Kim Walacavage; Sara Hashway; Pascale R Leroueil; Masako Morishita; Andrew D Maynard; Martin A Philbert; Ingrid L Bergin
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 5.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.