Literature DB >> 29211907

Evaluation of the hygienogram scores and related data obtained after cleaning and disinfection of poultry houses in Flanders during the period 2007 to 2014.

H Maertens1, K De Reu1, S Van Weyenberg1, E Van Coillie1, E Meyer2, H Van Meirhaeghe3, F Van Immerseel4, V Vandenbroucke5, M Vanrobaeys5, J Dewulf6.   

Abstract

Cleaning and disinfection (C&D) of poultry houses is an essential aspect in farm hygiene management. Adequate performance of the different steps of a C&D protocol and the use of suitable products are key to prevent and control zoonoses and animal diseases. Hygiene monitoring on total aerobic flora through sampling with agar contact plates at different locations of the poultry house results in a hygienogram score that is used to evaluate the proper execution of C&D.This study analyzed the hygienogram scores of 19,739 poultry flocks in Flanders after C&D. Data relating to the C&D protocol, i.e., year, season, husbandry system, production type, cleaning product, sampler, active components of the disinfectant, disinfection time, disinfection temperature, and disinfection responsible, were collected.The average hygienogram score decreased significantly over time, suggesting a general improvement between 2007 and 2014. Differences in scores were found among the husbandry systems, with the barn/aviary system having a significantly better hygienogram score compared to the floor house, furnished cage, and battery. Significantly better scores also were found when a cleaning product was used in the C&D protocol. Disinfection with a peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide combination or formaldehyde gave the best scores. In addition, C&D protocols using ≥2 different disinfectants showed improved results compared to the use of one single disinfectant. Finally, disinfection applied by a specialist contractor resulted in a better score compared to disinfection by the farmer.In conclusion, analysis of the hygienogram scores and related data allowed identifying several factors, resulting in an improvement, which may reduce the total bacterial load in poultry stables and, consequently, the number of zoonotic and pathogenic micro-organisms.
© 2017 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cleaning; disinfection; hygiene monitoring; hygienogram score; poultry farm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29211907     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Individual training for farmers based on results from protein and ATP rapid tests and microbiological conventional cultural methods improves hygiene in pig fattening pens.

Authors:  Céline Heinemann; Isabell Meyer; Franziska T Bögel; Simone M Schmid; Jason J Hayer; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Efficacy of a Biocidal Paint in Controlling Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Improving the Quality of Air and Litter in Poultry Houses.

Authors:  Sara Dzik; Tomasz Mituniewicz; Ariphzan Beisenov
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Bacterial communities in PM2.5 and PM10 inside the cage broiler houses before and after disinfection.

Authors:  M Li; J Zhang; X Zhang; J Tang; M Li; L Jiang; X Yu; H Zhu
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.376

4.  Repeated disinfectant use in broiler houses and pig nursery units does not affect disinfectant and antibiotic susceptibility in Escherichia coli field isolates.

Authors:  H Maertens; E Van Coillie; S Millet; S Van Weyenberg; N Sleeckx; E Meyer; J Zoons; J Dewulf; K De Reu
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Effect of subinhibitory exposure to quaternary ammonium compounds on the ciprofloxacin susceptibility of Escherichia coli strains in animal husbandry.

Authors:  H Maertens; K Demeyere; K De Reu; J Dewulf; D Vanhauteghem; E Van Coillie; E Meyer
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 6.  Are There Effective Intervention Measures in Broiler Production against the ESBL/AmpC Producer Escherichia coli?

Authors:  Evelyne Becker; Michaela Projahn; Elke Burow; Annemarie Käsbohrer
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-05-15

7.  Effect of Different Disinfectants on Bacterial Aerosol Diversity in Poultry Houses.

Authors:  Linlin Jiang; Meng Li; Jinxiu Tang; Xiaoyu Zhao; Jianlong Zhang; Hongwei Zhu; Xin Yu; Youzhi Li; Tao Feng; Xingxiao Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.