Literature DB >> 31873973

Reimbursement of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the US commercial insurance marketplace.

Eric Dietrich1,2, Raj Desai3, Mahek Garg3, Haesuk Park3, Steven M Smith1,3.   

Abstract

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is increasingly recommended for confirming hypertension diagnosis and ongoing hypertension monitoring. However, reimbursement in the United States is variable and low compared with other advanced health care systems. We examined the reimbursement of ABPM and factors associated with successful reimbursement. A retrospective analysis of IBM MarketScan® commercial claims database was conducted for patients ≥18 years with ≥1 ABPM claim from January 2012 to December 2016. The date of first the ABPM claim was used as the index date. Per-beneficiary ABPM episode reimbursements were calculated by aggregating all ABPM-related reimbursements within a 30-day post-index window, considered as an ABPM episode. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of successful reimbursement. Of 20 875 beneficiaries with ABPM claims, 16 920 (81.0%) were reimbursed. The median reimbursement per beneficiary for an ABPM episode was $89 (Inter Quartile Range [IQR], $62, $132), driven primarily by reimbursement for the full procedure (median, $86; IQR, $66, $110). Comparing benefit plan types, consumer-directed health plans provided the highest median reimbursement ($96; IQR, $61, $175). Successful reimbursement was associated with female patient sex (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.11-1.28), having a health maintenance organization (aOR 2.11; 95% CI, 1.82-2.43) or point of service (aOR 2.08; 95% CI, 1.74-2.49) as benefit plan types, claim filing by a specialist (aOR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14-1.40) and services provided at an outpatient hospital (aOR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.35). Among commercially insured Americans, our data suggest significant variability in successful reimbursement. Accordingly, more uniform criteria for ABPM reimbursement may facilitate greater use of guideline-recommended monitoring.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory blood pressure; cost; economics; guidelines; home blood pressure monitor; treatment and diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31873973      PMCID: PMC7011780          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory blood pressure measurement: what is the international consensus?

Authors:  Eoin O'Brien; Gianfranco Parati; George Stergiou
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-11-24

4.  Rates, amounts, and determinants of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring claim reimbursements among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Shia T Kent; Daichi Shimbo; Lei Huang; Keith M Diaz; Anthony J Viera; Meredith Kilgore; Suzanne Oparil; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2014-10-02

5.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Proportion of US Adults Recommended Out-of-Clinic Blood Pressure Monitoring According to the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  John N Booth; Demetria Hubbard; Swati Sakhuja; Yuichiro Yano; Paul K Whelton; Jackson T Wright; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Reimbursement of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the US commercial insurance marketplace.

Authors:  Eric Dietrich; Raj Desai; Mahek Garg; Haesuk Park; Steven M Smith
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Modeled state-level estimates of hypertension prevalence and undiagnosed hypertension among US adults during 2013-2015.

Authors:  Soyoun Park; Cathleen Gillespie; Jason Baumgardner; Quanhe Yang; Amy L Valderrama; Jing Fang; Fleetwood Loustalot; Yuling Hong
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in United States counties, 2001-2009.

Authors:  Casey Olives; Rebecca Myerson; Ali H Mokdad; Christopher J L Murray; Stephen S Lim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Trends and Patterns of Geographic Variation in Cardiovascular Mortality Among US Counties, 1980-2014.

Authors:  Gregory A Roth; Laura Dwyer-Lindgren; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Rebecca W Stubbs; Chloe Morozoff; Mohsen Naghavi; Ali H Mokdad; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reimbursement of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the US commercial insurance marketplace.

Authors:  Eric Dietrich; Raj Desai; Mahek Garg; Haesuk Park; Steven M Smith
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Trends in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring use for confirmation or monitoring of hypertension and resistant hypertension among the commercially insured in the U.S., 2008-2017.

Authors:  Raj Desai; Haesuk Park; Eric A Dietrich; Steven M Smith
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Hypertens       Date:  2020-06-01

3.  Out-of-Pocket Payment for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Commercially Insured in the United States.

Authors:  Raj Desai; Eric A Dietrich; Haesuk Park; Steven M Smith
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.080

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.