Literature DB >> 31230550

Proportion of US Adults Recommended Out-of-Clinic Blood Pressure Monitoring According to the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines.

John N Booth1, Demetria Hubbard1, Swati Sakhuja1, Yuichiro Yano2, Paul K Whelton3, Jackson T Wright4, Daichi Shimbo5, Paul Muntner1.   

Abstract

The 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend out-of-clinic BP monitoring to screen for white coat and masked hypertension among adults not taking antihypertensive medication and white coat effect and masked uncontrolled hypertension among adults taking antihypertensive medication. We estimated the percentage of US adults meeting criteria for out-of-clinic BP monitoring by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline using the 2011 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n=9623). Among US adults not taking antihypertensive medication, 92.6% (95% CI, 90.7%-94.1%) with systolic/diastolic BP ≥130/80 mm Hg met criteria for out-of-clinic BP monitoring to screen for white coat hypertension and 32.8% (95% CI, 30.4%-35.3%) with systolic/diastolic BP<130/80 mm Hg met criteria to screen for masked hypertension. Criteria for out-of-clinic BP monitoring to screen for white coat hypertension were less often met at an older age and did not differ by race/ethnicity or sex. The proportion meeting criteria for out-of-clinic BP monitoring to screen for masked hypertension was higher at an older age, among men versus women and non-Hispanic blacks and whites versus non-Hispanic Asians or Hispanics. Among US adults taking antihypertensive medication, 12.5% (95% CI, 10.5%-14.9%) with systolic/diastolic BP ≥130/80 mm Hg met criteria to screen for white coat effect and 57.4% (95% CI, 52.7%-62.1%) with systolic/diastolic BP<130/80 mm Hg met criteria to screen for masked uncontrolled hypertension. Criteria for out-of-clinic BP monitoring to screen for white coat effect was more commonly met at an older age and among non-Hispanic blacks than non-Hispanic whites and to screen for masked uncontrolled hypertension in older adults and men. In conclusion, ≈103.8 million US adults (45.8%) met the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines criteria for out-of-clinic BP monitoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Heart Association; blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; masked hypertension; white coat hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31230550      PMCID: PMC6675457          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  34 in total

1.  Masked hypertension.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Karina Davidson; William Gerin; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Prognostic value of white-coat and masked hypertension diagnosed by ambulatory monitoring in initially untreated subjects: an updated meta analysis.

Authors:  Sante D Pierdomenico; Franco Cuccurullo
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 3.  Doctors record higher blood pressures than nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Isabella A Horvath; Rod S Taylor; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Barriers to conducting ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring during hypertension screening in the United States.

Authors:  Ian M Kronish; Shia Kent; Nathalie Moise; Daichi Shimbo; Monika M Safford; Robert E Kynerd; Ronan O'Beirne; Alexandra Sullivan; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2017-07-06

5.  Potential U.S. Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Robert M Carey; Samuel Gidding; Daniel W Jones; Sandra J Taler; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Is white-coat hypertension associated with increased cardiovascular and mortality risk?

Authors:  Paul Muntner; John N Booth; Daichi Shimbo; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Prevalence of Masked Hypertension in Untreated and Treated Patients With Office Blood Pressure Below 130/80 mm Hg.

Authors:  Alejandro de la Sierra; José R Banegas; Ernest Vinyoles; Julián Segura; Manuel Gorostidi; Juan J de la Cruz; Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Hertzel C Gerstein; Michael E Miller; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; J Thomas Bigger; John B Buse; William C Cushman; Saul Genuth; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Denise G Simons-Morton; William T Friedewald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.897

Review 10.  White-coat hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and total mortality.

Authors:  Yuli Huang; Weijun Huang; Weiyi Mai; Xiaoyan Cai; Dongqi An; Zhuheng Liu; He Huang; Jianping Zeng; Yunzhao Hu; Dingli Xu
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  4 in total

1.  An Integrated Community-Based Blood Pressure Telemonitoring Program - A Population-Based Observational Study.

Authors:  Ju-Yeh Yang; Yen-Wen Wu; Wenpo Chuang; Tzu-Chun Lin; Shu-Wen Chang; Shou-Hsia Cheng; Raymond N Kuo
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.800

2.  Reimbursement of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the US commercial insurance marketplace.

Authors:  Eric Dietrich; Raj Desai; Mahek Garg; Haesuk Park; Steven M Smith
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Trends in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring use for confirmation or monitoring of hypertension and resistant hypertension among the commercially insured in the U.S., 2008-2017.

Authors:  Raj Desai; Haesuk Park; Eric A Dietrich; Steven M Smith
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Hypertens       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in a Diverse US Population.

Authors:  Brandon K Bellows; Jingyu Xu; James P Sheppard; Joseph E Schwartz; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner; Richard J McManus; Andrew E Moran; Kelsey B Bryant; Laura P Cohen; Adam P Bress; Jordan B King; James M Shikany; Beverly B Green; Yuichiro Yano; Donald Clark; Yiyi Zhang
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.080

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.