| Literature DB >> 31870300 |
Deane N Woruba1,2,3, Jennifer L Morrow4, Olivia L Reynolds5,6,7,8, Toni A Chapman5,6, Damian P Collins9, Markus Riegler10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mass-rearing, domestication and gamma irradiation of tephritid fruit flies used in sterile insect technique (SIT) programmes can negatively impact fly quality and performance. Symbiotic bacteria supplied as probiotics to mass-reared fruit flies may help to overcome some of these issues. However, the effects of tephritid ontogeny, sex, diet and irradiation on their microbiota are not well known.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; Acetobacteraceae; Asaia sp.; Enterobacteriaceae; Sterile insect technique; microbiome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31870300 PMCID: PMC6929413 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1649-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Bactrocera tryoni experimental treatment groups
| Treatment group | Life stage | Colony origin | Larval diet bulking agent | Adult diet | Irradiation | Sex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELNIF | Teneral | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Nil | Irradiated | Female |
| ELNIM | Teneral | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Nil | Irradiated | Male |
| ELNUF | Teneral | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Nil | Unirradiated | Female |
| ELNUM | Teneral | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Nil | Unirradiated | Male |
| HCNUF | Teneral | HIE | Carrot | Nil | Unirradiated | Female |
| HCNUM | Teneral | HIE | Carrot | Nil | Unirradiated | Male |
| ELSIF | Mature | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Sugar only | Irradiated | Female |
| ELYIF | Mature | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Full diet | Irradiated | Female |
| ELSIM | Mature | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Sugar only | Irradiated | Male |
| ELYIM | Mature | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Full diet | Irradiated | Male |
| ELSUF | Mature | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Sugar only | Unirradiated | Female |
| ELYUF | Mature | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Full diet | Unirradiated | Female |
| ELSUM | Mature | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Sugar only | Unirradiated | Male |
| ELYUM | Mature | EMAI-FFPF | Lucerne chaff | Full diet | Unirradiated | Male |
| HCSUF | Mature | HIE | Carrot | Sugar only | Unirradiated | Female |
| HCYUF | Mature | HIE | Carrot | Full diet | Unirradiated | Female |
| HCSUM | Mature | HIE | Carrot | Sugar only | Unirradiated | Male |
| HCYUM | Mature | HIE | Carrot | Full diet | Unirradiated | Male |
Treatment group abbreviations represent treatments for individual samples with the first letter indicating the colony origin of either EMAI-FFPF (E) or HIE (H) from which the pupae were collected, the second letter indicating the larval diets of either carrot (C) or lucerne chaff (L), the third letter identifies the adult diet of either a full adult diet consisting of yeast hydrolysate and sugar (3:1) (Y), sugar only (S) or nil (N) as in the case of tenerals who were not fed, the fourth letter indicates if the pupae were irradiated (I) or unirradiated (U), the fifth letter denotes the sex, either male (M) or female (F). Adult diets were provided in a 1% agar matrix)
Fig. 1Mean of counts of 16S rRNA gene reads by treatment groups. Letter codes are as per Table 1
Fig. 2Rarefaction curves for mature Bactrocera tryoni. Figures to the right of the graph indicate the order of lines as sorted by number of OTUs. Sample name letter codes are as per Table 1
Fig. 3Rarefaction curves for teneral Bactrocera tryoni. Figures to the right of the graph indicate the order of lines as sorted by number of OTUs. Sample name letter codes are as per Table 1
Fig. 4Principal coordinate analysis of (a) weighted UniFrac distances of tenerals, (b) unweighted UniFrac distances of tenerals, (c) Bray-Curtis distances of tenerals, (d) weighted UniFrac distances of matures, (e) unweighted UniFrac distances of matures, and (f) Bray-Curtis distances of matures
Major OTUs (excluding OTUs less than 1%) in teneral and mature adult Bactrocera tryoni and their BLAST hits
| OTU ID | Tenerals | Mature | Combine | Query cover (%) | E value | Identity score (%) | Closest NCBI BLAST hit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reads | Abundance | Reads | Abundance | Reads | Abundance | |||||
| 4,418,165 | 5 | 2.63% | 44,809 | 20.89% | 44,814 | 20.87% | 100% | 0.0 | 99% | |
| 1,122,622 | 8 | 4.21% | 35,835 | 16.71% | 35,843 | 16.70% | 100% | 0.0 | 100% | |
| 3,101,394 | 6 | 3.16% | 33,454 | 15.60% | 33,460 | 15.59% | 100% | 0.0 | 100% | |
| 470,879 | 7 | 3.68% | 32,797 | 15.29% | 32,804 | 15.28% | 100% | 0.0 | 100% | |
| 814,266 | 97 | 51.05% | 25,055 | 11.68% | 25,152 | 11.72% | 100% | 0.0 | 100% | |
| 4,477,719 | 1 | 0.53% | 10,079 | 4.70% | 10,080 | 4.70% | 100% | 0.0 | 99% | |
| 1,108,706 | 2 | 1.05% | 9058 | 4.22% | 9060 | 4.22% | 100% | 0.0 | 100% | |
| 572,750 | 0 | 0.00% | 7304 | 3.41% | 7304 | 3.40% | 100% | 0.0 | 100% | |
| 4,343,005 | 0 | 0.00% | 6554 | 3.06% | 6554 | 3.05% | 100% | 0.0 | 100% | |
Fig. 5Relationship between individual mature Bactrocera tryoni and major bacterial families. Sample name letter codes are as per Table 1
Fig. 6Relationship between individual teneral Bactrocera tryoni and bacterial families. Sample name letter codes are as per Table 1
Fig. 7Relative abundance of bacterial families in teneral and mature Bactrocera tryoni treatment groups represented by 16S rRNA gene sequences after rarefaction of tenerals to 10 sequence reads and mature adults to 5500 sequence reads. Letter codes are as per Table 1