| Literature DB >> 35847076 |
Naima Bel Mokhtar1,2, Marta Catalá-Oltra3, Panagiota Stathopoulou1, Elias Asimakis1, Imane Remmal2, Nikolaos Remmas4, Amal Maurady2,5, Mohammed Reda Britel2, Jaime García de Oteyza3, George Tsiamis1, Óscar Dembilio3.
Abstract
Laboratory adaptation process used in sterile insect technique (SIT) programs can exert a significant impact on the insect-gut microbiome relationship, which may negatively impact the quality and performance of the fly. In the present study, changes in the gut microbiota that occur through laboratory adaptation of two Ceratitis capitata populations were investigated: Vienna 8 genetic sexing strain (GSS), a long-established control line, and a wild population recently introduced to laboratory conditions. The bacterial profiles were studied for both strains using amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA V3-V4 hypervariable region in larvae and in the gastrointestinal tract of teneral (1 day) and adults (5 and 15 days) reared under laboratory conditions for 14 generations (F0-F13). Findings demonstrated the development of distinct bacterial communities across the generations with differences in the bacterial composition, suggesting a strong impact of laboratory adaptation on the fly bacteriome. Moreover, different bacterial profiles were observed between wild and Vienna 8 FD-GSS displaying different patterns between the developmental stages. Proteobacteria, mainly members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, represented the major component of the bacterial community followed by Firmicutes (mainly in Vienna 8 FD-GSS adults) and Chlamydiae. The distribution of these communities is dynamic across the generations and seems to be strain- and age-specific. In the Vienna 8 FD-GSS population, Providencia exhibited high relative abundance in the first three generations and decreased significantly later, while Klebsiella was relatively stable. In the wild population, Klebsiella was dominant across most of the generations, indicating that the wild population was more resistant to artificial rearing conditions compared with the Vienna 8 FD-GSS colony. Analysis of the core bacteriome revealed the presence of nine shared taxa between most of the examined medfly samples including Klebsiella, Providencia, Pantoea, and Pseudomonas. In addition, the operational taxonomic unit co-occurrence and mutual exclusion networks of the wild population indicated that most of the interactions were classified as co-presence, while in the Vienna 8 FD-GSS population, the number of mutual exclusions and co-presence interactions was equally distributed. Obtained results provided a thorough study of the dynamics of gut-associated bacteria during the laboratory adaptation of different Ceratitis capitata populations, serving as guidance for the design of colonization protocols, improving the effectiveness of artificial rearing and the SIT application.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; SIT; core microbiome; medfly; microbial communities; next generation sequencing (NGS)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35847076 PMCID: PMC9283074 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.919760
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Figure 1Overall core bacterial taxa identified in at least 75% of the samples of Ceratitis capitata. Asterisk (*) represents genera identified in as two variants.
Core bacterial taxa determined at each generation of laboratory adaptation of Vienna 8 FD-GSS C. capitata at 75% threshold.
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Klebsiella | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P* | P |
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Moellerella | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | ||||||||||||||||
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Morganella | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | ||||||||||||||
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Providencia | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | ||
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Oceanospirillales | Halomonadaceae | Carnimonas | P | P | P | P | P | ||||||||||||||||||
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Pseudomonadales | Pseudomonadaceae | Pseudomonas | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | |||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Bacillales | Bacillaceae | Geobacillus | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | |||||||||||||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Enterococcaceae | Enterococcus | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P* | P | P* | P | P | P* | P* | P | P | P | ||||||
“P” (Present) represents the identification of taxon at each generation. Asterisk (.
Core bacterial taxa determined at each generation of laboratory adaptation of wild C. capitata at 75% threshold.
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Citrobacter | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | |
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Klebsiella | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P* | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P* | P | P |
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Morganella | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | ||||||||
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Pantoea | P* | P* | P* | P | P* | P* | P* | P* | P* | P* | P* | P* | P* | P | P* | P* | P* | P* | P* | P | P* | P* | ||
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Pluralibacter | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | |
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Providencia | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | ||||
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Oceanospirillales | Halomonadaceae | Carnimonas | P | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Pseudomonadales | Pseudomonadaceae | Pseudomonas | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
| Proteobacteria | Alphaproteobacteria | Acetobacterales | Acetobacteraceae | Acetobacter | P | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Firmicutes | Bacilli | Bacillales | Bacillaceae | Geobacillus | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | |||||||||||||||
“P” (Present) represents the identification of taxon at each generation. Asterisk (.
Figure 2Bacterial community network within the guts of C. capitata larva during laboratory adaptation of Vienna 8 FD-GSS strain. (A) Total number of nodes and clustering coefficient. (B) Total number of negative (red) and positive (green) associations, (C) Chord diagram displaying direct relationship between OTUs at family level. The size of the ribbon is proportional to the weight of the association between the OTUs assigned to the respective segments and the color of the ribbon present in the direction of the interaction. (D) Number of positive and negative associations at genus level.
Figure 3Bacterial community network within the guts of C. capitata teneral during laboratory adaptation of Vienna 8 FD-GSS strain. (A) Total number of nodes and clustering coefficient. (B) Total number of negative (red) and positive (green) associations. (C) Chord diagram displaying direct relationship between OTUs at family level. The size of the ribbon is proportional to the weight of the association between the OTUs assigned to the respective segments and the color of the ribbon present in the direction of the interaction. (D) Number of positive and negative associations at genus level.
Figure 4Bacterial community network within the guts of C. capitata adult during laboratory adaptation of Vienna 8 FD-GSS strain. (A) Total number of nodes and clustering coefficient, (B) Total number of negative (red) and positive (green) associations, (C) Chord diagram displaying direct relationship between OTUs at family level. The size of the ribbon is proportional to the weight of the association between the OTUs assigned to the respective segments and the color of the ribbon present in the direction of the interaction. (D) Number of positive and negative associations at the genus level.
Figure 5Bacterial community network within the guts of C. capitata larva during laboratory adaptation of wild population. (A) Total number of nodes and clustering coefficient. (B) Total number of negative (red) and positive (green) associations. (C) Chord diagram displaying direct relationship between OTUs at family level. The size of the ribbon is proportional to the weight of the association between the OTUs assigned to the respective segments and the color of the ribbon present in the direction of the interaction. (D) Number of positive and negative associations at the genus level.
Figure 6Bacterial community network within the guts of C. capitata teneral during laboratory adaptation of wild population. (A) Total number of nodes and clustering coefficient. (B) Total number of negative (red) and positive (green) associations. (C) Chord diagram displaying direct relationship between OTUs at the family level. The size of the ribbon is proportional to the weight of the association between the OTUs assigned to the respective segments and the color of the ribbon present in the direction of the interaction. (D) Number of positive and negative associations at the genus level.
Figure 7Bacterial community network within the guts of C. capitata adult during laboratory adaptation of wild population. (A) Total number of nodes and clustering coefficient. (B) Total number of negative (red) and positive (green) associations. (C) Chord diagram displaying direct relationship between OTUs at the family level. The size of the ribbon is proportional to the weight of the association between the OTUs assigned to the respective segments and the color of the ribbon present in the direction of the interaction. (D) Number of positive and negative associations at the genus level.
Figure 8Changes in the bacterial community structure associated with the guts of larva, teneral, and adults originated from Vienna 8 FD-GSS (V8) and wild C. capitata stains before laboratory adaptation (F0), at F1 and F11 generations. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) analysis and PERMANOVA test were performed based on GUniFrac dissimilarity matrix.