Literature DB >> 3187004

Whole-body MR imaging and spectroscopy with a 4-T system.

H Barfuss1, H Fischer, D Hentschel, R Ladebeck, J Vetter.   

Abstract

The clinical potential and limitations of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy at 4 T were investigated with the use of a newly constructed system, which has been in use since January 1987. The magnet has a warm bore that measures 1.25 m in diameter, and its homogeneity in a sphere with a diameter of 50 cm is better than +/- 2.5 ppm. It was hypothesized that the improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) afforded by the higher field strength would be useful in reducing imaging time and in improving spatial resolution. In experiments in human volunteers, believed to be the first in which an entire human body was exposed to a magnetic flux density of that magnitude, the subjects were exposed to 4 T for 10-30 minutes. They showed no changes in well-being or heart activity. The expected gain in spectral resolution due to chemical-shift scaling was achieved with the 4-T system, and an improvement in S/N was verified for phosphorus at 34 and 68 MHz. In sodium imaging, the high flux density appears to be useful in reducing imaging time, which should increase the usefulness of sodium imaging in evaluating brain tumors and strokes. In spectroscopy, the increase in flux density improves the quality of the spectra.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3187004     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.169.3.3187004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Clinical high- and ultrahigh-field MR and its interaction with biological systems].

Authors:  A Kangarlu; K T Baudendistel; J T Heverhagen; M V Knopp
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging at ultrahigh fields.

Authors:  Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Imaging at ultrahigh magnetic fields: History, challenges, and solutions.

Authors:  Kamil Uğurbil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The design and test of a new volume coil for high field imaging.

Authors:  H Wen; A S Chesnick; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Progress in Imaging the Human Torso at the Ultrahigh Fields of 7 and 10.5 T.

Authors:  Kamil Uğurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Andrea Grant; Edward J Auerbach; Arcan Ertürk; Russell Lagore; Jutta M Ellermann; Xiaoxuan He; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 6.  3 T: the good, the bad and the ugly.

Authors:  Martin John Graves
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  The road to functional imaging and ultrahigh fields.

Authors:  Kâmil Uğurbil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Is sperm motility maturation affected by static magnetic fields?

Authors:  L Tablado; F Pérez-Sánchez; C Soler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Reducing ghosting due to k-space discontinuities in fast spin echo (FSE) imaging by a new combination of k-space ordering and parallel imaging.

Authors:  David W Carmichael; David L Thomas; Roger J Ordidge
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project.

Authors:  Kamil Uğurbil; Junqian Xu; Edward J Auerbach; Steen Moeller; An T Vu; Julio M Duarte-Carvajalino; Christophe Lenglet; Xiaoping Wu; Sebastian Schmitter; Pierre Francois Van de Moortele; John Strupp; Guillermo Sapiro; Federico De Martino; Dingxin Wang; Noam Harel; Michael Garwood; Liyong Chen; David A Feinberg; Stephen M Smith; Karla L Miller; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Saad Jbabdi; Jesper L R Andersson; Timothy E J Behrens; Matthew F Glasser; David C Van Essen; Essa Yacoub
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.