| Literature DB >> 31867339 |
Brenan Durainayagam1,2, Cameron J Mitchell1,3, Amber M Milan1,4, Nina Zeng1, Pankaja Sharma1, Sarah M Mitchell1, Farha Ramzan1, Scott O Knowles4, Anders Sjödin5, Karl-Heinz Wagner6, Nicole C Roy7,8,9, Karl Fraser7,8,9, David Cameron-Smith1,9,10.
Abstract
High protein diets may improve the maintenance of skeletal muscle mass in the elderly, although it remains less clear what broader impact such diets have on whole body metabolic regulation in the elderly. Non-targeted polar metabolomics analysis using HILIC HPLC-MS was used to profile the circulating plasma metabolome of elderly men (n = 31; 74.7 ± 4.0 years) who were randomized to consume for 10 weeks a diet designed to achieve either protein (RDA; 0.8·g-1·kg-1) or that doubled this recommend intake (2RDA; 1.6.g.kg-1). A limited number of plasma metabolites (n = 24) were significantly differentially regulated by the diet. These included markers of protein anabolism, which increased by the 2RDA diet, including; urea, creatine, and glutarylcarnitine. Whilst in response to the RDA diet; glutamine, glutamic acid, and proline were increased, relative to the 2RDA diet (p < 0.05). Metaboanalyst identified six major metabolic pathways to be influenced by the quantity of protein intake, most notably the arginine and proline pathways. Doubling of the recommended protein intake in older males over 10 weeks exerted only a limited impact on circulating metabolites, as determined by LC-MS. This metabolomic response was almost entirely due to increased circulating abundances of metabolites potentially indicative of altered protein anabolism, without evidence of impact on pathways for metabolic health. Trial Registration: This trial was registered on 3rd March 2016 at the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (www.anzctr.org.au) at ACTRN 12616000310460.Entities:
Keywords: dietary protein; nutritional interventions; older adults; pathway mapping; plasma metabolomics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31867339 PMCID: PMC6910071 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Physical characteristics of participants.
| Age (years) | 74.9 ± 1.1 | 73.8 ± 0.9 |
| Height (cm) | 171.8 ± 2.0 | 172.1 ± 1.6 |
| Weight (kg) | 83.9 ± 5.4 | 83.0 ± 2.4 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.2 ± 1.4 | 28.0 ± 0.9 |
Values are means ± standard error of the mean. The RDA is 0.8 g protein·kg.
Figure 1Volcano plot analysis of metabolite changes after 10 weeks dietary intervention. Red dots denote significant (p < 0.05) and fold change (>1.2) features. Blue dots represent significant features (p < 0.05), black dots designate fold change (>1.2), and clear dots represent neither no significance (p > 0.05) or fold change of <1.2.
Figure 2Metabolites which increased in the 2RDA diet. Box and whisker plot showing median, first, and third quartiles, and maximum and minimum values. (A) glutrylcarnitine, (B) trigonelline, (C) TMAO, (D) glycocyamine, (E) creatinine, (F) urea, (G) dihydrothymine, and (H) uridine increased within the 2RDA group. #denotes the significant differences of metabolites between 2RDA and RDA. *Represents the significant differences of metabolites between pre and post intervention within each group.
Figure 3Metabolite responses to 2RDA or RDA after 10 week intervention. Box and whisker plots showing median, first, and third quartiles, and maximum and minimum values. (A) tryptophan, (B) creatine, (C) methylimidazoleacetic acid increased in the 2RDA group. (D) glutamine (E) uric acid, (F) threonine, (G) glutamic acid all increased in the RDA group. (H) 2-aminoadipic acid was higher in the 2RDA group compared to the RDA group. #denotes the significant differences of metabolites between 2RDA and RDA. *Represents the significant differences of metabolites between pre and post intervention within each group.
Figure 4Pre-intervention metabolite differences. Box and whisker plots show median, first, and third quartiles, and maximum and minimum values. There were four metabolites which exhibited pre-intervention differences (A) lenticin, (B) proline, (C) indoleacrylic acid, and (D) arginine. (E) dimethylglycine decreased in both diet groups. #denotes the significant differences of metabolites between 2RDA and RDA. *Represents the significant differences between pre and post-intervention within each group.
Description of the total number of compounds in the pathway.
| Arginine & proline metabolism | 77 | 8 | 2.57E-08 | 2.06E-06 | 0.356 |
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 75 | 6 | 1.03E-05 | 0.00041 | 0.0563 |
| Glycine, serine & threonine metabolism | 48 | 5 | 1.80E-05 | 0.00048 | 0.137 |
| Pyridine metabolism | 60 | 4 | 0.00821 | 0.0164 | 0.0355 |
| Nitrogen metabolism | 39 | 3 | 0.00271 | 0.0372 | 0.000 |
| Glutamine & glutamate metabolism | 11 | 2 | 0.00279 | 0.0372 | 0.139 |
| Alanine, aspartate & glutamate metabolism | 24 | 2 | 0.0132 | 0.151 | 0.384 |
Total compound is the number of compounds involved in the pathway.
Hits is the matched number from the user uploaded data.
The raw p is the original p-value calculated from the enrichment analysis.
Impact value is calculated from pathway topology analysis for comparison among different pathways. It represents the cumulative percentage of importance for the matched metabolite nodes involved in a pathway. The importance of each metabolite node is calculated from centrality measures and represents the percentage with regard to the total pathway importance.
Figure 5Global metabolic network pathways. Nodes correspond to the identified plasma metabolite, and edges indicate a significant correlation between nodes. Red hexagons represent inputted metabolites; pink hexagons represent compounds, blue circles represent genes, green quadrangles represent enzymes, gray quadrangles represent reaction paths.
Topological parameters of key metabolites.
| Glutamic acid | C00025 | 39 | 0.670 | Arginine & proline metabolism, Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, Nitrogen metabolism, Glutamine & glutamate metabolism, Alanine, aspartate & glutamate metabolism |
| Glutamine | C00064 | 19 | 0.645 | Arginine & proline metabolism, Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, Nitrogen metabolism, Glutamine & glutamate metabolism, Alanine, aspartate & glutamate metabolism, Pyrimidine metabolism |
| Arginine | C00062 | 16 | 0.444 | Argine & proline metabolism, Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis |
| Uridine | C00299 | 12 | 1.000 | Pyrimidine metabolism |
The degree of a node is the number of edges associated with it, and the betweenness centrality of a node is the number of shortest communication paths between different pairs of nodes.