Literature DB >> 31867147

A Simple Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe for the Detection of Peroxynitrite.

Luling Wu1, Xue Tian1, Hai-Hao Han2, Jie Wang2, Robin R Groleau1, Paramabhorn Tosuwan3, Boontana Wannalerse3, Adam C Sedgwick4, Steven D Bull1, Xiao-Peng He2, Tony D James1.   

Abstract

Herein, we report the evaluation and synthesis of a reaction based fluorescent probe DCM-Bpin for the detection of Peroxynitrite (ONOO-). DCM-Bpin exhibits selective fluorescence off-on response for ONOO- over other reactive oxygen species, including H2O2. Moreover, DCM-Bpin is biocompatible and has been used to visualize exogenous ONOO- in HeLa cells.
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  boronate; fluorescence; near-infrared; peroxynitrite; probe

Year:  2019        PMID: 31867147      PMCID: PMC6900745          DOI: 10.1002/open.201900301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ChemistryOpen        ISSN: 2191-1363            Impact factor:   2.911


Peroxynitrite (ONOO−) is a key intracellular signaling molecule in both physiological and pathological processes, formed in vivo by the very fast radical coupling reaction between nitric oxide (NO.) and superoxide (O2 .−).1 The high reactivity of ONOO− leads to the reaction with almost all types of biomolecules, such as proteins, lipids and DNA, causing oxidative stress and deleterious effects on cellular function.2, 3 As such, ONOO− has been implicated as a key pathogenic factor for a number of diseases, including inflammatory, ischemia‐reperfusion and neurodegenerative diseases,4, 5 therefore new and effective technologies for ONOO− detection are of prime importance. Of particular interest is the development of novel small molecule fluorescent probes for the detection of such species, as fluorescence probes are often more selective, less invasive and more convenient than many other methods for the detection of biologically relevant analytes in cells.6, 7, 8 Although a wide array of sensors have been developed with absorption and emission peaks in the visible range (400–650 nm), near‐infrared (NIR) fluorescence sensors (emission in 650–900 nm NIR region) are still rare, despite distinct advantages for in vitro and in vivo tracing of molecular processes.9 Not only does NIR fluorescence avoid interference with the auto‐fluorescence of indigenous molecules, near‐infrared light results in less scattering and deeper tissue penetration, limiting the damage to living cells.10, 11 As such, the development of NIR fluorescent sensors is of growing interest to the sensing community.12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Herein we report the evaluation of a D‐π‐A‐based17 fluorescent probe DCMBpin, in which a 2‐(2‐methyl)‐4H‐chromen‐4‐ylidene)malononitrile (DCM) serves as the NIR fluorescence acceptor, and the boronate ester Bpin moiety acts as an ONOO− reporter. The fluorescence of the DCM system is quenched by Bpin, and so its rapid oxidation to the corresponding phenol (donor) by ROS species can be used to trigger a turn‐on response, resulting in a peroxynitrite‐activated “turn‐on” probe (Scheme 1). DCMBpin has previously been reported as part of upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) for the detection of hydrogen peroxide, however, the DCMBpin probe was not evaluated for the detection of ONOO−,18 and given that peroxynitrite reacts with boronates much more rapidly,19 we reasoned this system would be suitable for the detection of peroxynitrite.
Scheme 1

Fluorescence “turn on” mechanism of DCM‐Bpin with the addition of ONOO−.

Fluorescence “turn on” mechanism of DCMBpin with the addition of ONOO−. The synthesis of DCMBpin was successfully achieved in one step by the condensation of 4‐formylphenylboronic acid, pinacol ester and DCM (using the previously described procedure).20 Heating to reflux in ethanol and piperidine for 4.5 hours, followed by filtration and washing with cold ethanol produced DCMBpin as a yellow solid in 62 % yield (Scheme 2).18
Scheme 2

Synthesis of target probe DCM‐Bpin.

Synthesis of target probe DCMBpin. The UV‐Vis (Figure S1) and fluorescence (Figure 1) behavior of DCMBpin was evaluated in pH 7.40 buffer solution (5 % DMSO was required to improve solubility). As shown in Figure S1, the maximum absorption of DCMBpin at 434 nm shifted to 530 nm with the addition of ONOO−. As expected, DCMBpin was initially non‐fluorescent, and upon addition of ONOO− (0‐27 equiv.) a “turn‐on” fluorescence response of up to 50‐fold was observed at 667 nm using an excitation wavelength of 560 nm (Figure 1).
Figure 1

(a) Fluorescence spectra of DCM‐Bpin (10 μM) with addition of ONOO− (from 0 to 27 equiv.) in PBS buffer solution (10 mM, containing 5 % DMSO, pH=7.40). The red line shows the highest intensity after addition of ONOO− (25 equiv.); (b) Fluorescence intensity changes (I/I0) of probe DCM‐Bpin (10 μM) with addition of ONOO− (from 0 to 27 equiv.) in PBS buffer solution (10 mM containing 5 % DMSO, pH=7.40) after 5 min. λex=560 nm/λem=667 nm. Slit widths: ex=10 nm, em=20 nm.

(a) Fluorescence spectra of DCMBpin (10 μM) with addition of ONOO− (from 0 to 27 equiv.) in PBS buffer solution (10 mM, containing 5 % DMSO, pH=7.40). The red line shows the highest intensity after addition of ONOO− (25 equiv.); (b) Fluorescence intensity changes (I/I0) of probe DCMBpin (10 μM) with addition of ONOO− (from 0 to 27 equiv.) in PBS buffer solution (10 mM containing 5 % DMSO, pH=7.40) after 5 min. λex=560 nm/λem=667 nm. Slit widths: ex=10 nm, em=20 nm. Subsequently, we compared the response of DCMBpin to ONOO− over other reactive oxygen species (ROS), including ClO−, •OH, O2 .−, 1O2, ROO•, H2O2 in PBS buffer (10 mM, pH 7.40). As show in Figures 2 and S2, only the addition of ONOO− to the probe lead to any distinct optical spectral changes, with no “turn‐on” response observed for any of the other ROS species. This indicated that DCMBpin has highly selective optical detection for ONOO−.
Figure 2

Selectivity bar chart of probe DCM‐Bpin (10 μM) with addition of various ROS in PBS buffer solution.1. Blank, 2. ONOO− (200 μM), 3. .OH (500 μM), 4. O2 .− (500 μM), 5. 1O2 (500 μM), 6. H2O2 (500 μM), 7. ROO. (500 μM), 8. ClO− (500 μM). ONOO− were measured after 5 min, other ROS were measured after 1 h. Error bar represents s.d. λex=560 nm/λem=667 nm. Slit widths: ex=10 nm, em=20 nm.

Selectivity bar chart of probe DCMBpin (10 μM) with addition of various ROS in PBS buffer solution.1. Blank, 2. ONOO− (200 μM), 3. .OH (500 μM), 4. O2 .− (500 μM), 5. 1O2 (500 μM), 6. H2O2 (500 μM), 7. ROO. (500 μM), 8. ClO− (500 μM). ONOO− were measured after 5 min, other ROS were measured after 1 h. Error bar represents s.d. λex=560 nm/λem=667 nm. Slit widths: ex=10 nm, em=20 nm. Having determined the selectivity of DCMBpin, we evaluated its ability to image exogenous ONOO− at the cellular level using live HeLa cells. As shown in Figure 3, DCMBpin exhibited a good “turn on” response with the addition of peroxynitrite donor SIN‐1.21 No fluorescent response was observed in the presence of up to 25 equivalents of H2O2, confirming the high selectivity of the DCMBpin system to ONOO− over other ROS species. Moreover, MTS cell proliferation assays indicated that DCMBPin was not toxic towards HeLa cells (Figure S5).
Figure 3

Fluorescence imaging of HeLa cells with DCM‐Bpin (20 μM) in the absence or presence of H2O2 or SIN‐1. Excitation channel=560–580 nm, emission channel=650–760 nm. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342.

Fluorescence imaging of HeLa cells with DCMBpin (20 μM) in the absence or presence of H2O2 or SIN‐1. Excitation channel=560–580 nm, emission channel=650–760 nm. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. In conclusion, DCMBpin, a near‐infrared fluorescent probe, was shown to be suitable for the detection of ONOO−. This probe not only exhibits an excellent “turn‐on” response when exposed to peroxynitrite, it also exhibits high selectivity towards ONOO− over other common reactive oxygen species. DCMBpin is biocompatible and displays good sensitivity and selectivity towards ONOO− in HeLa cells.

Experimental Section

General Methods

All starting materials and reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Alfa Aesar, Fluorochem, or Acros Organics, and used as received without any further purification. Unless otherwise stated, all solvents used were reagent grade and were used without distillation. All water was distilled. Thin‐layer chromatography was performed by using commercially available Fluorochem aluminum‐backed plates coated with a layer of silica gel (60 Å) with fluorescent indicator UV254. These plates were visualized by using ultraviolet light with a wavelength of either 254 or 365 nm. Silica gel column chromatography was carried out by using Sigma Aldrich 60 Å silica gel (200–400 mesh). All NMR spectra were obtained using an Agilent ProPulse 500 with all spectra recorded in chloroform‐d. LC−MS analyses were performed using an Agilent QTOF 6545 with Jetstream ESI spray source coupled to an Agilent 1260 Infinity II Quat pump HPLC with 1260 autosampler, column oven compartment and variable wavelength detector (VWD). All pH measurements taken during fluorescence/absorption experiments were recorded on a Hanna Instruments HI 9321 microprocessor pH meter, which was routinely calibrated by using Fisher Chemicals standard buffer solutions (pH 4.0: phthalate; 7.0: phosphate; 10.0: borate). UV‐Vis measurements were performed on an Agilent Cary 60 UV‐Vis Spectrophotometer, utilizing a Hellma silica (quartz) cuvette with a 10 mm path length (provides photometry with two windows). Fluorescence study was performed an Agilent Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer. Full synthetic procedures, characterisation data, and fluorescence analysis protocols can be found in the Supporting Information.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  19 in total

1.  A clearer vision for in vivo imaging.

Authors:  R Weissleder
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Dual excitation ratiometric fluorescent pH sensor for noninvasive bioprocess monitoring: development and application.

Authors:  Haley R Kermis; Yordan Kostov; Peter Harms; Govind Rao
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Far-red to near infrared analyte-responsive fluorescent probes based on organic fluorophore platforms for fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Lin Yuan; Weiying Lin; Kaibo Zheng; Longwei He; Weimin Huang
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  FRET-Based Upconversion Nanoprobe Sensitized by Nd3+ for the Ratiometric Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide in Vivo.

Authors:  Han Wang; Yongkuan Li; Man Yang; Peng Wang; Yueqing Gu
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  A two-photon fluorescent probe with near-infrared emission for hydrogen sulfide imaging in biosystems.

Authors:  Wen Sun; Jiangli Fan; Chong Hu; Jianfang Cao; Hua Zhang; Xiaoqing Xiong; Jingyun Wang; Shuang Cui; Shiguo Sun; Xiaojun Peng
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 6.  Oxygen radicals, nitric oxide, and peroxynitrite: Redox pathways in molecular medicine.

Authors:  Rafael Radi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Targeting Free Radicals in Oxidative Stress-Related Human Diseases.

Authors:  Patrik Poprac; Klaudia Jomova; Miriama Simunkova; Vojtech Kollar; Christopher J Rhodes; Marian Valko
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 8.  Biological Activities of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species: Oxidative Stress versus Signal Transduction.

Authors:  Adelheid Weidinger; Andrey V Kozlov
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2015-04-15

9.  A fast and selective near-infrared fluorescent sensor for multicolor imaging of biological nitroxyl (HNO).

Authors:  Alexandra T Wrobel; Timothy C Johnstone; Alexandria Deliz Liang; Stephen J Lippard; Pablo Rivera-Fuentes
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Reaction-Based Fluorescent Probes for the Detection and Imaging of Reactive Oxygen, Nitrogen, and Sulfur Species.

Authors:  Luling Wu; Adam C Sedgwick; Xiaolong Sun; Steven D Bull; Xiao-Peng He; Tony D James
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 22.384

View more
  3 in total

1.  GNP-CeO2- polyaniline hybrid hydrogel for electrochemical detection of peroxynitrite anion and its integration in a microfluidic platform.

Authors:  Vijayesh Kumar; Ishita Matai; Ankit Kumar; Abhay Sachdev
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  Boronates as hydrogen peroxide-reactive warheads in the design of detection probes, prodrugs, and nanomedicines used in tumors and other diseases.

Authors:  Jyun-Wei Chen; Tzu-Chien Wu; Wun Liang; Jyun-Jia Ciou; Chian-Hui Lai
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 5.671

3.  Dual-Channel Fluorescent Probe for the Simultaneous Monitoring of Peroxynitrite and Adenosine-5'-triphosphate in Cellular Applications.

Authors:  Luling Wu; Jihong Liu; Xue Tian; Robin R Groleau; Beidou Feng; Yonggang Yang; Adam C Sedgwick; Hai-Hao Han; Yang Wang; Han-Min Wang; Fang Huang; Steven D Bull; Hua Zhang; Chusen Huang; Yi Zang; Jia Li; Xiao-Peng He; Ping Li; Bo Tang; Tony D James; Jonathan L Sessler
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 15.419

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.