Luling Wu1, Adam C Sedgwick2, Xiaolong Sun3, Steven D Bull1, Xiao-Peng He4, Tony D James1. 1. Department of Chemistry , University of Bath , Bath BA2 7AY , U.K. 2. University of Texas at Austin , 105 East 24th Street A5300 , Austin , Texas 78712-1224 , United States. 3. Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology , Xi'an Jiaotong University , Xi'an 710049 , China. 4. Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Joint International Research Laboratory of Precision Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Feringa Nobel Prize Scientist Joint Research Center, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering , East China University of Science and Technology , 130 Meilong Road , Shanghai 200237 , China.
Abstract
This Account describes a range of strategies for the development of fluorescent probes for detecting reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), and reactive (redox-active) sulfur species (RSS). Many ROS/RNS have been implicated in pathological processes such as Alzheimer's disease, cancer, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and aging, while many RSS play important roles in maintaining redox homeostasis, serving as antioxidants and acting as free radical scavengers. Fluorescence-based systems have emerged as one of the best ways to monitor the concentrations and locations of these often very short lived species. Because of the high levels of sensitivity and in particular their ability to be used for temporal and spatial sampling for in vivo imaging applications. As a direct result, there has been a huge surge in the development of fluorescent probes for sensitive and selective detection of ROS, RNS, and RSS within cellular environments. However, cellular environments are extremely complex, often with more than one species involved in a given biochemical process. As a result, there has been a rise in the development of dual-responsive fluorescent probes (AND-logic probes) that can monitor the presence of more than one species in a biological environment. Our aim with this Account is to introduce the fluorescent probes that we have developed for in vitro and in vivo measurement of ROS, RNS, and RSS. Fluorescence-based sensing mechanisms used in the construction of the probes include photoinduced electron transfer, intramolecular charge transfer, excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT), and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. In particular, probes for hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorous acid, superoxide, peroxynitrite, glutathione, cysteine, homocysteine, and hydrogen sulfide are discussed. In addition, we describe the development of AND-logic-based systems capable of detecting two species, such as peroxynitrite and glutathione. One of the most interesting advances contained in this Account is our extension of indicator displacement assays (IDAs) to reaction-based indicator displacement assays (RIAs). In an IDA system, an indicator is allowed to bind reversibly to a receptor. Then a competitive analyte is introduced into the system, resulting in displacement of the indicator from the host, which in turn modulates the optical signal. With an RIA-based system, the indicator is cleaved from a preformed receptor-indicator complex rather than being displaced by the analyte. Nevertheless, without a doubt the most significant result contained in this Account is the use of an ESIPT-based probe for the simultaneous sensing of fibrous proteins/peptides AND environmental ROS/RNS.
This Account describes a range of strategies for the development of fluorescent probes for detecting reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), and reactive (redox-active) sulfur species (RSS). Many ROS/RNS have been implicated in pathological processes such as Alzheimer's disease, cancer, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and aging, while many RSS play important roles in maintaining redox homeostasis, serving as antioxidants and acting as free radical scavengers. Fluorescence-based systems have emerged as one of the best ways to monitor the concentrations and locations of these often very short lived species. Because of the high levels of sensitivity and in particular their ability to be used for temporal and spatial sampling for in vivo imaging applications. As a direct result, there has been a huge surge in the development of fluorescent probes for sensitive and selective detection of ROS, RNS, and RSS within cellular environments. However, cellular environments are extremely complex, often with more than one species involved in a given biochemical process. As a result, there has been a rise in the development of dual-responsive fluorescent probes (AND-logic probes) that can monitor the presence of more than one species in a biological environment. Our aim with this Account is to introduce the fluorescent probes that we have developed for in vitro and in vivo measurement of ROS, RNS, and RSS. Fluorescence-based sensing mechanisms used in the construction of the probes include photoinduced electron transfer, intramolecular charge transfer, excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT), and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. In particular, probes for hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorous acid, superoxide, peroxynitrite, glutathione, cysteine, homocysteine, and hydrogen sulfide are discussed. In addition, we describe the development of AND-logic-based systems capable of detecting two species, such as peroxynitrite and glutathione. One of the most interesting advances contained in this Account is our extension of indicator displacement assays (IDAs) to reaction-based indicator displacement assays (RIAs). In an IDA system, an indicator is allowed to bind reversibly to a receptor. Then a competitive analyte is introduced into the system, resulting in displacement of the indicator from the host, which in turn modulates the optical signal. With an RIA-based system, the indicator is cleaved from a preformed receptor-indicator complex rather than being displaced by the analyte. Nevertheless, without a doubt the most significant result contained in this Account is the use of an ESIPT-based probe for the simultaneous sensing of fibrous proteins/peptides AND environmental ROS/RNS.
Reactive
oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS)
are groups of reactive neutral and anionic small molecules that are
produced within many cell types. Common biologically relevant ROS/RNS
include singlet oxygen (1O2) superoxide (O2•–), hydroxyl radical (HO·),
peroxyl radical (ROO·), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hypochlorous acid/hypochlorite (HOCl/ClO–), nitric oxide (NO), nitroxyl (HNO), and peroxynitrite (ONOO–). Although ROS/RNS are involved in many biological
signaling pathways, overproduction of ROS/RNS (oxidative stress) can
result in oxidative damage to a wide range of biomolecules such as
nucleic acids, carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins, which can lead
to loss of molecular and cellular functions. Importantly, excess production
of ROS/RNS has been implicated in pathological processes such as Alzheimer’s
disease (AD), cancer, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and
aging.[1,2]Biological thiols such as glutathione
(GSH) and cysteine (Cys)
play important roles in maintaining redox homeostasis, serving as
antioxidants and acting as free radical scavengers (e.g., GSH acts
a ONOO– scavenger).[3] As
a result, elevated levels of GSH are often produced to protect cells
that are exposed to oxidative stress. Therefore, the susceptibility
of a cell toward ONOO– is largely dependent upon
the concentration of intracellular GSH present. As a consequence,
imbalances in thiol concentration have been implicitly linked to a
number of diseases, such as inflammatory diseases, cancer, and neurodegenerative
disorders.[4,5]The development of fluorescent small-molecule
probes to monitor
the intracellular concentrations of bioanalytes is a powerful tool
to monitor specific cellular processes related to certain diseases.[6−16] Because biological pathways often involve multiple reactive chemical
species, dual-responsive fluorescent probes (AND-logic probes) have
been developed for two different analyte inputs in order to communicate
a detectable signal output.[17−20] At this point we should raise a note of caution:
in the design of fluorescent probes, it is important to consider the
reaction mechanisms involved, products and intermediates formed, and
their cellular distribution and concentration in addition to environmental
factors that may influence the performance and utility of the probes.[21,22]
Fluorescent Probes for ROS/RNS
Fluorescent
Probes for H2O2
Hydrogen peroxide can
diffuse freely across cell
membranes and into and out of cells, where it is known to play critical
roles in several physiological processes, such as apoptosis, cell
proliferation, cell signaling, and differentiation.[23] Therefore, the accumulation of excess H2O2 has also been implicated in numerous pathological conditions,
including aging, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer.[24,25]Background knowledge accumulated from over 26 years of research
on boronic acid-based molecular fluorescent saccharide sensors in
the James group inspired our first fluorescent sensor system for detecting
H2O2. This probe design relies on the increased
Lewis acidity of boronate esters over their corresponding boronic
acids.[26,27]As illustrated in Scheme , the rates of reaction of
boronic acids 1 and 2 with H2O2 in the presence/absence
of d-fructose are opposed. Boronic acid 1 displays
enhanced reactivity toward H2O2 in the presence
of d-fructose. Since the boronate ester formed contains a
more electrophilic boron center, it reacts more rapidly with H2O2, resulting in accelerated oxidative cleavage
to afford the corresponding naphthol. Alternatively, boronic acid 2 displays reduced reactivity toward H2O2 in the presence of d-fructose because it forms a boronate
ester whose reactivity toward H2O2 is reduced
by the presence of a water-inserted N–B bond that reduces the
elecrophilicity of its boron center. The Anslyn group has spent many
years unraveling the nature of solvent-inserted N–B bonds and
has established that they are best represented as species containing
a negatively charged sp3 boron atom (cf. reduced elecrophilicity),
a positively charged tertiary ammonium group, and a hydrogen bond
between the solvent-inserted oxygen and ammonium group (see Scheme b).[28,200] The sensing performance of boronic acid 2 was particularly
interesting since addition of d-fructoseresults in an increase
in the intensity of its fluorescence response in the visible region.
The dual fluorescence response of probe 2 suggests that
using similar systems with more soluble probes may enable mapping
of both intracellular H2O2 AND saccharide concentrations.[29]
Scheme 1
(a) 1 and 1–d-Fructose
Complex for Detecting H2O2; (b) 2 and 2–d-Fructose Complex for Detecting
H2O2
“Turn on” fluorescent sensors are generally more
useful for intracellular sensing applications because “turn
off” fluorescent sensors can be quenched (nonspecifically)
by off-target endogenous species to afford false-positive results.
This led us to start developing sensors based on turn-on intramolecular
charge transfer (ICT) fluorescence systems, which was achieved by
the synthesis of a series of H2O2-responsive
boronate ester-based fluorescence probes (Scheme ). Fluorophores that alter their emission
via changes in ICT usually have an electron donor (D) on one end of
the fluorophore and an electron acceptor (A) on the other end.[30] The probes DSTBPin and MSTBPin exhibited an off–on fluorescence response when exposed to
H2O2, with phenol formation resulting in loss
of an ICT excited state. Conversely, probe CSTBPin exhibited
an on–off reduction in fluorescence when treated with H2O2, caused by the presence of an ICT excited state
in its phenol cleavage product. Interestingly, small reductions in
fluorescence intensity were observed when the long-wavelength probe NDSTBPin was treated with H2O2. This
was attributed to the extended conjugation in that system, which reduced
the ICT effect. These changes in fluorescence output demonstrate the
importance of electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups for
determining the fluorescent output of these types of probes.[31]
Scheme 2
Boronate Probes for Detecting H2O2
The development of
a sensor for a bioanalyte often requires appropriate
selection of both an efficient receptor/reactive group and a matched
chromophore, but this approach often requires long synthetic routes,
and once the chromophore fragment has been prepared, it is not easy
to change its properties. One approach for overcoming the limitations
of this type of receptor-based system is to use the indicator displacement
assay (IDA) approach championed by Anslyn and co-workers.[32] In an IDA system, an indicator is allowed to
bind reversibly to a receptor. Then a competitive analyte is introduced
into the system, resulting in displacement of the indicator from the
host, which in turn modulates the optical signal. We extended the
IDA approach to include reaction-based systems and developed a reaction-based
indicator displacement assay (RIA) suitable for use in detecting H2O2. This system relies on complexation of phenylboronic
acid (PBA) with the indicator Alizarin Red S (ARS) to afford a fluorescent
complex whose aryl unit is oxidatively cleaved upon exposure to H2O2 (turn off) in aqueous media. The reaction of
boronic acidreceptors with ARS was recently investigated by Ishihara,
who reported that all “systems examined are the chelated tetrahedral
anions” over a 5–10 pH range.[33,34] Therefore, Scheme has been updated to reflect the formation of a tetrahedral ARS–PBA
complex as the major species present in solution. These RIA systems
can be used to detect the presence of H2O2 through
monitoring of changes to their colorimetric, fluorometric, and electrochemical
outputs. For example, reaction of the ARS–PBA probe with H2O2resulted in a red-shifted visible color change,
an on–off fluorescence response (due to ARSrelease), and a
turn-on electrochemical signal caused by the formation of phenol.
Our research has shown that this type of RIA system is effective for
monitoring of H2O2 (and H2O2-related species) in environmental and physiological scenarios.[35]
Scheme 3
Mechanism and Fluorescence Spectra of the
ARS–PBA Complex
for Detecting H2O2
Adapted from ref (35). Published by The Royal
Society of Chemistry.
Mechanism and Fluorescence Spectra of the
ARS–PBA Complex
for Detecting H2O2
Adapted from ref (35). Published by The Royal
Society of Chemistry.
Fluorescent
Probes for HOCl/ClO–
The reaction between
chloride anions and H2O2 is catalyzed by myeloperoxidase
(MPO) in leukocytes to generate
HOCl/ClO–, which is deployed for its microbiocidal
properties. Unfortunately, excess production of HOCl/ClO– can also lead to uncontrolled damage to a range of biomolecules,
such as amino acids, proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids.We
recently became interested in exploiting the properties of excited-state
intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) to develop fluorescent sensors.[7,9] Briefly, ESIPT fluorophores normally exist in an enolic (E) form in the ground state, and photoexcitation results
in redistribution of their electronic charge, increasing the acidity
of the hydrogen-bond-donor group and enhancing the basicity of the
hydrogen-bond-acceptor unit. This results in extremely fast enol-to-keto
phototautomerization, with the photoexcited enol form (E*) rapidly converting into the excited keto form (K*),
which displays increased fluorescence. Therefore, we decided to develop
an ESIPT-based fluorescent probe, TCBT-OMe, containing
a HClO/ClO–-responsive dimethylthiocarbamate linker
for HClO/ClO– detection (Scheme ) over biologically relevant concentration
ranges (limit of detection (LOD) = 0.16 nM). Excellent selectivity
was obtained for HClO/ClO– over other ROS/RNS (ONOO–, H2O2, ROO·, ·OH,
O2•–, 1O2, NO) and a range of free amino acids (glycine, asparagine, cysteine,
homocysteine, glutathione, arginine, histidine, serine, glycine, and
threonine), and TCBT-OMe could be used to monitor endogenous
and exogenous HClO/ClO– in HeLa cells.[36]
Scheme 4
ESIPT-Based Probe TCBT-OMe for
Detecting HOCl/ClO–
Morerecently, a series of turn-on benzathiazole probes C1–C7 containing reactive dimethylthiocarbamate
units for the in vivo detection of HClO/ClO– at
biologically relevant concentrations (nanomolar) were developed (Scheme ).[37] These probes displayed a range of blue-to-red “fluorescence
rainbow” emissions, thus facilitating a broad choice of potential
colors for in vivo colorimetric imaging of HClO/ClO–. The fluorescence of probe C7 can target mitochondria
and displays different fluorescence responses to low and high concentrations
of HOCl: an obvious turn-on signal in response to nanomolar concentrations
of HOCl (biologically relevant concentrations, LOD1 = 18
nM) and a subsequent ratiometric response to HOCl at the micromolar
level (high-risk pathogenic concentrations, LOD2 = 0.47
μM)
Scheme 5
ESIPT-Based Probe C7 for Detecting HOCl
Importantly, the ratiometric response of the
fluorescent output
of these sensors provides enhanced reliability compared with simple
fluorescence and avoids any cross-talk caused when several probes
are combined for detection.[38]
Fluorescent Probes for O2•–
Often known as the “‘primary’”
reactive oxygen species, superoxide is responsible for the production
of other ROS/RNS species such as H2O2 and ONOO–. In addition, O2•– is recognized as a potential envoy that regulates the cell-signaling
network.[39] The production of O2•– occurs primarily in mitochondria, caused
by leakage of electrons to O2 from the electron transport
chain, resulting in high reactivity and a short half-life, making
O2•– difficult to detect. However,
because of its high reactivity, it is associated with a range of pathological
conditions such as aging, ischemia–reperfusion injury, and
inflammation.The importance of O2•– in biological systems led us to explore the possibility of developing
an ESIPT-based fluorescent probe for its rapid detection both in vitro
and in vivo. We developed HMBT-LW as a simple ESIPT-based
fluorescent probe that was shown to exhibit good sensitivity and selectivity
for the rapid detection of low concentrations of O2•– (LOD = 7.4 μM) (Scheme ).[40]
Scheme 6
(a) ESIPT-Based
Probe HMBT-LW for Detecting O2•–; (b) Changes in Fluorescence Emission
Intensity of HMBT-LW (5 μM) with Increasing O2•– in Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS)
(10 mM v/v, 1:1 DMSO/PBS, pH 7.4) after 3 min at λex = 310 nm
Adapted with permission from
ref (40). Published
by The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf of the Centre National
de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and the RSC.
(a) ESIPT-Based
Probe HMBT-LW for Detecting O2•–; (b) Changes in Fluorescence Emission
Intensity of HMBT-LW (5 μM) with Increasing O2•– in Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS)
(10 mM v/v, 1:1 DMSO/PBS, pH 7.4) after 3 min at λex = 310 nm
Adapted with permission from
ref (40). Published
by The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf of the Centre National
de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and the RSC.
Fluorescent Probes for ONOO–
Peroxynitrite, a reactive nitrogen species, is produced
via the rapid reaction of O2•– with NO and is known for its destructive properties in cellular
systems, where it readily causes irreversible damage to lipids, proteins,
and DNA. As a result, uncontrolled generation of ONOO– has been implicated as a key pathogenic factor in numerous diseases,
including ischemia–reperfusion injury, neurodegenerative diseases,
inflammation, and cancer. Consequently, the development of a fluorescent
probe for the selective cellular detection of ONOO– in the presence of other ROS/RNS may potentially facilitate advances
in diagnostics resulting in improved treatments for numerous medical
conditions.Expanding on our original approach previously described
in Scheme , we employed
a similar approach for the intracellular detection of ONOO– using boronic acid[41,42] as a sensing motif in the presence
of monosaccharides (e.g., d-fructose). Once again, the presence
of ONOO– results in oxidative cleavage of the boronic
ester fragment of the probe 3–d-fructose
complex, which triggers a significant on–off fluorescence response
(Scheme ). The probe 3–d-fructose complex demonstrated excellent
selectivity over most other ROS and RNS (H2O2, NO2–, NO3–, ROO·, O2•–, HO·,
and NO), enabling it to be used to successfully visualize exogenous
(HeLa) and endogenous (RAW 264.7) ONOO– in living
cells, thus providing the opportunity to investigate diseases such
as inflammation that are known to generate increased levels of ONOO–.[43]
Scheme 7
Probe 3 for Detecting ONOO– in the
Presence of d-Fructose
ARIA probe containing a boronic acid (NBA) as the receptor and
ARS as the reporter fluorophore was also developed for the fluorescent
detection of ONOO–(Scheme ).[44] The parent
ARS–NBA system displayed a negligible response toward H2O2 and other ROS/RNS as a result of protection
of the boron center by the N–B solvent–insertion interaction.[28] However, a significant UV–vis absorption
and fluorescence response was observed in the presence of morereactive
ONOO–, illustrating that an RIA system could be
developed and employed for the in vitro and in vivo sensing of ROS
and RNS.[44]
Scheme 8
ARS–NBA Complex
for Detecting ONOO–
Our initial sensors were designed to incorporate a N–B solvent-insertion
interaction to reduce the reactivity of the boronic acid unit in order
to enable selectivity for morereactive ONOO– over
less nucleophilic ROS. However, during our investigations we discovered
that the reactivity of ONOO– compared with other
ROS (i.e., H2O2) was sufficiently greater that
this additional protection element was not necessary. Therefore, while
the N–B solvent insertion does enhance the selectivity of the
probes for ONOO– over other ROS, we have found that
simple boronate estersreact significantly faster with low concentrations
of ONOO– to make this additional protecting group
strategy unnecessary. Therefore, we set out to develop an ESIPT-based
fluorescent sensor for detecting ONOO– where rapid
ONOO–-facilitated oxidation of a boronate ester
“protecting” unit of probe 4 is used to
trigger the ESIPT turn-on process (Figure ). Oxidative cleavage of the boronate ester
fragment of probe 4 results in an increase in fluorescence,
allowing this probe to be used for the visualization of ONOO– in the RAW 264.7 and HeLa cell lines.[45] Morerecently, we developed ABAH-LW as an ESIPT ratiometric
boronate-based probe that was used for the successful visualization
of ONOO– in the endoplasmic reticulum of HeLa cells
(Scheme ).[46]
Figure 1
Probe 4 for detecting ONOO–.
Scheme 9
(a) Probe ABAH-LW for
Detecting ONOO–; (b) Changes in Fluorescence Emission
of ABAH-LW (3
μM) with Increasing Addition of ONOO– in PBS
(pH 8.2, Containing 8% DMSO, 1 mM CTAB) after 1 min at λex = 370 nm
Adapted with permission from
ref (46). Copyright
2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Probe 4 for detecting ONOO–.
(a) Probe ABAH-LW for
Detecting ONOO–; (b) Changes in Fluorescence Emission
of ABAH-LW (3
μM) with Increasing Addition of ONOO– in PBS
(pH 8.2, Containing 8% DMSO, 1 mM CTAB) after 1 min at λex = 370 nm
Adapted with permission from
ref (46). Copyright
2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.An important
feature of turn-on fluorescent sensors used for detection
of bioanalytes in cellular systems is the excitation and emission
wavelengths of the fluorescence process. In particular, long-wavelength
systems in the near-infrared (NIR) region are desirable because they
have lower background fluorescence and enable the use of low-energy
light sources that result in less tissue damage during imaging. In
addition, long-wavelength fluorophores also allow for deeper penetration
and visualization of cellular masses and tissues, making them more
suitable for whole-animal imaging experiments. Because of these factors,
we developed two long-wavelength boronate fluorescent probes, TCFB1 and TCFB2, for detecting ONOO– in cellular systems (Figure ). TCFB1 was shown to have a low sensitivity
toward ONOO– and exhibited poor solubility in aqueous
solution, but TCFB2 could be used to monitor exogenous
and endogenous ONOO–, producing a significant fluorescence
turn-on response to ONOO– in numerous cell lines
(Hep-G2, RAW 264.7, HeLa, and A459).[47]
Figure 2
TCFB1 and TCFB2 for detecting ONOO–.
TCFB1 and TCFB2 for detecting ONOO–.The Chang group developed PR1, a seminal long-wavelength
probe for detecting H2O2 (Scheme ).[48] We recently improved the synthesis of PR1 and demonstrated
that it can be used as a sensitive and selective sensor for ONOO– as well as H2O2. As part of
our research, we carried out detailed investigations of the ability
of PR1 to visualize pathways responsible for the generation
of ONOO–, with fluorescence imaging demonstrating
the cellular location of PR1 in polarized J774.2 macrophages.[49]
Scheme 10
PR1 for Detecting ONOO–
Fluorescent
Probes for NO/HNO
Nitric
oxide is a signaling molecule produced from l-arginine by
a family of nitric oxide synthases (NOSs). Many physiological processes
are mediated by NO, including neurotransmission, immune regulation,
smooth muscle relaxation, and blood pressureregulation, and uncontrolled
production of NO can lead to nitrosative stress with the formation
of ONOO–.The one-electron reduction of NO
produces nitroxyl radical (HNO), which has a unique chemical and biological
profile compared with NO. Since it is a small neutral molecule (pKa ≈ 11.4), it can freely cross cell membranes
and can be involved in redox reactions with a range of biological
oxidants and reductants. Since HNO has been shown to have some beneficial
physiological properties, it is considered to be a possible pharmacological
agent in applications to increase cardiac output, afford protective
effects against myocardial ischemia injury, and act as an anticancer
agent.Consequently, we designed a selective and sensitive fluorescent
probe with a turn-on fluorescence response for NO and HNO under physiological
conditions (Scheme ). The fluorescence response of this water-soluble complex 1–copper(II) is caused by NO+-mediated nitration
of its amino group, which stops photoinduced electron transfer (PeT)[30] through release of copper(I) from the receptor.
This biocompatible probe could be used for imaging of exogenous and
endogenous NO and HNO in live cells (HeLa and RAW 264.7, respectively).[50]
Scheme 11
1–copper(II) Complex
for Detecting NO and HNO
Fluorescent Probes for Reactive (Redox-Active)
Sulfur Species
Fluorescent Probes for
Biological Thiols (GSH,
Cys, and HCys)
Glutathione is a natural tripeptide (γ-l-glutamyl-l-cysteinylglycine) that is present as an
antioxidant in cells at millimolar concentrations; it exists mainly
as the reduced form (GSH) rather than the oxidized disulfide form
(GSSG). However, under conditions of oxidative stress, elevated levels
of GSH are often seen, and the susceptibility of cells toward damage
from ROS/RNS species is strongly correlated to the intracellular GSH
level. In this respect, dysregulation of GSH homeostasis has been
identified as an indicator of numerous diseases, including the onset
of AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and liver damage.Cysteine is a biological-thiol-containing α-amino acid that
plays an important part in several biological processes, including
cellular detoxification, protein synthesis, and metabolism. Nevertheless,
atypical levels of Cys are also linked with several disease states,
including neurological disorders, motor neuron diseases, and cancer.The naturally occurring aminothiol homocysteine (HCys) is biosynthesized
through demethylation of the proteinogenic α-amino acid methionine
(Met). The structural similarity of HCys to Met means that it can
potentially be accepted as a substrate by methionyl t-RNA synthetase
(MetRS) for protein synthesis. However, the error-editing capacity
of MetRS prevents unwanted incorporation of HCys into proteins through
a cleavage pathway that results in the formation of HCysthiolactone
(HTL). However, HTL can then undergo an irreversible nonenzymatic
reaction with the lysineresidues of proteins via a process known
as protein N-homocysteinylation that results in structural modifications,
protein aggregation, and loss of enzymatic function. Hyperhomocysteinemia
(i.e., raised levels of HCys) has been linked with numerous diseases,
including neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases and pregnancy
disorders.Given the biological importance of these thiols,
we were interested
in developing suitable fluorescent probes for their measurement and
localization in cellular systems. Consequently, we developed an NIR
and colorimetric molecular probe based on a dicyanomethylene-4H-pyran (DCM) chromophore that facilitates the selective
detection of GSH in living cells (HeLa) (Scheme ). The fluorescence turn-on response of
this probe is generated from its reaction with GSH, which results
in cleavage of its 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonyl (DNBS) unit and release
of a fluorescent chromophore.[51]
Scheme 12
Probe 5 for Detecting GSH
Two other tricyanofuran (TCF)-based turn-on fluorescence probes, TCF-GSH and TCFCl-GSH, that rely on cleavage
of a DNBS unit were prepared as sensors for biological thiols (Figure ). While TCF-GSH was sensitive toward the presence of GSH (LOD = 0.28 μM),
this probe proved to be toxic to live cells, and its fluorescence
intensity decreased at higher concentrations of GSH (>50 μM).
To overcome this problem, TCFCl-GSH was developed, which
was shown to detect GSH at biologically relevant concentrations (LOD
= 0.45 μM). TCFCl-GSH proved to be nontoxic and
produced a clear turn-on response with good photostability when exogenous
GSH was added to HeLa cells. TCFCl-GSH could be used
to evaluate changing levels of GSH in live cells. For example, the
addition of H2O2 or cisplatin, which are known
to deplete endogenous GSH, reduced the fluorescence intensity, whereas
addition of N-acetylcysteine, a known GSH-generating
drug, restored the biological thiol levels and fluorescence intensity.[52]
Figure 3
TCF-GSH and TCFCl-GSH for detecting
GSH.
TCF-GSH and TCFCl-GSH for detecting
GSH.Expanding the use of the DCM chromophore,
the potential of using
a novel NIR theranostic prodrug, DCM-S-CPT, for cancer
chemotherapy in living animals was explored (Figure ). Connection of the DCM fragment
to the camptothecin (CPT) drug fragment through a covalent disulfide
linker turns off the fluorescence and cytotoxicity of DCM-S-CPT. However, the presence of excess GSH in cancer cells can result
in selective cleavage of the disulfide bond of the linker of DCM-S-CPT, which releases the cytotoxic drug cargo and
the fluorophore from PEG–PLA-loaded nanoparticles. This tumor-cell-specific
release mechanism enabled NIR fluorescent monitoring to be used to
track the ability of this DCM-S-CP prodrug system to
deliver its cytotoxic payload to tumor-bearing nude mice in vivo.
PEG–PLA nanoparticles loaded with DCM-S-CPT were
found to exhibit enhanced antitumor activity and greater plasma half-life
in mice than CPT alone.[53]
Figure 4
Theranostic prodrug DCM-S-CPT.
Theranostic prodrug DCM-S-CPT.The excellent photophysical
properties of boron–dipyrromethene
(BODIPY)[54] were exploited to develop molecular
probe 6 as a red-emitting fluorescence resonance energy
transfer (FRET) sensor for the selective detection of Cys and HCys
(Figure ). The BODIPY
unit of probe 6 (shown in blue) acts as a FRET donor,
while its O-protected 4-hydroxyphenyl-BODIPY fragment (shown in green)
acts as a FRET acceptor to modulate its fluorescence response. Treatment
of 6 with an exogenous thiolresults in cleavage of the
DNBS unit from the fluorophore fragment, which then affords a turn-on
fluorescence response. Addition of Cys (or HCys) turns on red emission
at 590 nm upon excitation at 505 nm, thus producing a pseudo-Stokes
shift of 77 nm that is significantly greater than the small Stokes
shift (ca. 10 nm) normally observed for such BODIPY-based FRET systems.[55]
Figure 5
(a) Probe 6 for detecting thiols. (b) Fluorescence
emission spectra of probe 6 (10 μM) before and
after addition of l-cysteine (300 μM) in 4:1 v/v MeOH/H2O at λex = 505 nm at 37 °C. Adapted
with permission from ref (55). Copyright 2012 Royal Society of Chemistry.
(a) Probe 6 for detecting thiols. (b) Fluorescence
emission spectra of probe 6 (10 μM) before and
after addition of l-cysteine (300 μM) in 4:1 v/v MeOH/H2O at λex = 505 nm at 37 °C. Adapted
with permission from ref (55). Copyright 2012 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fluorescent Probes for H2S/Na2S
Hydrogen sulfide has been reported as an endogenous
gaseous transmitter that regulates several physiological and pathological
processes, including neurotransmission, vasodilation, inflammation,
atherosclerosis, oxidative stress, and inhibition of insulin signaling.The biological importance of H2S prompted us to develop
the galactosyl(azido)naphthalimide-based fluorogenic probe DT-Gal, in which the galactosyl unit is used as a targeting group for liver
cells and the azido unit acts as a functional group for selective
reaction with H2S (Scheme ). The potential of DT-Gal to act as a
target-specific probe for imaging of H2S in HepG2 liver
cancer cells has been demonstrated,[56] as
abnormal H2S levels are known to be important in the pathogenesis
of a number of liver diseases.
Scheme 13
DT-Gal for Detecting
H2S
1-Oxo-1H-phenalene-2,3-dicarbonitrile (OPD) was
also developed as a selective and sensitive fluorescent probe for
detection of aqueous Na2S over other thiols and inorganic
sulfur compounds (Scheme ). The fluorescence increased with the sulfide concentration
from 1.0 to 30 μM with an LOD of 52 nM.[57]
Scheme 14
OPD for Detecting Na2S
AND-Logic-Based Fluorescent Probes for Detecting
ROS/RNS, RSS, and Other Species
Standard fluorescent probes
require a single analyte to produce
a fluorescence response. However, biological pathways are complex
and dependent on the presence/action of multiple reactive chemical
species. As a result, a number of fluorescent probes for dual or multianalyte
detection have been developed that can be used as molecular logic
gates for medical diagnostic applications. Consequently, we are interested
in the development of AND-logic-based fluorescent probes that require
the simultaneous or sequential action of two or more bioanalytes to
produce a fluorescence response. Importantly, dual-analyte probes
have the advantage that they are capable of simultaneously detecting
short-lived species that may be produced only transiently in a cell,
which is often not possible if two different sensing probes are employed
for the independent sensing of each analyte. In addition, we believe
that these dual-probe systems are particularly interesting since they
provide an unequivocal method to monitor bimolecular events that may
be responsible for progression of a specific disease.[58]Our initial aim was to develop an AND-logic-based
fluorescent probe
for the simultaneous detection of ONOO– and GSH
that would allow monitoring of intracellular GSH levels in cells under
oxidative stress. The probe GSH-PF3 containing a cleavable
DNBS linker, which was prepared from commercially available fluorescein
in three steps, produced a minimal fluorescence response when GSH
and ONOO– wereadded independently. However, when
both analytes were present simultaneously, GSH-PF3 produced
a significant fluorescence enhancement (40-fold) (Scheme ). GSH-PF3 exhibited
exceptional selectivity for detection of GSH AND ONOO– analytes in cellular systems, producing a strong fluorescence response
only when both GSH AND ONOO– are present.[59]
Scheme 15
(a) GSH-PF3 for Detecting
ONOO– AND
GSH; (b, c) Fluorescence Spectra of GSH-PF3 (0.5 μM)
upon Addition of (a) ONOO– (10 μM) Followed
by GSH (0–80 μM) with a 5 min Wait between Additions
and (c) GSH (200 μM) Followed by Addition of ONOO– (0–10 μM) with a 10 min Wait between Additions (52
wt % Methanol, pH 8.21, λex = 488 nm, 25 °C)
Adapted with permission from
ref (59). Copyright
2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.
(a) GSH-PF3 for Detecting
ONOO– AND
GSH; (b, c) Fluorescence Spectra of GSH-PF3 (0.5 μM)
upon Addition of (a) ONOO– (10 μM) Followed
by GSH (0–80 μM) with a 5 min Wait between Additions
and (c) GSH (200 μM) Followed by Addition of ONOO– (0–10 μM) with a 10 min Wait between Additions (52
wt % Methanol, pH 8.21, λex = 488 nm, 25 °C)
Adapted with permission from
ref (59). Copyright
2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.The ESIPT-based
AND-logic fluorescent probe GSH-ABAH with good cellular
permeability was next prepared for the simultaneous
detection of ONOO– AND biological thiols (Scheme ). A fluorescence
response was not observed when either SIN-1 (ONOO– donor) or GSH was added to RAW264.7 cells, but simultaneous addition
of both analytes resulted in a strong fluorescence response.[60]
Scheme 16
(a) GSH-ABAH for Detecting
ONOO– AND
GSH; (b, c) Fluorescence Spectra of GSH-ABAH (2 μM)
upon Addition of (a) ONOO– (4 μM) Followed
by GSH (0–2 μM) after a 1 min Wait and (c) GSH (5 μM)
Followed by ONOO– (0–14 μM) after a
1 min Wait (8% DMSO, 1 mM CTAB, pH 8.20, λex = 390
nm, 25 °C)
Adapted with permission from
ref (60). Copyright
2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.
(a) GSH-ABAH for Detecting
ONOO– AND
GSH; (b, c) Fluorescence Spectra of GSH-ABAH (2 μM)
upon Addition of (a) ONOO– (4 μM) Followed
by GSH (0–2 μM) after a 1 min Wait and (c) GSH (5 μM)
Followed by ONOO– (0–14 μM) after a
1 min Wait (8% DMSO, 1 mM CTAB, pH 8.20, λex = 390
nm, 25 °C)
Adapted with permission from
ref (60). Copyright
2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.Since Chang’s PR1 sensor was a good system
for ONOO–, we decided to add additional cleavable
linkers to that probe to develop a new series of AND probes for ONOO– and other selected bioanalytes. Accordingly, a new
fluorescent resorufin-based “pinkment” probe[61] was used as an easily functionalizable scaffold
to produce a range of AND-based fluorescent probes for detecting ONOO– and a second analyte (Scheme ). A pinkment-OH core unit
was used to prepare pinkment-OTBS and pinkment-OAc as proof-of-concept systems that were shown to function as dual
probes for detecting ONOO– AND F– or H2O2 AND esterase activity, respectively.[62]
Scheme 17
Pinkment-OH for Detecting
ONOO–, Pinkment-OTBS for Detecting
ONOO– AND Fluoride,
and Pinkment-OAc for Detecting ONOO– AND Esterase Activity
Morerecently, an enzyme-mediated fluorescein-based dual-analyte
probe, PF3-Glc, consisting of β-glucosidase (β-glc)
and H2O2 trigger units was developed as part
of an AND-based system. β-glc catalyzes hydrolysis of the glycosidic
bond of PF3-Glc to afford monoboronate fluorescein PF3 (nonfluorescent) and glucose, which is oxidized by glucose
oxidase (GOx) to afford d-glucono-δ-lactone with the
concomitant generation of H2O2. The H2O2 that is produced then facilitates oxidative cleavage
of the boronic ester fragment of PF3 to afford fluorescein,
whose formation results in an 80-fold increase in the fluorescence
intensity of the system (Scheme ).[63]
Scheme 18
Dual-Enzyme-Activated PF3-Glc
A series of environmentally
sensitive 3-hydroxyflavone (3-HF) ESIPT
boronate-based fluorescent probes were developed that exhibit a ratiometric
response toward ONOO– in a micellar environment
(Figure a). Environmental
sensitivity of a fluorescence probe is often considered to be an unwelcome
property for sensing applications, but we have used the sensitivity
of 3-HF toward hydrophobic environments to differentiate between micellar
and aqueous environments. In addition the progression of AD is
known to be associated with the formation of insoluble amyloid-β
(Aβ) plaques, so we have used our ESIPT-based 3-HF probes to
image different aggregation states of Aβ in the presence of
ONOO–. For example, the probe 3-HF-OMe was found to produce a ratiometric fluorescence response when bound
to Aβ aggregates in the presence of ONOO–,
thus affording a novel protein-based host–guest system. Fluorescence
imaging studies of 3-HF-OMe revealed high N-state fluorescence
in mice brain sections (Figure b, blue channel) that were shown to contain Aβ aggregates
through correlation studies with anti-Aβ42 antibodies (Figure b, red channel).
Subsequent treatment of these brain sections with ONOO– generated the T* state of 3-HF-OMe (Figure c, green channel) with regions
of fluorescence once again correlated with anti-Aβ antibody
fluorescence studies (Figure c, red channel). These highly promising biomacromolecular
imaging results demonstrate how other ESIPT-based probes might potentially
be used for simultaneous sensing of fibrous proteins/peptides AND
environmental ROS/RNS. This system can be considered as a “reactive
species” AND “environment” based fluorescent
probe.[64]
Figure 6
(a) ESIPT probes 3-HF-X (X
= OMe, Me, H) for detecting
ONOO–. The normal (N) and phototautomeric
(T*) forms are shown. (b, c) Fluorescence imaging of
a brain section of a transgenic mouse treated with 3-HF-OMe (20 μM) (b) without and (c) with ONOO– (30
μM). The excitation/emission wavelengths for the blue (N-state), green (T*-state), and red (anti-Aβ
antibody) channels are 404/425–475, 404/500–550, and
561/640–730 nm, respectively. The white arrows indicate stained
Aβ aggregates. Reprinted from ref (64). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
(a) ESIPT probes 3-HF-X (X
= OMe, Me, H) for detecting
ONOO–. The normal (N) and phototautomeric
(T*) forms are shown. (b, c) Fluorescence imaging of
a brain section of a transgenic mouse treated with 3-HF-OMe (20 μM) (b) without and (c) with ONOO– (30
μM). The excitation/emission wavelengths for the blue (N-state), green (T*-state), and red (anti-Aβ
antibody) channels are 404/425–475, 404/500–550, and
561/640–730 nm, respectively. The white arrows indicate stained
Aβ aggregates. Reprinted from ref (64). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Conclusions
This Account has described
research carried out in our research
groups over the past six years toward the development of fluorescent
sensors to probe redox biology and provide a better understanding
of the various disease states that generate excess ROS. In section we have described
the development of dual-activated sensors, which we believe will prove
instrumental in providing an understanding of the complex role that
different ROS species play in the complex pathways that underpin disease-specific
redox processes.We anticipate that the use of dual-activated
probes to evaluate
cellular changes associated with many different disease states will
become increasingly important, with probes that areresponsive to
different environmental conditions present in cells becoming more
prevalent. We hope that this Account of the research carried out in
our groups has demonstrated that responsive fluorescent probes can
serve as effective tools to investigate dynamic redox chemistry in
living systems and will provide inspiration to develop fluorescent
tools that will facilitate improved disease diagnostics and therapies
for the treatment of diseases.
Authors: A. Prasanna de Silva; H. Q. Nimal Gunaratne; Thorfinnur Gunnlaugsson; Allen J. M. Huxley; Colin P. McCoy; Jude T. Rademacher; Terence E. Rice Journal: Chem Rev Date: 1997-08-05 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Paul G Winyard; Brent Ryan; Paul Eggleton; Ahuva Nissim; Emma Taylor; Maria Letizia Lo Faro; Torsten Burkholz; Katalin E Szabó-Taylor; Bridget Fox; Nick Viner; Richard C Haigh; Nigel Benjamin; Andrew M Jones; Matthew Whiteman Journal: Biochem Soc Trans Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 5.407
Authors: Cai-Xia Yin; Kang-Ming Xiong; Fang-Jun Huo; James C Salamanca; Robert M Strongin Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Steven D Bull; Matthew G Davidson; Jean M H van den Elsen; John S Fossey; A Toby A Jenkins; Yun-Bao Jiang; Yuji Kubo; Frank Marken; Kazuo Sakurai; Jianzhang Zhao; Tony D James Journal: Acc Chem Res Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 22.384
Authors: Balaraman Kalyanaraman; Victor Darley-Usmar; Kelvin J A Davies; Phyllis A Dennery; Henry Jay Forman; Matthew B Grisham; Giovanni E Mann; Kevin Moore; L Jackson Roberts; Harry Ischiropoulos Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2011-10-02 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Adam C Sedgwick; Xiaolong Sun; Gyoungmi Kim; Juyoung Yoon; Steven D Bull; Tony D James Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Adam C Sedgwick; Jordan E Gardiner; Gyoungmi Kim; Maksims Yevglevskis; Matthew D Lloyd; A Toby A Jenkins; Steven D Bull; Juyoung Yoon; Tony D James Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Hidefumi Iwashita; Erika Castillo; Marco S Messina; Raymond A Swanson; Christopher J Chang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Maria Weber; Namiko Yamada; Xue Tian; Steven D Bull; Masafumi Minoshima; Kazuya Kikuchi; Amanda B Mackenzie; Tony D James Journal: Front Chem Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 5.221
Authors: Luling Wu; Chusen Huang; Ben P Emery; Adam C Sedgwick; Steven D Bull; Xiao-Peng He; He Tian; Juyoung Yoon; Jonathan L Sessler; Tony D James Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 54.564