Luling Wu1,2,3, Jihong Liu1, Xue Tian3, Robin R Groleau3, Beidou Feng4, Yonggang Yang4, Adam C Sedgwick5, Hai-Hao Han6, Yang Wang2, Han-Min Wang7, Fang Huang1, Steven D Bull3, Hua Zhang4, Chusen Huang2, Yi Zang7, Jia Li7, Xiao-Peng He6, Ping Li1, Bo Tang1, Tony D James1,3,4, Jonathan L Sessler5. 1. College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Key Laboratory of Molecular and Nano Probes, Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Functionalized Probes for Chemical Imaging in Universities of Shandong, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, People's Republic of China. 2. The Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Resource Chemistry, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Functional Materials, and Shanghai Municipal Education Committee Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging Probes and Sensors, Department of Chemistry, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Shanghai 200234, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, U.K. 4. School of Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, People's Republic of China. 5. Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, 105 E 24th Street A5300, Austin, Texas 78712-1224, United States. 6. Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Joint International Research Laboratory of Precision Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Feringa Nobel Prize Scientist Joint Research Center, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai 200237, People's Republic of China. 7. National Center for Drug Screening, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 189 Guo Shoujing Road, Shanghai 201203, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
Changes in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and peroxynitrite (ONOO-) concentrations have been correlated in a number of diseases including ischemia-reperfusion injury and drug-induced liver injury. Herein, we report the development of a fluorescent probe ATP-LW, which enables the simultaneous detection of ONOO- and ATP. ONOO- selectively oxidizes the boronate pinacol ester of ATP-LW to afford the fluorescent 4-hydroxy-1,8-naphthalimide product NA-OH (λex = 450 nm, λem = 562 nm or λex = 488 nm, λem = 568 nm). In contrast, the binding of ATP to ATP-LW induces the spirolactam ring opening of rhodamine to afford a highly emissive product (λex = 520 nm, λem = 587 nm). Due to the differences in emission between the ONOO- and ATP products, ATP-LW allows ONOO- levels to be monitored in the green channel (λex = 488 nm, λem = 500-575 nm) and ATP concentrations in the red channel (λex = 514 nm, λem = 575-650 nm). The use of ATP-LW as a combined ONOO- and ATP probe was demonstrated using hepatocytes (HL-7702 cells) in cellular imaging experiments. Treatment of HL-7702 cells with oligomycin A (an inhibitor of ATP synthase) resulted in a reduction of signal intensity in the red channel and an increase in that of the green channel as expected for a reduction in ATP concentrations. Similar fluorescence changes were seen in the presence of SIN-1 (an exogenous ONOO- donor).
Changes in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and peroxynitrite (ONOO-) concentrations have been correlated in a number of diseases including ischemia-reperfusion injury and drug-induced liver injury. Herein, we report the development of a fluorescent probe ATP-LW, which enables the simultaneous detection of ONOO- and ATP. ONOO- selectively oxidizes the boronate pinacol ester of ATP-LW to afford the fluorescent 4-hydroxy-1,8-naphthalimide product NA-OH (λex = 450 nm, λem = 562 nm or λex = 488 nm, λem = 568 nm). In contrast, the binding of ATP to ATP-LW induces the spirolactam ring opening of rhodamine to afford a highly emissive product (λex = 520 nm, λem = 587 nm). Due to the differences in emission between the ONOO- and ATP products, ATP-LW allows ONOO- levels to be monitored in the green channel (λex = 488 nm, λem = 500-575 nm) and ATP concentrations in the red channel (λex = 514 nm, λem = 575-650 nm). The use of ATP-LW as a combined ONOO- and ATP probe was demonstrated using hepatocytes (HL-7702 cells) in cellular imaging experiments. Treatment of HL-7702 cells with oligomycin A (an inhibitor of ATP synthase) resulted in a reduction of signal intensity in the red channel and an increase in that of the green channel as expected for a reduction in ATP concentrations. Similar fluorescence changes were seen in the presence of SIN-1 (an exogenous ONOO- donor).
Adenosine-5′-triphosphate
(ATP) has been referred to as
the “molecular currency”.[1,2] ATP concentrations
range between 1 and 10 mM, with a 1000:1 ratio between ATP and adenosine
diphosphate (ADP) typically prevailing.[3] ATP aids the regulation of important cellular functions, including
cellular movement,[4] neurotransmission,[5] and ion channel function.[6] Disruption to ATP homeostasis is linked to a number of diseases,
including ischemia, Parkinson’s disease, and hypoglycemia.[7] The cause of this disruption is often ascribed
to oxidative stress, which involves the production of highly reactive
oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS).[8,9] In particular, peroxynitrite (ONOO–)[10] is an RNS that is known to inhibit ATP production
by oxidatively deactivating mitochondrial ATP synthase.[11] Correlations between ATP and ONOO– concentrations have been observed in a number of pathological events.[12−14] Therefore, the development of a chemical tool that allows the real-time
monitoring of these species simultaneously in vitro and in vivo would be highly desirable.Fluorescence
imaging has emerged as an attractive technology for
the real-time and noninvasive detection of biomarkers in cellular
and animal-based applications. Previously, several single-analyte
fluorescent probes have been reported for the selective imaging of
ONOO–.[15−17] Moreover, fluorescent probes
for the selective detection and visualization of ATP have been developed.[18] However, to our knowledge no fluorescent probes
capable of the simultaneous and independent imaging of ONOO– and ATP have been reported. If available, such systems would allow
the presumed close relationship between these two critical species
to be monitored in real time. Herein, we report the construction of
ATP-LW, a single fluorescent probe that enables the simultaneous detection
of ONOO– and ATP. Initial solution data established
excellent water solubility, sensitivity, and high selectivity for
ONOO– and ATP using their respective detection emission
profiles. As a preliminary proof-of-concept study for cellular applications,
changes in ATP and ONOO– associated with acetaminophen
(APAP) were evaluated. This model was chosen due to the importance
of preclinical tools for drug development in the screening of drug-induced
liver injury (DILI) associated with drugs like APAP.[19−21] Furthermore, this model was selected because APAP can result in
a depletion of ATP and an increase in the levels of ONOO– (Scheme S1).[22,23] We believe ATP-LW could prove popular as a fluorescent tool in fundamental
and clinical research. For example, the Sessler group has been developing
type-II immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducers, where the ICD agent
results in ROS-mediated ER stress and subsequent ATP release. We anticipate
that ATP-LW will facilitate the rapid identification of type-II ICD
inducers.[24] It is important to note that
we first disclosed our probe ATP-LW as a ChemRxiv preprint;[25] however, we felt that the associated journal
contribution (i.e., this article) would be substantially improved
with the addition of biological experiments. Unfortunately, the Covid-19
pandemic severely hindered our research progress, and in the time
between the ChemRxiv preprint and the present submission, the group
of Tian et al. reported a somewhat similar structure for the simultaneous
detection of ATP and H2O2.[26] Pointedly, Merck recognized the potential of ATP-LW and
has made it commercially available.[27] However,
details regarding the scope, utility, and even mode of use have yet
to appear in a peer-reviewed forum. This report is designed to address
this deficiency and to highlight the utility of what is now a commercially
available fluorescent ONOO– and ATP probe, ATP-LW.At this point it is worth discussing the selectivity of boronate
ester-based probes toward ONOO– and H2O2. Since the seminal report by Sikora et al., numerous
research groups, including our own, have determined that boronate
ester-based fluorescent probes have a preferential reactivity toward
ONOO–.[28−30] As such, it is now universally
accepted that ONOO– reacts several orders of magnitude
faster than hydrogen peroxide (microseconds vs hours).[31] In addition an observed lack of response toward
ONOO– may indicate degradation of the fluorescent
reporter by the highly reactive ONOO–.[20]In recent years, multianalyte fluorescent
probes have garnered
attention owing to their enhanced precision for the study in question.[32,33] These systems overcome the problems of using several independent
fluorescent probes when seeking to understand the relationship between
more than one biological species.[31] Efforts
from our group and others have led to the development of multianalyte
fluorescent probes.[31] For example, we reported
AND-logic gate-like dual-analyte fluorescence scaffolds that permit
the detection of ONOO– and a second analyte.[34−38] However, we believe that systems able to detect more than one analyte
independently using different emission channels will prove particularly
advantageous;[20] this is because, in principle,
dual-channel emission should enable the concurrent evaluation of each
individual species, whereas AND-logic systems only provide information
on the synergy of the two species.In this work, we have used
a rhodamine lactam/1,8-naphthalimide
hybrid structure as a scaffold to create the dual-analyte fluorescent
probe ATP-LW (Scheme ).[39] ATP-LW was synthesized over three
steps (Scheme S2). The first step of the
synthesis involves a Miyaura borylation reaction, which forms intermediate
NA-Bpin. Diethylenetriamine was then added to a solution of rhodamine
B in methanol. This reaction afforded intermediate Rh-AM as a light
orange solid. Condensation between NA-Bpin and Rh-AM in ethanol then
afforded ATP-LW. The chemical structure of ATP-LW was fully characterized
using 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy, as well
as high-resolution mass spectrometry.
Scheme 1
Chemical Structure
of ATP-LW and Its Fluorescence “Turn On”
Mechanism in the Presence of ONOO–, ATP, and ONOO–/ATP)
The addition of ONOO– leads to formation of compound NA-OH, with a maximum emission at
562 nm when excited at 450 nm and a maximum at 568 nm when excited
at 488 nm in PBS buffer solution (10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O
= 1/99, pH = 7.40). The presence of ATP affords the product Rh-Bpin,
with a maximum emission at 587 nm when excited at 520 nm in PBS buffer
solution (10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O = 1/99, pH = 7.40).
Chemical Structure
of ATP-LW and Its Fluorescence “Turn On”
Mechanism in the Presence of ONOO–, ATP, and ONOO–/ATP)
The addition of ONOO– leads to formation of compound NA-OH, with a maximum emission at
562 nm when excited at 450 nm and a maximum at 568 nm when excited
at 488 nm in PBS buffer solution (10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O
= 1/99, pH = 7.40). The presence of ATP affords the product Rh-Bpin,
with a maximum emission at 587 nm when excited at 520 nm in PBS buffer
solution (10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O = 1/99, pH = 7.40).
Results and Discussion
In initial studies, the changes
in the UV–vis absorption
spectral features of ATP-LW in the presence of ONOO– and ATP were investigated in aqueous media (PBS buffer, 10 mM, v/v,
EtOH/H2O = 1/99, pH = 7.40). The addition of ONOO– produced a new absorption peak at 445 nm, which is consistent with
the known intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) process seen in 4-hydroxy-1,8-naphthalimide
products (Figure S1).[40] Similarly, the addition of ATP to ATP-LW resulted in an
increase in the absorption intensity at 553 nm. This was taken as
evidence for the ATP-induced opening of the spirolactam ring on the
rhodamine fluorophore (Figure S2).[18] ATP-LW was initially nonfluorescent, presumably
as the result of quenching by the boronic ester on the 1,8-naphthalimide
unit, and the ring-closed form of rhodamine being inherently nonfluorescent.
Upon the addition of ONOO– (0–16 μM),
an increase in the fluorescence intensity at 562 nm/568 nm was observed
upon excitation at 450/488 nm (Figure a, Figures S7–S10). A minimal fluorescence increase was observed for light excitation
at 520 nm upon the addition of ONOO– (0–16
μM) (Figure b). The formation of a 4-hydroxy-1,8-naphthalimide product upon treatment
of ATP-LW with ONOO– was confirmed by LC-MS analysis
(Scheme S3, Figures S24 and S25). A 488 nm excitation wavelength was used for the
measurements in aqueous solution since it was the excitation wavelength
for cellular imaging experiments (green channel, λem = 500–575 nm, λex = 488 nm).
Figure 1
Changes in the fluorescence
emission intensity of ATP-LW (15 μM)
seen upon the addition of ONOO– (from 0 to 16 μM)
in modified PBS buffer (10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O = 1/99, pH
= 7.40) after 1 min. (a) Sample excited at 450 (bandwidth 8) nm; (b)
sample excited at 520 (bandwidth 8) nm. Inset: Enlarged views of the
spectra in (b). Changes in the fluorescence emission intensity of
ATP-LW (15 μM) seen upon the addition of ATP (from 0 to 15 mM)
in modified PBS buffer solution (10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O =
1/99, pH = 7.40) after 100 min. (c) Sample excited at 520 (bandwidth
8) nm; (d) sample excited at 450 (bandwidth 8) nm. Inset: Enlarged
views of the spectra in (d).
Changes in the fluorescence
emission intensity of ATP-LW (15 μM)
seen upon the addition of ONOO– (from 0 to 16 μM)
in modified PBS buffer (10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O = 1/99, pH
= 7.40) after 1 min. (a) Sample excited at 450 (bandwidth 8) nm; (b)
sample excited at 520 (bandwidth 8) nm. Inset: Enlarged views of the
spectra in (b). Changes in the fluorescence emission intensity of
ATP-LW (15 μM) seen upon the addition of ATP (from 0 to 15 mM)
in modified PBS buffer solution (10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O =
1/99, pH = 7.40) after 100 min. (c) Sample excited at 520 (bandwidth
8) nm; (d) sample excited at 450 (bandwidth 8) nm. Inset: Enlarged
views of the spectra in (d).Subsequently we evaluated the ability of ATP-LW to detect ATP.
A large increase in fluorescence intensity at 587 nm (>80-fold,
see Figure c and Figure S4) was observed following the addition
of ATP (0–15 mM) to an aqueous solution of ATP-LW when the
samples were excited at 520 nm. However, the addition of ATP (0–15
mM) to ATP-LW resulted in only a small increase in the fluorescence
intensity upon excitation at either 450 (Figure d) or 488 nm (Figure S6). The disparity in emission and excitation profiles seen
for ATP and ONOO– provides support for the notion
that ATP-LW may be used to detect separately, albeit contemporaneously,
these two important analytes.We then explored the fluorescence
response of ATP-LW in the presence
of both ONOO– and ATP. It was found that the peak
at 589 nm for ATP-LW retained sensitivity to changes in the ATP concentration
even after the addition of ONOO– (16 μM) when
excitation was effected at 520 nm (Figure S13). Conversely, the emission peaks at 562 nm (Figure S14) or 569 nm (Figure S15) were seen to change as a function of the ONOO– concentration, but were only slightly influenced by the presence
or absence of ATP (15 mM). These results were taken as a further indication
that ATP-LW may be used to detect ONOO– and ATP
independently, on the condition that two different excitation wavelengths
are used (Scheme ).
We appreciate that the two emission peaks for ATP-LW are not well
separated. As such, it is difficult to ascertain whether Förster
resonance energy transfer (FRET) is occurring between the naphthalimide
and rhodamine that make up ATP-LW.[39] However,
on the basis of density functional theoretical analysis we believe
that FRET does not occur to a significant extent between the two fluorophores
present in ATP-LW (Figure S22).We
then evaluated the selectivity of the probe ATP-LW toward a
variety of potential biologically relevant interferents (Figures and 3). Other ROS, such as H2O2 and HOCl,
led to no change in the fluorescence intensity of ATP-LW under conditions
identical to those used to study ONOO– and ATP (Figure ). However, exposure
of ATP-LW to ADP (10 mM) led to an enhancement in the fluorescence
intensity (Figure ). Since the concentration of ATP is around 1000-fold higher than
ADP in cells,[3] as noted above, it seems
highly unlikely that this cross reactivity will preclude the use of
ATP-LW for the effective detection of ATP in cells.
Figure 2
Selectivity bar chart
for probe ATP-LW (15 μM) in PBS buffer
solution (10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O = 1/99, pH = 7.40) with
ONOO– (16 μM) or other ROS. (1) ONOO–; (2) H2O2 (100 μM); (3) probe ATP-LW
alone; (4) HOCl (100 μM); (5) ROO• (200 μM);
(6) •OH (100 μM); (7) O2•– (100 μM); (8) 1O2 (100 μM); (9)
APAP (20 mM); λex/em= 450 (bandwidth 8) nm/562 nm.
Time points were taken at 1 min (black bars), 10 min (red bars), and
30 min (blue bars).
Figure 3
Selectivity bar chart
of ATP-LW (15 μM) in PBS buffer solution
(10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O = 1/99, pH = 7.40) upon treatment
with ATP (15 mM) or other potential interferents. (1) Probe ATP-LW
alone; (2) ATP (15 mM); (3) adenosine diphosphate (ADP, 10 mM); (4)
uridine 5′-triphosphate, trisodium salt (UTP trisodium salt
10 mM); (5) guanosine 5′-triphosphate, disodium salt (GTP disodium
salt, 10 mM); (6) cytidine 5′-triphosphate disodium salt (CTP
disodium salt, 10 mM); (7) cysteine (1 mM); (8) glutathione (1 mM);
(9) homocysteine (1 mM); (10) KCl (6 mM); (11) CaCl2 (2
mM); (12) MgCl2 (1 mM); (13) CuCl2 (100 μM);
(14) ZnCl2 (100 μM); (15) NaCl (100 mM); (16) APAP
(20 mM); λex/em = 520 (bandwidth 8) nm/587 nm. Time
points were taken at 30 min (black bars), 60 min (red bars), and 100
min (blue bars).
Selectivity bar chart
for probe ATP-LW (15 μM) in PBS buffer
solution (10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O = 1/99, pH = 7.40) with
ONOO– (16 μM) or other ROS. (1) ONOO–; (2) H2O2 (100 μM); (3) probe ATP-LW
alone; (4) HOCl (100 μM); (5) ROO• (200 μM);
(6) •OH (100 μM); (7) O2•– (100 μM); (8) 1O2 (100 μM); (9)
APAP (20 mM); λex/em= 450 (bandwidth 8) nm/562 nm.
Time points were taken at 1 min (black bars), 10 min (red bars), and
30 min (blue bars).Selectivity bar chart
of ATP-LW (15 μM) in PBS buffer solution
(10 mM, v/v, EtOH/H2O = 1/99, pH = 7.40) upon treatment
with ATP (15 mM) or other potential interferents. (1) Probe ATP-LW
alone; (2) ATP (15 mM); (3) adenosine diphosphate (ADP, 10 mM); (4)
uridine 5′-triphosphate, trisodium salt (UTP trisodium salt
10 mM); (5) guanosine 5′-triphosphate, disodium salt (GTP disodium
salt, 10 mM); (6) cytidine 5′-triphosphate disodium salt (CTP
disodium salt, 10 mM); (7) cysteine (1 mM); (8) glutathione (1 mM);
(9) homocysteine (1 mM); (10) KCl (6 mM); (11) CaCl2 (2
mM); (12) MgCl2 (1 mM); (13) CuCl2 (100 μM);
(14) ZnCl2 (100 μM); (15) NaCl (100 mM); (16) APAP
(20 mM); λex/em = 520 (bandwidth 8) nm/587 nm. Time
points were taken at 30 min (black bars), 60 min (red bars), and 100
min (blue bars).Exposure to ONOO– resulted in a statistically
significant fluorescence increase that was instantaneous on the laboratory
time scale (Figure S16), while the reaction
of ATP-LW and ATP required approximately 100 min to reach saturation
(Figure S17). We next confirmed that ATP-LW
exhibits good stability over a pH range from 3 to 11 (Figures S11 and S12). The fluorescence emission
of a test solution formed by treating ATP-LW with ONOO– was found to decrease at lower pH, a finding that could reflect
the known decomposition of ONOO– in acidic media
(Figure S11).[41] The fluorescence intensity at 587 nm was also found to decrease
at higher pH (pH > 8), a result ascribed to the hydrolysis of ATP
under basic conditions (Figure S12).[42]The above results prompted us to explore
the use of ATP-LW for
imaging live cells. First, we confirmed using an MTT assay that ATP-LW
was non-toxic to HL-7702 cells over concentrations ranging from 0
to 1 mM with an incubation time of 24 h (Figure S27). The ability of ATP-LW to image ONOO– and ATP in living cells was then evaluated using excitation wavelengths
of 488 and 514 nm, respectively. ATP-LW demonstrated a clear “turn
on” response upon the addition of 3-morpholinosydnonimine hydrochloride
(SIN-1, a donor of ONOO–)[43] when monitored using the green channel (Figure a and b). Meanwhile, a 0.61-fold decrease
in the red channel was observed as compared to the control group (Figure c). We then evaluated
crosstalk between the two channels, and as expected, no appreciable
fluorescence was observed in either channel 3 (λex = 488 nm, λem = 575–650 nm) or channel 4 (λex = 514 nm,
λem = 520–575 nm) when HL-7702 cells were
treated with ATP-LW and simultaneously exposed to ATP and SIN-1 (Figure S28). Having confirmed the absence of
crosstalk, fluorescence changes using the ONOO– scavenger
uric acid were evaluated.[44] The addition
of uric acid (500 μM) and SIN-1 (1.0 mM) led to a 0.32-fold
decrease in the average green fluorescence intensity and 1.60-fold
enhancement in the average red fluorescence intensity, when compared
with the corresponding SIN-1 group (as determined by monitoring the
green and red channels, respectively, Figure ). These results are consistent with suggestions
in the literature that an increase in the ONOO– concentration
can result in depletion of ATP.[22]
Figure 4
One-photon
confocal imaging of ONOO– and ATP
levels in hepatocytes treated with SIN-1 or SIN-1/uric acid. (a) One-photon
fluorescence images of HL-7702 cells recorded after the addition of
SIN-1 (1 mM, 1 h) and uric acid (500 μM, 1 h) with monitoring
over the green (ONOO–) and red (ATP) channels. Control
group: Cells were stained with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min.
SIN-1 group: Cells were incubated with SIN-1 (1 mM) for 1 h, then
stained with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. UA + SIN-1 group:
Cells were pretreated with uric acid (500 μM) for 1 h and followed
by adding SIN-1 (1 mM) for 1 h and then stained with probe ATP-LW
(20 μM) for 20 min. Green fluorescence channel for ONOO–: λex = 488 nm, λem = 500–575 nm. Red fluorescence channel for ATP: λex = 514 nm, λem = 575–650 nm. (b)
Green relative fluorescence intensity output of three groups. (c)
Red relative fluorescence intensity output of three groups. Note:
The green fluorescence intensity of the control group is defined as
1.0. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Concordant results
were obtained from five independent experiments.
One-photon
confocal imaging of ONOO– and ATP
levels in hepatocytes treated with SIN-1 or SIN-1/uric acid. (a) One-photon
fluorescence images of HL-7702 cells recorded after the addition of
SIN-1 (1 mM, 1 h) and uric acid (500 μM, 1 h) with monitoring
over the green (ONOO–) and red (ATP) channels. Control
group: Cells were stained with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min.
SIN-1 group: Cells were incubated with SIN-1 (1 mM) for 1 h, then
stained with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. UA + SIN-1 group:
Cells were pretreated with uric acid (500 μM) for 1 h and followed
by adding SIN-1 (1 mM) for 1 h and then stained with probe ATP-LW
(20 μM) for 20 min. Green fluorescence channel for ONOO–: λex = 488 nm, λem = 500–575 nm. Red fluorescence channel for ATP: λex = 514 nm, λem = 575–650 nm. (b)
Green relative fluorescence intensity output of three groups. (c)
Red relative fluorescence intensity output of three groups. Note:
The green fluorescence intensity of the control group is defined as
1.0. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Concordant results
were obtained from five independent experiments.We then set out to evaluate how imbalances in the energy metabolism
instigated by obstructing ATP production can influence production
of ONOO–. Oligomycin A (omy A) inhibits ATP synthase
by blocking its FO unit.[45] As
shown in Figure ,
after hepatocytes were incubated with omy A (25 μM) for 1 h,
a 38% decrease in the red channel signal relative to the initial level
was seen (Figure c).
Concurrently, a 1.64-fold increase in the green channel intensity
was seen, as expected for an increase in the ONOO– levels as compared to healthy hepatocytes (Figure b). The addition of exogenous ATP (10 mM)
yielded a green channel intensity that was 95% of the control group
(Figure b), while
the intensity of the red channel increased to almost the same level
as the control group (Figure c). While not a proof, these findings support the conclusion
that the addition of exogenous ATP induces recovery[26] and that ROS/RNS production is affected by mitochondrial
damage to ATP synthesis, leading to an increase of ONOO–. These results are not surprising since it is known that omy A induces
cellular apoptosis via ATP inhibition;[46,47] moreover,
oxidative stress (i.e., ONOO–) is an associated
factor in apoptosis-related cell death.[48] As such, our results support the conclusion that omy A induces the
production of ONOO– in a cellular environment via
ATP inhibition.
Figure 5
One-photon confocal imaging of ONOO– and ATP
levels in hepatocytes treated with omy A or omy A/ATP. (a) One-photon
fluorescence images of HL-7702 cells with the addition of omy A (25
μM, 1 h) and ATP (10 mM, 1 h) for green (ONOO–) and red (ATP) channels. Control group: Cells were stained with
probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. Omy A group: Cells were incubated
with omy A (25 μM) for 1 h, then stained with probe ATP-LW (20
μM) for 20 min. Omy A + ATP group: Cells were pretreated with
omy A (25 μM) for 1 h followed by adding ATP (10 mM) for 1 h
and then stained with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. Green
fluorescence channel for ONOO–: λex = 488 nm, λem = 500–575 nm. Red fluorescence
channel for ATP: λex = 514 nm, λem = 575–650 nm. (b) Green relative fluorescence intensity output
of three groups. (c) Red relative fluorescence intensity output of
three groups. Note: The green fluorescence intensity of the control
group is defined as 1.0. The data are expressed as the mean ±
SD. Concordant results were obtained from five independent experiments.
One-photon confocal imaging of ONOO– and ATP
levels in hepatocytes treated with omy A or omy A/ATP. (a) One-photon
fluorescence images of HL-7702 cells with the addition of omy A (25
μM, 1 h) and ATP (10 mM, 1 h) for green (ONOO–) and red (ATP) channels. Control group: Cells were stained with
probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. Omy A group: Cells were incubated
with omy A (25 μM) for 1 h, then stained with probe ATP-LW (20
μM) for 20 min. Omy A + ATP group: Cells were pretreated with
omy A (25 μM) for 1 h followed by adding ATP (10 mM) for 1 h
and then stained with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. Green
fluorescence channel for ONOO–: λex = 488 nm, λem = 500–575 nm. Red fluorescence
channel for ATP: λex = 514 nm, λem = 575–650 nm. (b) Green relative fluorescence intensity output
of three groups. (c) Red relative fluorescence intensity output of
three groups. Note: The green fluorescence intensity of the control
group is defined as 1.0. The data are expressed as the mean ±
SD. Concordant results were obtained from five independent experiments.ROS and RNS are regarded as biomarkers in DILI
and are thus analytes
that have been frequently targeted using fluorescent probes.[19,21] Previous studies confirm that ATP production is decreased by exposure
to APAP.[22,49,50] APAP-induced
hepatoxicity was thus chosen as the model to investigate whether ATP-LW
could detect ONOO– and ATP, since these two species
could serve as early diagnostic biomarkers. Treatment of HL-7702 cells
with APAP produced a marked increase in the fluorescence of the green
channel and a significant decrease in the fluorescence in the red
channel (Figure ).
This finding underscores how upregulation of intracellular ONOO– and depletion of ATP occur after administration of
APAP while serving to illustrate the ability of our probe to detect
concentration changes of these two biomarkers via one-photon confocal
imaging in a DILI cellular model. This was further confirmed using N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC), which is a precursor
for the substrate (l-cysteine) in the synthesis of reduced
glutathione (GSH) and commonly used for the treatment of APAP overdose.[51,52] GSH is capable of eliminating ONOO–, and as such
has been used to help treat APAP overdoses.[53,54] Upon addition of NAC, the fluorescence intensity in the green channel
decreased and that of the red channel increased (Figure ). This finding is thus consistent
with the reduction of ONOO– and an increase in the
ATP concentration under these conditions.
Figure 6
One-photon confocal images
of APAP-induced injury and its remediation
by NAC in HL-7702 cells. (a) One-photon fluorescence images of HL-7702
cells with the addition of APAP (15 mM, 2 h) and NAC (2 mM, 2 h) for
green (ONOO–) and red (ATP) channels. Control group:
Cells were stained with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. APAP
group: Cells were incubated with APAP (15 mM) for 2 h and then stained
with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. APAP + NAC group: Cells
were pretreated with NAC (2 mM) for 2 h and then incubated with APAP
(15 mM) for 2 h, followed by staining with probe ATP-LW (20 μM)
for another 20 min. Green fluorescence channel for ONOO–: λex = 488 nm, λem = 500–575
nm. Red fluorescence channel for ATP: λex = 514 nm,
λem = 575–650 nm. (b) Green relative fluorescence
intensity output of three groups. (c) Red relative fluorescence intensity
output of three groups. Note: The green fluorescence intensity of
the control group is defined as 1.0. The data are expressed as the
mean ± SD. Concordant results were obtained from five independent
experiments.
One-photon confocal images
of APAP-induced injury and its remediation
by NAC in HL-7702 cells. (a) One-photon fluorescence images of HL-7702
cells with the addition of APAP (15 mM, 2 h) and NAC (2 mM, 2 h) for
green (ONOO–) and red (ATP) channels. Control group:
Cells were stained with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. APAP
group: Cells were incubated with APAP (15 mM) for 2 h and then stained
with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. APAP + NAC group: Cells
were pretreated with NAC (2 mM) for 2 h and then incubated with APAP
(15 mM) for 2 h, followed by staining with probe ATP-LW (20 μM)
for another 20 min. Green fluorescence channel for ONOO–: λex = 488 nm, λem = 500–575
nm. Red fluorescence channel for ATP: λex = 514 nm,
λem = 575–650 nm. (b) Green relative fluorescence
intensity output of three groups. (c) Red relative fluorescence intensity
output of three groups. Note: The green fluorescence intensity of
the control group is defined as 1.0. The data are expressed as the
mean ± SD. Concordant results were obtained from five independent
experiments.Our attention then turned to two-photon
imaging[55] of ONOO– and
ATP using ATP-LW, with the
same cell models used above. The results (Figure ) served to confirm the ability of ATP-LW
to image both ONOO– and ATP, using an excitation
of 976 nm for the former and 1028 nm for the latter, and we extended
the emission range for the red channel (i.e., 575–680 nm).
Figure 7
Two-photon
fluorescence images of APAP-induced injury with HL-7702
cells. (a) Two-photon fluorescence images of HL-7702 cells with the
addition of APAP (20 mM, 2 h) and NAC (2 mM, 2 h) for green (ONOO–) and red (ATP) channels. Control group: Cells were
stained with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. APAP group: Cells
were incubated with APAP (20 mM) for 2 h and then stained with probe
ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. APAP + NAC group: Cells were pretreated
with NAC (2 mM) for 2 h and then incubated with APAP (20 mM) for 2
h, followed by staining with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for another
20 min. Two-photon green fluorescence channel for ONOO–: λex = 976 nm, λem = 500–575
nm. Two-photon red fluorescence channel for ATP: λex = 1028 nm, λem = 575–680 nm. (b) Green relative
fluorescence intensity output of three groups. (c) Red relative fluorescence
intensity output of three groups. Note: The green fluorescence intensity
of the control group is defined as 1.0. The data are expressed as
the mean ± SD. Concordant results were obtained from five independent
experiments.
Two-photon
fluorescence images of APAP-induced injury with HL-7702
cells. (a) Two-photon fluorescence images of HL-7702 cells with the
addition of APAP (20 mM, 2 h) and NAC (2 mM, 2 h) for green (ONOO–) and red (ATP) channels. Control group: Cells were
stained with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. APAP group: Cells
were incubated with APAP (20 mM) for 2 h and then stained with probe
ATP-LW (20 μM) for 20 min. APAP + NAC group: Cells were pretreated
with NAC (2 mM) for 2 h and then incubated with APAP (20 mM) for 2
h, followed by staining with probe ATP-LW (20 μM) for another
20 min. Two-photon green fluorescence channel for ONOO–: λex = 976 nm, λem = 500–575
nm. Two-photon red fluorescence channel for ATP: λex = 1028 nm, λem = 575–680 nm. (b) Green relative
fluorescence intensity output of three groups. (c) Red relative fluorescence
intensity output of three groups. Note: The green fluorescence intensity
of the control group is defined as 1.0. The data are expressed as
the mean ± SD. Concordant results were obtained from five independent
experiments.
Conclusion
In summary, we have developed
a novel dual-analyte fluorescent
probe (ATP-LW), which provides a fluorescence response toward ONOO– and ATP simultaneously by means of different excitation
wavelengths. Probe ATP-LW comprises two responsive units that are
expected to react independently with ONOO– and ATP,
respectively.[31] Upon the addition of ONOO– alone, the 4-hydroxy-1,8-naphthalimide subunit luminesces
(λex = 450 nm, λem = 562 nm or λex = 488 nm, λem = 568 nm); conversely, when
ATP alone is present, the rhodamine ring opens and luminesces (λex = 520 nm, λem = 587 nm). In order to detect
ONOO– and ATP in cellular milieus with minimal crosstalk,
we choose to monitor the emission over the green channel (λex = 488 nm, λem = 500–575 nm) and
red channel (λex = 514 nm, λem =
575–650 nm). It was found that by using ATP-LW and two different
channels it is possible to monitor concurrently the enhancement of
ONOO– and depletion of ATP during APAP-induced hepatotoxicity.
This monitoring provides support for the proposed signaling pathways
for APAP-induced toxicity wherein ONOO– increases
and ATP depletion are thought to be responsible for hepatic necrosis.[56] We anticipate that ATP-LW can be extended to
image fluctuations of these two biomarkers in other diseases, such
as ischemia-reperfusion injury.[14]
Authors: Michael Kirsch; Hans Gert Korth; Angela Wensing; Reiner Sustmann; Herbert de Groot Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Adam C Sedgwick; Hai-Hao Han; Jordan E Gardiner; Steven D Bull; Xiao-Peng He; Tony D James Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Luling Wu; Jihong Liu; Xue Tian; Robin R Groleau; Steven D Bull; Ping Li; Bo Tang; Tony D James Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 9.825