Literature DB >> 31866695

ESTIMATING DIFFEOMORPHIC MAPPINGS BETWEEN TEMPLATES AND NOISY DATA: VARIANCE BOUNDS ON THE ESTIMATED CANONICAL VOLUME FORM.

Daniel J Tward1, Partha P Mitra2, Michael I Miller3.   

Abstract

Anatomy is undergoing a renaissance driven by the availability of large digital data sets generated by light microscopy. A central computational task is to map individual data volumes to standardized templates. This is accomplished by regularized estimation of a diffeomorphic transformation between the coordinate systems of the individual data and the template, building the transformation incrementally by integrating a smooth flow field. The canonical volume form of this transformation is used to quantify local growth, atrophy, or cell density. While multiple implementations exist for this estimation, less attention has been paid to the variance of the estimated diffeomorphism for noisy data. Notably, there is an infinite dimensional unobservable space defined by those diffeomorphisms which leave the template invariant. These form the stabilizer subgroup of the diffeomorphic group acting on the template. The corresponding flat directions in the energy landscape are expected to lead to increased estimation variance. Here we show that a least-action principle used to generate geodesics in the space of diffeomor-phisms connecting the subject brain to the template removes the stabilizer. This provides reduced-variance estimates of the volume form. Using simulations we demonstrate that the asymmetric large deformation diffeomorphic mapping methods (LDDMM), which explicitly incorporate the asymmetry between idealized template images and noisy empirical images, provide lower variance estimators than their symmetrized counterparts (cf. ANTs). We derive Cramer-Rao bounds for the variances in the limit of small deformations. Analytical results are shown for the Jacobian in terms of perturbations of the vector fields and divergence of the vector field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational anatomy; Hamiltonian dynamics; cell density; morphometry

Year:  2018        PMID: 31866695      PMCID: PMC6924927          DOI: 10.1090/qam/1527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Appl Math        ISSN: 0033-569X            Impact factor:   0.815


  51 in total

1.  Geodesic Shooting for Computational Anatomy.

Authors:  Michael I Miller; Alain Trouvé; Laurent Younes
Journal:  J Math Imaging Vis       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 1.627

2.  Image-based estimation of ventricular fiber orientations for personalized modeling of cardiac electrophysiology.

Authors:  Fijoy Vadakkumpadan; Hermenegild Arevalo; Can Ceritoglu; Michael Miller; Natalia Trayanova
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Using registration uncertainty visualization in a user study of a simple surgical task.

Authors:  Amber L Simpson; Burton Ma; Elvis C S Chen; Randy E Ellis; A James Stewart
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2006

4.  Whole brain diffeomorphic metric mapping via integration of sulcal and gyral curves, cortical surfaces, and images.

Authors:  Jia Du; Laurent Younes; Anqi Qiu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template.

Authors:  Susumu Mori; Kenichi Oishi; Hangyi Jiang; Li Jiang; Xin Li; Kazi Akhter; Kegang Hua; Andreia V Faria; Asif Mahmood; Roger Woods; Arthur W Toga; G Bruce Pike; Pedro Rosa Neto; Alan Evans; Jiangyang Zhang; Hao Huang; Michael I Miller; Peter van Zijl; John Mazziotta
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  The Allen Brain Atlas: 5 years and beyond.

Authors:  Allan R Jones; Caroline C Overly; Susan M Sunkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  A multi-scale kernel bundle for LDDMM: towards sparse deformation description across space and scales.

Authors:  Stefan Sommer; Mads Nielsen; François Lauze; Xavier Pennec
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2011

8.  Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy.

Authors:  S Joshi; Brad Davis; Matthieu Jomier; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping Registration of Reconstructed 3D Histological Section Images and in vivo MR Images.

Authors:  Can Ceritoglu; Lei Wang; Lynn D Selemon; John G Csernansky; Michael I Miller; J Tilak Ratnanather
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Robust Diffeomorphic Mapping via Geodesically Controlled Active Shapes.

Authors:  Daniel J Tward; Jun Ma; Michael I Miller; Laurent Younes
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-04-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Multimodal cross-registration and quantification of metric distortions in marmoset whole brain histology using diffeomorphic mappings.

Authors:  Brian C Lee; Meng K Lin; Yan Fu; Junichi Hata; Michael I Miller; Partha P Mitra
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Longitudinal atrophy in early Braak regions in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Long Xie; Laura E M Wisse; Sandhitsu R Das; Nicolas Vergnet; Mengjin Dong; Ranjit Ittyerah; Robin de Flores; Paul A Yushkevich; David A Wolk
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.