Literature DB >> 31865544

Cost Analysis of a Randomized Trial of Getting to Outcomes Implementation Support of CHOICE in Boys and Girls Clubs in Southern California.

Patricia M Herman1, Matthew Chinman2, Jill Cannon3, Patricia Ebener3, Patrick S Malone4, Joie Acosta5, Elizabeth J D'Amico3.   

Abstract

Costs of supporting prevention program implementation are not well known. This study estimates the societal costs of implementing CHOICE, a voluntary after-school alcohol and other drug prevention program for adolescents, in Boys and Girls Clubs (BGCs) across Southern California with and without an implementation support system called Getting To Outcomes© (GTO). This article uses micro-costing methods to estimate the cost of the CHOICE program and GTO support. Labor and expense data were obtained from logs kept by the BGC staff and by the GTO technical assistance (TA) staff, and staff time was valued based on Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates. From the societal perspective, the cost of implementing CHOICE at BGCs over the 2-year study period was $27 per attendee when CHOICE was offered by itself (all costs incurred by the BGCs) and $177 per attendee when CHOICE was offered with GTO implementation support ($67 cost to the BGCs; $110 to the entity funding GTO). These results were most sensitive to assumptions as to the number of times CHOICE was offered per year. Adding GTO implementation support to CHOICE increased the cost per attendee by approximately $150. For this additional cost, there was evidence that the CHOICE program was offered with more fidelity and offered more often after the 2-year intervention ended. If the long-term benefits of this better and continued implementation are found to exceed these additional costs, GTO could be an attractive structure to support evidence-based substance misuse prevention programs. Trial Registration. This project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02135991 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02135991). The trial was registered May 12, 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent prevention programs; Cost analysis; Evidence-based programs; Implementation support; Substance use prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31865544      PMCID: PMC6993980          DOI: 10.1007/s11121-019-01082-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of current practice in school-based substance use prevention programs with meta-analysis findings.

Authors:  Susan T Ennett; Christopher L Ringwalt; Judy Thorne; Louise Ann Rohrbach; Amy Vincus; Ashley Simons-Rudolph; Shelton Jones
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2003-03

2.  Will the 'principles of effectiveness' improve prevention practice? Early findings from a diffusion study.

Authors:  D Hallfors; D Godette
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2002-08

3.  Psychometric properties and U.S. National norms of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS).

Authors:  Gregory A Aarons; Charles Glisson; Kimberly Hoagwood; Kelly Kelleher; John Landsverk; Guy Cafri
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2010-06

Review 4.  Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.

Authors:  Joseph A Durlak; Emily P DuPre
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2008-06

Review 5.  Preventive interventions addressing underage drinking: state of the evidence and steps toward public health impact.

Authors:  Richard Spoth; Mark Greenberg; Robert Turrisi
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Multisite cost analysis of a school-based voluntary alcohol and drug prevention program.

Authors:  Beau Kilmer; James R Burgdorf; Elizabeth J D'Amico; Jeremy Miles; Joan Tucker
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.582

7.  A 26-year follow-up study of heavy drinking trajectories from adolescence to mid-adulthood and adult disadvantage.

Authors:  Noora Berg; Olli Kiviruusu; Sakari Karvonen; Laura Kestilä; Tomi Lintonen; Ossi Rahkonen; Taina Huurre
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.826

8.  Alcohol and marijuana use trajectories in a diverse longitudinal sample of adolescents: examining use patterns from age 11 to 17 years.

Authors:  Elizabeth J D'Amico; Joan S Tucker; Jeremy N V Miles; Brett A Ewing; Regina A Shih; Eric R Pedersen
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in the nation's high schools.

Authors:  Chris Ringwalt; Sean Hanley; Amy A Vincus; Susan T Ennett; Louise A Rohrbach; J Michael Bowling
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2008-11-18

10.  Can implementation support help community-based settings better deliver evidence-based sexual health promotion programs? A randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®.

Authors:  Matthew Chinman; Joie Acosta; Patricia Ebener; Patrick S Malone; Mary E Slaughter
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  1 in total

1.  Getting To Implementation (GTI)-Teach: A seven-step approach for teaching the fundamentals of implementation science.

Authors:  Shari S Rogal; Charles Jonassaint; LauraEllen Ashcraft; Janet Freburger; Vera Yakovchenko; Yasaswi Kislovskiy; Angela Phares; Gretchen Hershberger; David E Goodrich; Matthew Chinman
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-06-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.