Literature DB >> 31863647

Pre-pregnancy dietary arsenic consumption among women in the United States.

Jonathan Suhl1, Kristin M Conway1, Anthony Rhoads1, Peter H Langlois2, Marcia L Feldkamp3, Adrian Michalski4, Paul A Romitti1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arsenic is associated with several adverse health outcomes, including some birth defects. Although diet is the predominant route of arsenic exposure in the United States (U.S.), limited data exist regarding pre-pregnancy dietary arsenic consumption among U.S. women.
METHODS: Using data collected in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS), we estimated daily dietary arsenic consumption during the year before pregnancy for 10,886 mothers of nonmalformed control children delivered from 1997-2011. Responses to the NBDPS dietary assessment and food item estimates of total and inorganic arsenic were used to estimate consumption. Associations between total and inorganic arsenic consumption and selected maternal characteristics were estimated using multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS: Estimates of mean maternal total and inorganic dietary arsenic consumption were 14.9 and 5.2 μg/day, respectively. Several positive and inverse associations with confidence intervals that excluded the null were observed. Comparing mothers in the middle or high total arsenic consumption tertiles to those in the low tertile, we observed positive associations (odds ratios = 1.3-3.8) for maternal age (≥30 years), lower (0-8 years) or higher (>12 years) education, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, other), and early pregnancy drinking with no binge episodes, and inverse associations (odds ratios = 0.4-0.8) for age (<25 years), body mass index (≥30.0 kg/m2 ), and early pregnancy smoking. Findings tended to be similar for inorganic arsenic consumption.
CONCLUSIONS: These contemporary estimates of pre-pregnancy dietary arsenic consumption among U.S. women show associations between both total and inorganic dietary arsenic consumption and several maternal characteristics, improving characterization of the public health impact of this exposure.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arsenic; birth defects; diet; population-based; pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31863647      PMCID: PMC7099603          DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res            Impact factor:   2.661


  16 in total

1.  Arsenic exposure and toxicology: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Michael F Hughes; Barbara D Beck; Yu Chen; Ari S Lewis; David J Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  The National Birth Defects Prevention Study: A review of the methods.

Authors:  Jennita Reefhuis; Suzanne M Gilboa; Marlene Anderka; Marilyn L Browne; Marcia L Feldkamp; Charlotte A Hobbs; Mary M Jenkins; Peter H Langlois; Kimberly B Newsome; Andrew F Olshan; Paul A Romitti; Stuart K Shapira; Gary M Shaw; Sarah C Tinker; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-06-02

Review 3.  Arsenic and human health effects: A review.

Authors:  Khaja Shameem Mohammed Abdul; Sudheera Sammanthi Jayasinghe; Ediriweera P S Chandana; Channa Jayasumana; P Mangala C S De Silva
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.860

4.  FDA Total Diet Study, April 1982-April 1984, dietary intakes of pesticides, selected elements, and other chemicals.

Authors:  E L Gunderson
Journal:  J Assoc Off Anal Chem       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  The cellular metabolism and systemic toxicity of arsenic.

Authors:  D J Thomas; M Styblo; S Lin
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Probabilistic Modeling of Dietary Arsenic Exposure and Dose and Evaluation with 2003-2004 NHANES Data.

Authors:  Jianping Xue; Valerie Zartarian; Sheng-Wei Wang; Shi V Liu; Panos Georgopoulos
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Maternal exposure to arsenic and cadmium and the risk of congenital heart defects in offspring.

Authors:  Xi Jin; Xiaoxian Tian; Zhen Liu; Hui Hu; Xiaohong Li; Ying Deng; Nana Li; Jun Zhu
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.143

8.  Arsenic Content in American Wine.

Authors:  Denise Wilson
Journal:  J Environ Health       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.179

9.  Control selection and participation in an ongoing, population-based, case-control study of birth defects: the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  Mary E Cogswell; Rebecca H Bitsko; Marlene Anderka; Alissa R Caton; Marcia L Feldkamp; Stacey M Hockett Sherlock; Robert E Meyer; Tunu Ramadhani; James M Robbins; Gary M Shaw; T J Mathews; Marjorie Royle; Jennita Reefhuis
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Maternal arsenic exposure and nonsyndromic orofacial clefts.

Authors:  Jonathan Suhl; Stephanie Leonard; Peter Weyer; Anthony Rhoads; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; T Renée Anthony; Trudy L Burns; Kristin M Conway; Peter H Langlois; Paul A Romitti
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 2.344

View more
  1 in total

1.  Arsenic in private well water and birth outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Catherine M Bulka; Molly Scannell Bryan; Melissa A Lombard; Scott M Bartell; Daniel K Jones; Paul M Bradley; Veronica M Vieira; Debra T Silverman; Michael Focazio; Patricia L Toccalino; Johnni Daniel; Lorraine C Backer; Joseph D Ayotte; Matthew O Gribble; Maria Argos
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 13.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.