Literature DB >> 19736223

Control selection and participation in an ongoing, population-based, case-control study of birth defects: the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Mary E Cogswell1, Rebecca H Bitsko, Marlene Anderka, Alissa R Caton, Marcia L Feldkamp, Stacey M Hockett Sherlock, Robert E Meyer, Tunu Ramadhani, James M Robbins, Gary M Shaw, T J Mathews, Marjorie Royle, Jennita Reefhuis.   

Abstract

To evaluate the representativeness of controls in an ongoing, population-based, case-control study of birth defects in 10 centers across the United States, researchers compared 1997-2003 birth certificate data linked to selected controls (n = 6,681) and control participants (n = 4,395) with those from their base populations (n = 2,468,697). Researchers analyzed differences in population characteristics (e.g., percentage of births at > or =2,500 g) for each group. Compared with their base populations, control participants did not differ in distributions of maternal or paternal age, previous livebirths, maternal smoking, or diabetes, but they did differ in other maternal (i.e., race/ethnicity, education, entry into prenatal care) and infant (i.e., birth weight, gestational age, and plurality) characteristics. Differences in distributions of maternal, but not infant, characteristics were associated with participation by selected controls. Absolute differences in infant characteristics for the base population versus control participants were < or =1.3 percentage points. Differences in infant characteristics were greater at centers that selected controls from hospitals compared with centers that selected controls from electronic birth certificates. These findings suggest that control participants in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study generally are representative of their base populations. Hospital-based control selection may slightly underascertain infants affected by certain adverse birth outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19736223     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  83 in total

1.  Medication use during pregnancy, with particular focus on prescription drugs: 1976-2008.

Authors:  Allen A Mitchell; Suzanne M Gilboa; Martha M Werler; Katherine E Kelley; Carol Louik; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Data linkage between the National Birth Defects Prevention Study and the Occupational Information Network (O*NET) to assess workplace physical activity, sedentary behaviors, and emotional stressors during pregnancy.

Authors:  Laura J Lee; Elaine Symanski; Philip J Lupo; Sarah C Tinker; Hilda Razzaghi; Lisa A Pompeii; Adrienne T Hoyt; Mark A Canfield; Wenyaw Chan
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Lack of periconceptional vitamins or supplements that contain folic acid and diabetes mellitus-associated birth defects.

Authors:  Adolfo Correa; Suzanne M Gilboa; Lorenzo D Botto; Cynthia A Moore; Charlotte A Hobbs; Mario A Cleves; Tiffany J Riehle-Colarusso; D Kim Waller; E Albert Reece
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Antioxidant Consumption is Associated with Decreased Odds of Congenital Limb Deficiencies.

Authors:  Nelson D Pace; Tania A Desrosiers; Suzan L Carmichael; Gary M Shaw; Andrew F Olshan; Anna Maria Siega-Riz
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 5.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: epidemiology.

Authors:  Logan G Spector; Julie A Ross; Andrew F Olshan
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Periconceptional maternal alcohol consumption and neural tube defects.

Authors:  Jennifer A Makelarski; Paul A Romitti; Lixian Sun; Trudy L Burns; Charlotte M Druschel; Lucina Suarez; Andrew F Olshan; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Richard S Olney
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2013-03-04

7.  Association of paternal age and risk for major congenital anomalies from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997 to 2004.

Authors:  Ridgely Fisk Green; Owen Devine; Krista S Crider; Richard S Olney; Natalie Archer; Andrew F Olshan; Stuart K Shapira
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Differences in folic acid use, prenatal care, smoking, and drinking in early pregnancy by occupation.

Authors:  A J Agopian; Philip J Lupo; Michele L Herdt-Losavio; Peter H Langlois; Carissa M Rocheleau; Laura E Mitchell
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Association between weight gain during pregnancy and neural tube defects and gastroschisis in offspring.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Suzan L Carmichael; Sarah C Tinker; Gary M Shaw
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-07-27

10.  Maternal caffeine consumption and risk of congenital limb deficiencies.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Erin M Bell; Marilyn L Browne; Charlotte M Druschel; Paul A Romitti; Rebecca J Schmidt; Trudy L Burns; Roxana Moslehi; Richard S Olney
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.