| Literature DB >> 31861267 |
Jing Li1,2, Galit Regev1,2, Sravan Kumar Patel1,2, Dorothy Patton3, Yvonne Sweeney3, Philip Graebing2, Sheila Grab1,2, Lin Wang2, Vinayak Sant1, Lisa C Rohan1,2.
Abstract
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and unintended pregnancy, which can lead to life-threatening complications, are two major burdens for female reproductive health. To address these pressing health issues, multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) are proposed to deliver two or more drugs simultaneously. MPTs could offer several benefits for users such as improved convenience, increased effectiveness, reduced cost, and decreased environmental burden. Here, we report the development, and in vitro and in vivo assessment of a bioadhesive vaginal film as a coitally-independent MPT dosage form for delivering dapivirine (DPV) and levonorgestrel (LNG) to prevent HIV infection and unintended pregnancy, respectively. After confirming the feasibility of bioadhesive film use for weekly drug delivery in vivo through colpophotography and MRI evaluation, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DPV/LNG single entity and combination bioadhesive films was investigated in pigtailed macaques (n = 5). Both drugs from single entity or combination films were able to provide sustained drug release in vivo. The combination film showed lower local tissue clearance for DPV and exhibited significantly increased plasma concentration for LNG as compared to the single entity film. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the ability of this novel bioadhesive film platform to deliver LNG and DPV simultaneously as an MPT product for the prevention of HIV infection and unintended pregnancy.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; bioadhesive vaginal film; contraception; dapivirine; levonorgestrel; multipurpose prevention technologies; unintended pregnancy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31861267 PMCID: PMC7023193 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12010001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Film formulation of quick-dissolving film and bioadhesive film. DPV: dapivirine; LNG: levonorgestrel.
| Component | Bioadhesive Film ( | Quick-Dissolving Film ( |
|---|---|---|
| Milli-Q water | 86.10 | 83.6 |
| Polyvinyl alcohol 40-88 | 7.02 | 7.02 |
| Polyethylene glycol 8000 | 2.34 | 2.34 |
| Methocel E5 | 1.75 | 1.75 |
| Sodium starch glycolate | 0 | 3.5 |
| Thiomer | 1 | 0 |
| Glycerin | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| Propylene glycol | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| Drug (DPV/LNG) | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Figure 1Study design of in vivo assessment of DPV/LNG bioadhesive film for drug delivery. Blood was collected at each time point. (*) indicates the time points for vaginal swab samples collection. (∆) indicates the time points for vaginal and cervical biopsy collection. Films tested: DPV bioadhesive film, LNG bioadhesive film, DPV/LNG combination film.
Characterization of thiomers.
| Chitosan (MWR, kDa) | Synthesis pH | Thiol Degree (µmol/g) | Rate of Solubility in Water |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50–700 | 5 | 183.45 ± 130.29 | +++ |
| 190–310 | 5 | 182.94 ± 31.44 | +++ |
| 190–310 | 6 | 61.83 ± 13.31 | + |
| 190–310 | 7 | 71.26 ± 27.11 | + |
MWR: molecular weight range; +++: dissolves in water very fast (less than 1 h); +: dissolves in water slow (more than 8 h).
Figure 2Mechanism of mucoadhesiveness for thiomers. (a) Scheme for explanation of the interactions between thiomers and mucins. (b) Plastic viscosity evaluation for a mixture of thiomer and mucin with/without adding cysteine and a mixture of chitosan and mucin with/without adding cysteine. Viscosity comparisons were performed between groups of cysteine addition (black bars) and no addition (grey bars) groups. p < 0.0001 (****).
Figure 3Ex vivo tissue toxicity of thiomers. No significant difference was observed between Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and thiomers. N-9 was chosen as a positive control. Values indicate mean ± SD with triplicates. NS: No significant difference. (n = 3, * p < 0.05).
Physicochemical characteristics of quick-dissolving film and bioadhesive multipurpose prevention technologies (MPT) films.
| Characterizations | DPV Quick-Dissolving Film | DPV Bioadhesive Film | LNG Bioadhesive Film | DPV/LNG MPT Bioadhesive Film |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | White, transparent, smooth, and soft | White, transparent, smooth, and soft | White, transparent, smooth, and soft | White, transparent, smooth, and soft |
| Weight (mg) | 69.20 ± 1.76 | 69.35 ± 5.9 | 79.14 ± 8.8 | 65.85 ± 3.93 |
| Thickness (µm) | 155.90 ± 9.75 | 110.75 ± 12.06 | 127.5 ± 11.8 | 105.28 ± 6.96 |
| Water Content % ( | 4.87 ± 0.20 | 6.68 ± 0.43 | 4.95 ± 0.17 | 6.36 ± 0.50 |
| Drug content (mg/film) | 1.41 ± 0.13 | 1.68 ± 0.15 | 1.80 ± 0.09 | 1.71 ± 0.15/DPV |
| Drug loading % ( | 2.04 ± 0.19 | 2.42 ± 0.22 | 2.27 ± 0.11 | 2.60 ± 0.23/DPV |
| Puncture Strength (Kg/mm) | 3.77 ± 0.58 | 12.41 ± 0.44 | 14.18 ± 2.28 | 13.03 ± 0.50 |
| Disintegration (sec) | 56.36 ± 6.49 | 153.12 ± 33.81 | 211.33 ± 70.52 | 228.44 ± 77.46 |
Figure 4In vitro dissolution of films. (a) Cumulative DPV release from quick-dissolving film and bioadhesive film in 1% Cremophor® EL in Milli-Q water. (b) Cumulative DPV/LNG release from single entity and combination films in 40% of acetonitrile in Milli-Q water.
Figure 5Ex vivo mucoadhesiveness of quick-dissolving and bioadhesive films on porcine intestinal mucosal tissues. (a) Tensile force for detachment of quick-dissolving and bioadhesive films from mucosal tissues. (b) Work of adhesion (area under the curve of tensile force vs. distance) as measurement of mucoadhesiveness of quick-dissolving and bioadhesive films (n = 4, * p < 0.5, *** p < 0.005).
Figure 6Tissue retention and distribution of bioadhesive film and quick-dissolving film in macaque model. Representative colposcope image for blue dye loaded bioadhesive film and quick-dissolving film in macaque vaginal compartment (red star marks the last presence of film in vaginal cavity).
In vivo release of DPV from bioadhesive film and quick-dissolving film formulations.
| Bioadhesive Film | Quick-Dissolving Film | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days of Detection | Number of Macaques | % above LLOQ | Median (Range) | Number of Macaques | % above LLOQ | Median (Range) |
| Day 1 | 5 | 100 | 12.3 (2.87–36.71) | 5 | 100 | 18.56 (10.18–69.92) |
| Day 2 | 5 | 100 | 2.62 (0.91–24.63) | 5 | 100 | 1.68 (1.51–2.85) |
| Day 3 | 5 | 100 | 0.49 (0.21–11.32) | 5 | 100 | 0.49 (0.4–1.62) |
| Day 4 | 5 | 100 | 0.40 (0.11–20.03) | 5 | 100 | 0.21 (0.11–0.52) |
| Day 7 | 5 | 40 | 33.01 (0.1–64.41) | ND | ND | ND |
ND: not detectable; LLOQ: lower limit of quantification.
Figure 7Distribution of bioadhesive and quick-dissolving films in macaque vaginal cavity (red arrow indicates the dispersion of film, n = 3).
Figure 8In vivo assessment of DPV/LNG single entity film and combination film in pigtailed macaque models. (a) DPV drug level in vaginal swab over time for single film and combination film. (b) LNG drug level in vaginal swab over time for single film and combination film (* p < 0.5).
DPV concentration in vaginal swab, and vaginal and cervical tissue for DPV single and DPV/LNG combo films.
| DPV | 6 h | Day 1 | Day 4 | Day 7 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Macaques | % above LLOQ | Median (Range) | Number of Macaques | % above LLOQ | Median (Range) | Number of Macaques | % above LLOQ | Median (Range) | Number of Macaques | % above LLOQ | Median (Range) | |
| Vaginal swab | ||||||||||||
| Single film | 3 | 100 | 86744.53 (64936.83–108126.9) | 5 | 100 | 11327.68 (664.89–19245.81) | 5 | 80 | 82.80 (0.1–8656.03) | 5 | 60 | 1.53 (0.1–5339.14) |
| Combo film | 3 | 100 | 49154.43 (21220.13–105228.6) | 5 | 100 | 27022.57 (4573.604–41360.52) | 5 | 100 | 2039.18 (81.76–20154.96) | 5 | 80 | 26.34 (0.1–34.133) |
| Vaginal tissue | ||||||||||||
| Single film | 3 | 100 | 6425 (2571–13071) | 2 | 100 | 925.5 (107–1744) | 2 | 100 | 1768 (361–3175) | 3 | 100 | 215 (101–735) |
| Combo film | 3 | 66.7 | 21238 (0.1–213096) | 2 | 100 | 10331.5 (7452–13211) | 2 | 100 | 2851.5 (1759–3944) | 3 | 66.7 | 495 (0.1–605) |
| Cervical tissue | ||||||||||||
| Single film | 3 | 100 | 2424 (359–4138) | 2 | 100 | 297.5 (264–331) | 2 | 100 | 478 (141–815) | 3 | 100 | 342 (201–626) |
| Combo film | 3 | 100 | 5390 (2959–10194) | 2 | 100 | 6698 (2206–11190) | 2 | 100 | 5581 (3258–7904) | 3 | 100 | 93.9 (32.7–1943) |
Single film: DPV-containing film; combo film: DPV and LNG-containing film; values are presented as ng/g for vaginal swab, ng/g for vaginal and cervical tissue.
LNG concentration in vaginal swab, and vaginal and cervical tissue for LNG single and DPV/LNG combo films.
| LNG | 6 h | Day 1 | Day 4 | Day 7 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Macaques | % above LLOQ | Median (Range) | Number of Macaques | % above LLOQ | Median (Range) | Number of Macaques | % above LLOQ | Median (Range) | Number of Macaques | % above LLOQ | Median (Range) | |
| Vaginal swab | ||||||||||||
| Single film | 3 | 100 | 16819.47 (10601.74–45273.93) | 5 | 100 | 12623.8 (43223.21–411886.5) | 5 | 100 | 2888.28 (50.26–29221.25) | 5 | 100 | 4663.56 (84.98–97194.82) |
| Combo film | 3 | 100 | 6533.28 (4390.29–14106.52) | 5 | 100 | 11317.51 (210.43–16382.36) | 5 | 100 | 12.52 (3.11–3703.99) | 5 | 20 | 0.1 (0.1–2.81) |
| Vaginal tissue | ||||||||||||
| Single film | 3 | 100 | 1631 (444–19086) | 2 | 100 | 21344 (13300–29388) | 2 | 100 | 3901.5 (1062–6741) | 3 | 100 | 188 (103–226) |
| Combo film | 3 | 100 | 5548 (473–132699) | 2 | 100 | 1785 (1168–2402) | 2 | 100 | 303 (102–504) | 3 | 66.7 | 264 (0.1–679) |
| Cervical tissue | ||||||||||||
| Single film | 3 | 100 | 7258.5 (3059–11458) | 2 | 100 | 7582.5 (6759–8406) | 2 | 100 | 9335.5 (4620–14051) | 3 | 100 | 154 (118–166) |
| Combo film | 3 | 100 | 2771.85 (2273–3450) | 2 | 100 | 1987.5 (873–3102) | 2 | 100 | 901.42 (554–1248.84) | 3 | 66.7 | 13.9 (0.1–222) |
Single film: LNG-containing film; combo film: DPV and LNG-containing film; values are presented as ng/g for vaginal swab, ng/g for vaginal and cervical tissue.
Figure 9Plasma levels of LNG for single and combination bioadhesive films. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests for each time point. (* p < 0.05, n = 5).