Literature DB >> 15588115

Benefit-risk assessment of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception.

Tiina Backman1.   

Abstract

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS) is a long-acting, fully reversible method of contraception. It is one of the most effective forms of contraception available, and combines the advantages of both hormonal and intrauterine contraception. The levonorgestrel-releasing IUS also gives the users many non-contraceptive benefits: the amount of menstrual bleeding and the number of days of menstrual bleeding are reduced, which makes it suitable for the treatment of menorrhagia (heavy menstrual blood loss). Dysmenorrhoea (painful menstruation) and premenstrual symptoms are also relieved. In addition, the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS provides protection for the endometrium during hormone replacement therapy. The local release of levonorgestrel into the uterine cavity results in a strong uniform suppression of the endometrial epithelium as the epithelium becomes insensitive to estradiol released from the ovaries. This accounts for the reduction in menstrual blood loss. All possible patterns of bleeding are seen among users of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS; however, most of the women who experience total amenorrhoea continue to ovulate. The first months of use are often characterised by irregular, scanty bleeding, which in most cases resolves spontaneously. The menstrual pattern and fertility return to normal soon after the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS is removed. The contraceptive efficacy is high with 5-year failure rates of 0.5-1.1 per 100 users. The absolute number of ectopic pregnancies is low, as is the rate per 1000 users. The levonorgestrel-releasing IUS is equally effective in all age groups and the bodyweight of the user is not associated with failure of the method. In Western cultures continuance rates among users of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS are comparable with those of other long-term methods of contraception. Premature removal of the device is most often associated with heavy menstrual bleeding and pain, as with other long-term methods of contraception, and is most common in the youngest age group. When adequately counselled about the benign nature of oligo- or amenorrhoea, most women are very willing to accept life without menstruation. The risk of premature removal can be markedly diminished with good pre-insertion counselling, which also markedly increases user satisfaction. User satisfaction is strongly associated with the information given at the time of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS insertion. Thus, the benefits of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS make it a very suitable method of contraception for most women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15588115     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200427150-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  159 in total

Review 1.  IUDs: which device?

Authors:  Jo Dennis; Naomi Hampton
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2002-04

2.  Plasma levels of d-norgestrel after oral administration.

Authors:  E Weiner; A Victor; E D Johansson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis.

Authors:  L Fedele; S Bianchi; G Zanconato; A Portuese; R Raffaelli
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Effective contraception with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 12-month report of a European multicenter study.

Authors:  T Luukkainen; H Allonen; M Haukkamaa; P Holma; T Pyörälä; J Terho; J Toivonen; I Batar; L Lampe; K Andersson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Intrauterine device usage and fetal loss.

Authors:  H Foreman; B V Stadel; S Schlesselman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  The incidence of actinomyces-like organisms in Papanicolaou-stained smears of copper- and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices.

Authors:  G S Merki-Feld; E Lebeda; B Hogg; P J Keller
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Bleeding patterns and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) up to two years.

Authors:  Margarete Hidalgo; Luis Bahamondes; Marcos Perrotti; Juan Diaz; Cecilia Dantas-Monteiro; Carlos Petta
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Intrauterine contraception with copper and with levonorgestrel: a randomized study of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.

Authors:  I Sivin; F Alvarez; J Diaz; S Diaz; S el Mahgoub; E Coutinho; V Brache; M M Diaz; A Faundes; M Pavez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective.

Authors:  T M Farley; M J Rosenberg; P J Rowe; J H Chen; O Meirik
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Morphological and functional features of endometrial decidualization following long-term intrauterine levonorgestrel delivery.

Authors:  H O Critchley; H Wang; R L Jones; R W Kelly; T A Drudy; A E Gebbie; C H Buckley; A S McNeilly; A F Glasier
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  10 in total

1.  Estimated economic impact of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system on unintended pregnancy in active duty women.

Authors:  Ryan J Heitmann; Sunni L Mumford; Micah J Hill; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Uterine perforation with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: analysis of reports from four national pharmacovigilance centres.

Authors:  Kees van Grootheest; Bernhardt Sachs; Mira Harrison-Woolrych; Pia Caduff-Janosa; Eugène van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Hormonal contraception and HIV-positive women: metabolic concerns and management strategies.

Authors:  Julie Womack; Susan Richman; Phyllis C Tien; Margaret Grey; Ann Williams
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Embracing post-fertilisation methods of family planning: a call to action.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Raymond; Francine Coeytaux; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Kirsten Moore; James Trussell; Beverly Winikoff
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2013-10

5.  The wandering Mirena: laparoscopic retrieval.

Authors:  Mark Erian; Glenda McLaren; David Baartz
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Predictors of modern contraceptive use during the postpartum period among women in Uganda: a population-based cross sectional study.

Authors:  Gideon Rutaremwa; Allen Kabagenyi; Stephen Ojiambo Wandera; Tapiwa Jhamba; Edith Akiror; Hellen Laetitia Nviiri
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Hormonal contraception in women with migraine: is progestogen-only contraception a better choice?

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Gabriele S Merki-Feld; Erica Terreno; Alice Pellegrinelli; Michele Viana
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 7.277

8.  The comorbidities of dysmenorrhea: a clinical survey comparing symptom profile in women with and without endometriosis.

Authors:  Susan F Evans; Tiffany A Brooks; Adrian J Esterman; M Louise Hull; Paul E Rolan
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Comparison of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device with oral progestins in heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) cases with uterine leiomyoma (LNG-IUD and oral progestin usage in myoma uteri).

Authors:  Ayse Kavasoglu Tosun; Ismet Tosun; Necdet Suer
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  Rational Design of a Multipurpose Bioadhesive Vaginal Film for Co-Delivery of Dapivirine and Levonorgestrel.

Authors:  Jing Li; Galit Regev; Sravan Kumar Patel; Dorothy Patton; Yvonne Sweeney; Philip Graebing; Sheila Grab; Lin Wang; Vinayak Sant; Lisa C Rohan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.321

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.