| Literature DB >> 31861252 |
Huisong Wang1,2, Guangchang Pang1.
Abstract
It is unclear whether different processing methods change the biological functions of foods and how these functions are evaluated in the human body. Here, steamed bread and baked bread, the traditional staple foods in China and many Western countries, were made by steaming and baking, respectively, using one piece of fermented wheat dough and then consumed by 16 healthy young volunteers. By detecting 38 cytokines, 12 metabolic enzymes, glucose, lactate, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) in the serum, the cytokine network and central metabolic pathway network were investigated to compare the effects of the two staple foods on immunity and metabolism. Compared with steamed bread, baked bread increased (p < 0.05) concentrations of fractalkine and macrophage-derived chemokine, decreased (p < 0.05) the concentration of interleukin-1RA, increased (p < 0.05) the expression level of phosphofructokinase, and decreased (p < 0.05) the expression level of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in the serum. Two network analyses indicated that baked bread, as compared to the steamed bread, enhanced communication between immune cells, increased catabolism, and decreased anabolism. Further, a correlation analysis of cytokines and metabolic enzymes suggested that the two staple foods may affect metabolism by regulating the secretion of cytokines. These findings highlight how the same raw food material processed by different methods may have different impacts on immunity and metabolism in humans.Entities:
Keywords: Baked bread; Cytokine network; Human; Metabolic network; Steamed bread
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31861252 PMCID: PMC7019488 DOI: 10.3390/nu12010001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Central metabolic pathway metabolic network diagram containing the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas (EMP) pathway, phosphopentose pathway (PPP), and tricaboxylic acid (TCA) cycle pathway. Ac-CoA, acetyl coenzyme A; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; PYR, pyruvate; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate.
Metabolic flux model equation.
| Intermediate Metabolites | Mass Balance Equations |
|---|---|
| Glucose-6-phosphate | X1 = r1 − r2 − r3 |
| Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate | X2 = r3 − r4 |
| Pyruvate | X3 = r4 − r5 − r6 |
| Acetyl Coenzyme A | X4 = r6 − r7 |
Figure 2Serum cytokine concentrations. Values are mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3The expression levels of 12 enzymes in the serum. Values are mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Figure 4Effects of steamed bread and baked bread on the cytokine network (a) and central metabolic pathway metabolic network (b). In the cytokine network, the thickness of the lines represents the strength of intercellular communication (the concentration change rate of cytokine i); the red line represents enhanced communication, and the blue line represents inhibited communication; the arrow represents the direction from secretory cell to the target cell. In the metabolic network, the thickness of the line represents the quantitative metabolic pathway flux; the arrow represents the direction of metabolic flux. The correlation analysis between the changed (versus control) cytokines and the metabolic enzymes were assessed by Pearson’s correlation test. The correlation is given by r value. The red line represents a significant (p < 0.05) positive correlation and the blue line represents a significant (p < 0.05) negative correlation.
The input and output strengths of each cell and the total strength in the cytokine network. 1.
| Immune Cells | Output/Input | Nonimmune Cells | Output/Input | Total Network Strength ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nodes Strength 2 | Nodes Number | Nodes Strength 2 | Nodes Number | ||||
|
| Th1 | 2.18/−2.15 | 15/23 | Fibroblast | −3.99/11.89 | 21/20 | 36.39 |
| Th2 | 3.72/−6.65 | 15/22 | Hematopoietic stem cell | 0/11.83 | 0/15 | ||
| Monocyte | 0.24/4.65 | 19/22 | Endothelial cell | −1.27/−7.20 | 18/15 | ||
| Macrophage | 0.24/4.65 | 19/22 | Smooth muscle cell | 0.52/−5.15 | 19/8 | ||
| Natural killer cell | −3.90/−2.11 | 16/19 | Osteoblast | 2.63/4.38 | 10/14 | ||
| B cell | 0.24/−3.34 | 19/17 | Astrocyte | −5.12/−2.18 | 16/4 | ||
| Neutrophil | −3.24/15.87 | 9/15 | Stromal cell | 2.70/0 | 14/0 | ||
| Eosinophil | −0.12/4.27 | 12/23 | Thyroid cell | 0/−2.18 | 0/4 | ||
| Basophil | 4.14/−6.86 | 14/18 | Epithelial cell | −0.09/−2.18 | 15/4 | ||
| Dendritic cell | 0.33/10.10 | 18/13 | Synovial cell | 2.63/0 | 10/0 | ||
| Mast cell | 5.36/−0.80 | 14/22 | Chondrocyte | 2.63/0 | 10/0 | ||
| Cytotoxic T lymphocyte | 0/−11.21 | 0/13 | Adipocyte | 2.63/0 | 10/0 | ||
| Microglia | 2.63/2.56 | 10/18 | |||||
| Thymocyte | 3.09/0 | 12/0 | |||||
|
| Th1 | 6.31/2.60 | 14/10 | Fibroblast | 0/3.16 | 10/6 | 98.54 |
| Th2 | 6.31/−4.5 | 12/6 | Hematopoietic stem cell | 0/3.16 | 0/6 | ||
| Monocyte | 2.10/7.50 | 11/12 | Endothelial cell | 6.31/−0.07 | 12/12 | ||
| Macrophage | 10.11/8.91 | 17/10 | Smooth muscle cell | 1.70/−4.5 | 4/6 | ||
| Natural killer cell | 0/1.26 | 10/3 | Osteoblast | 0/3.16 | 0/6 | ||
| B-cell | 2.10/−1.34 | 11/10 | Astrocyte | 0/1.28 | 0/3 | ||
| Neutrophil | 0/8.91 | 0/10 | Stromal cell | 1.70/0 | 4/0 | ||
| Eosinophil | 0/3.16 | 0/6 | Myoblast | 0/1.28 | 0/3 | ||
| Basophil | 0/7.66 | 0/10 | |||||
| Mast cell | 6.31/0 | 12/0 | |||||
| Dendritic cell | 6.31/7.66 | 12/10 | |||||
1 Original computing matrices are shown in the Supplementary Materials. 2 Node strength was the total of the strength of the adjacent edges.
Serum glucose, lactate, and NADH levels.
| Items | Control | Steamed Bread | Baked Bread | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 89.14 ± 2.99 | 88.94 ± 2.46 | 87.67 ± 2.88 |
| Lactate (mg/dL) | 22.76 ± 0.88 | 21.00 ± 0.85 | 24.63 ± 1.01 | |
| NADH (mg/L) | 38.70 ± 7.29 | 69.26 ± 12.54 | 33.31 ± 6.23 | |
|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 91.78 ± 1.65 | 79.15 ± 1.61 | 84.29 ± 2.76 |
| Lactate (mg/dL) | 19.57 ± 0.91 | 17.35 ± 0.82 | 17.73 ± 0.95 | |
| NADH (mg/L) | 62.29 ± 9.40 | 53.73 ± 9.65 | 61.51 ± 8.55 | |