Synthesis of [3,3-2H2]-Dihydroartemisinic Acid to Measure the Rate of Nonenzymatic Conversion of Dihydroartemisinic Acid to Artemisinin.

Dihydroartemisinic acid is the biosynthetic precursor to artemisinin, the endoperoxide-containing natural product used to treat malaria. The conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin is a cascade reaction that involves C-C bond cleavage, hydroperoxide incorporation, and polycyclization to form the endoperoxide. Whether or not this reaction is enzymatically controlled has been controversial. A method was developed to quantify the nonenzymatic conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin using LC-MS. A seven-step synthesis of 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) was accomplished beginning with dihydroartemisinic acid (1). The nonenzymatic rates of formation of 3,3-dideuteroartemisinin (24) from 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) were 1400 ng/day with light and 32 ng/day without light. Moreover, an unexpected formation of nondeuterated artemisinin (3) from 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) was detected in both the presence and absence of light. This formation of nondeuterated artemisinin (3) from its dideuterated precursor (23) suggests an alternative mechanistic pathway that operates independent of light to form artemisinin, involving the loss of the two C-3 deuterium atoms.

Artemisinin is the endoperoxide-containing natural product used to treat malaria.[1] Dihydroartemisinic acid is the biosynthetic precursor to artemisinin.[2] The conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin has been controversial in regard to whether or not the transformation is enzymatic in Artemisia annua, with evidence supporting both an enzymatic process[3−5] and a nonenzymatic process.[6,7] Our results confirmed the spontaneous, nonenzymatic conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin (Figure , 1 to 3). Subsequently, a method was developed to quantify the rate of conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin using an internal standard to quantify product formation via an LC-MS method.

Figure 1

Formation of artemisinin (3) from dihydroartemisinic acid (1) through an allylic hydroperoxide intermediate (2). The numbering shown in structure 3 is the numbering system based on the carbon backbone in dihydroartemisinic acid (2), as has been previously reported,[14] and shown in parentheses is the alternative numbering for artemisinin.[13] To avoid confusion, the results from this article (Figure ) will refer to the numbering system shown in the former structure.[14]

Figure 4

(A) Time course of spontaneous conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid (1) to artemisinin (3). 1H NMR spectra overlay of time course experiment in (B) the light and (C) the dark. The hemiacetal proton of artemisinin appears at δ 5.88. The vinylic proton of dihydroartemisinic acid appears at δ 5.12 in CDCl3 solvent at 500 MHz. A time point of zero days and no artemisinin was detected at δ 5.88 (the NMR sample was prepared immediately after the dried compound was dissolved in 0.7 mL of CDCl3) (Supporting Information). (D) Mechanism of the possible formation of dihydro-epi-deoxyarteannuin B (X) from dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide (2) through an intramolecular SN2′ displacement of H2O2 by the carboxylic acid nucleophile, which could explain the observation of the chemical shift at δ 5.64 (circled peak in Figure B).

Dihydroartemisinic acid, which was isolated from A. annua,[2] is believed to be the biosynthetic precursor to artemisinin (3), the endoperoxide-containing natural product used to treat malaria (Figure ). Dihydroartemisinic acid (1) was previously converted to artemisinin in the presence and absence of chlorophyll A; the production of artemisinin was reported as a percentage of conversion.[2] The endoperoxide of artemisinin is what confers its antimalarial activity, and therefore, many studies have developed methods to efficiently convert dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin.[8−10] The isolation of dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide (2) from A. annua has been reported,[11] suggesting that this hydroperoxide is an intermediate to endoperoxide formation (2 to 3). Dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide (2) can also be formed by treating dihydroartemisinic acid with singlet oxygen, i.e., irradiating a CH2Cl2 solution of dihydroartemisinic acid in the presence of methylene blue and O2.[12] This resulting hydroperoxide has been shown to convert to artemisinin (2 to 3) over 4 days in 17% yield.[12] In a mechanistic study related to the conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide to artemisinin (2 to 3), in trifluoroacetic acid/petroleum ether medium yielded 25% of artemisinin.[13] Both dihydroartemisinic acid and its hydroperoxide have been shown to convert to artemisinin (1 to 3 and 2 to 3) in CDCl3 when each starting material was stored in an NMR tube over extended periods of time (“several weeks”).[6] The rate of formation of artemisinin was reported as a percentage through integration of the 1H NMR signals. Additionally, no raw NMR spectroscopic data of the compounds have been reported of this time course monitoring the conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid into artemisinin.[6]

Major efforts have been made to identify the endoperoxide forming enzyme in A. annua.[4,5] Artemisinin is found primarily in the glandular trichomes of A. annua. Proteomic[4] and transcriptomic[5] studies have identified the abundance of a peroxidase protein and mRNA, suggesting that this peroxidase is the enzyme that converts dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin. Other studies using recombinant expression of peroxidase of A. annua have shown the inability to convert artemisinic acid to artemisinin on its own, but this reaction was enabled when plant tissue was added.[3] Although these studies suggest the possibility of the existence of an endoperoxide forming enzyme (i.e., conversion of 1 to 3, Figure ), the nonenzymatic formation[6,7,13] of the endoperoxide in artemisinin has also been reported (vide infra).

Because the endoperoxide moiety of artemisinin confers its antimalarial properties, how the endoperoxide bridge is formed from dihydroartemisinic acid has been a topic of interest for decades. The first step is thought to involve an ene reaction with singlet oxygen to form dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide (Figure A, 1 to 4). The subsequent steps involve the C–C bond cleavage step and reaction with triplet oxygen to form the peroxide intermediate, which cyclizes to form artemisinin (shown in Figures B–F). In a study that involved the use of 18O2-gas and the dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide in the presence of acid in Et2O,[13]13C NMR spectroscopy was used to analyze the carbon signals of the formed artemisinin. The significant upfield shift of C-3 and C-12a (C-4 and C-6 of 3 in Figure ) confirmed that the endoperoxide oxygen comes from molecular oxygen reacting with the hydroperoxide intermediate (Figures D, E, and F). This observation rules out mechanisms B and C (Figures B and C), where the oxygens in the endoperoxide bridge come from the hydroperoxide oxygens (Figure , 8). Mechanisms D, E, and F (Figure D, E, and F) show that the oxygen atoms in the endoperoxide bridge (Figure D–F, 15 and 19) come from molecular oxygen when starting with dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide (Figure D–F, 4). Mechanism D shows a ring expansion of the hydroperoxide intermediate (Figure D, 4) to form an initial oxocarbocation (11 via Hock cleavage[15]), which is hydrated to form a hemiketal 12. The hemiketal is in equilibrium with the acyclic enolic carbonyl isomer (13). This intermediate is reacting with triplet oxygen to form the hydroperoxide 14, which cyclizes to form the endoperoxide 15. Mechanism E shows a homolytic cleavage of the C-4–C-5 bond to directly form intermediate 16. Mechanism F shows the formation of a dioxetane intermediate (Figure F, 18) and simultaneous attack of triplet oxygen.[13] The dioxetane rearranges to intermediate 17, which cyclizes to form endoperoxide 19. Based on previous 18O2 studies with dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide,[13] the resulting artemisinin product had a distribution of nonlabeled, monolabeled, and dilabeled products (with 18O atoms) in a ratio of 53:100:43 as determined by mass spectrometry and 65:100:48, which was determined by 13C NMR spectroscopy.[13] The observation that two 18O atoms are incorporated into artemisinin only supports mechanisms E and F (Figure ). The formation of monolabeled and unlabeled artemisinin products could be explained by the fact that the carbonyl oxygens of intermediates 17 and 14 (Figure ) exchange with water in the medium (Figure A and B), resulting in the loss of the 18O atoms in the carbonyl functional groups.

Figure 2

Dihydroartemisinic acid is converted to its hydroperoxide in the presence of singlet oxygen (A, 1 to 4). The mechanisms of endoperoxide formation from dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide (B–F). Mechanisms B and C were ruled out in a previous study[13] when dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide (4) in the presence of 18O2 gas confirmed that the oxygens in the endoperoxide bridge did not come from singlet oxygen. Instead, the source of these oxygens is triplet oxygen.

Figure 3

Explanation of the observation of a mixture of unlabeled and mono-18O-incorporated artemisinin products consistent with the mechanisms shown in Figure E and F. (A) Formation of the gem-diol at the ketocarbonyl group (20) to result in the loss of its 18O atom group. (B) Formation of the gem-diol at the formyl group (21) to result in the loss of its 18O atom (14 to 22).

Despite extensive mechanistic studies of endoperoxide formation in artemisinin from dihydroartemisinic hydroperoxide, the biosynthetic conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin (Figure , 1 to 3) has remained controversial (vide supra). Although singlet oxygen has been shown to be the source of hydroperoxide functionality (Figure A, 1 to 4)[13] and is subsequently transformed into artemisinin in acidic medium, there has also been evidence of direct conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin (Figure , 1 to 3) after storage of dihydroartemisinic acid in the freezer (−20 °C) in the absence of light for six months.[7]

The purpose of this investigation was to develop a method to quantify the rate of spontaneous formation of artemisinin from dihydroartemisinic acid (Figure , 3 from 1). Initial pilot studies involved monitoring artemisinin production through 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure ). Monitoring the reaction by 1H NMR spectroscopy resulted in the observation of artemisinin formation through the appearance of the C-5-acetal proton at δ 5.88 ppm, but the signal-to-noise ratio was too low to measure an accurate amount of artemisinin (Figure and Supporting Information). Therefore, we synthesized a 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid isotopologue (Figure , 23) and monitored the formation of 3,3-dideuteroartemisinin (24) while using nondeuterated artemisinin as an internal standard. The use of an internal standard with a known amount of artemisinin permitted the quantification of artemisinin formation through LC-HRMS data.

Figure 5

Schematic showing the use of 3,3-d2-dihydroartemisinic acid (23) to measure the rate of nonenzymatic conversion to d2-artemisinin (24) using d0-artemisinin (3) as the internal standard.

Results and Discussion

NMR Experiment to Qualitatively Monitor the Rate of Conversion from Dihydroartemisinic Acid to Artemisinin

In order to firmly establish conditions of spontaneous conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin (1 to 3), a time course experiment was performed (Figure ). Dried aliquots of dihydroartemisinic acid in either clear glass vials or amber glass vials were stored and open to air for different periods of time. The clear glass vials were exposed to sunlight, and the amber vials were stored in a dark cabinet.

The time course experiments using NMR spectroscopy confirmed the spontaneous formation of artemisinin from dihydroartemisinic acid when dihydroartemisinic acid was stored in vials open to air (Figure ). Interestingly, the expected chemical shift for dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide (H-5 proton should appear at δ 5.26)[11] possibly appeared at the 10-day time point (δ 5.24, slightly upfield of the satellite peak of H-5 proton of dihydroartemisinic acid). However, the area of this peak was insignificant relative to the proton of artemisinin (δ 5.88) and did not exactly match the expected chemical shift of dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide. Furthermore, a proton with a chemical shift of δ 5.64 was present (Figure B, circled peak at the 7-day time point). This proton with a chemical shift of δ 5.64 matches the chemical shift of the vinyl proton of dihydro-epi-deoxyarteannuin B (Figure D, X).[16] Furthermore, in a previous study, which involved the long-term storage of a solution of dihydroartemisinic acid (1) in CDCl3, dihydroartemisinic acid (1) was converted to dihydro-epi-deoxyarteannuin B (X).[6] As suggested previously,[6] dihydro-epi-deoxyarteannuin B (X) is formed from an intramolecular SN2′ displacement of hydrogen peroxide by the carboxylic acid moiety in dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide (2). The mechanism of the intramolecular SN2′ displacement of hydrogen peroxide to form dihydro-epi-deoxyarteannuin B (X) is shown in Figure D.

In this time course (Figure ), the detection of artemisinin (3) was confirmed by the presence of the hemiacetal proton at δ 5.88. Although other diagnostic peaks of artemisinin were present (e.g., multiplet at δ 3.5), the integration of these proton signals relative to dihydroartemisinic acid was small (i.e., the ratio of the integrals of the hemiacetal proton of artemisinin to the vinylic proton of dihydroartemisinic acid, which appears at δ 5.12, was 1 to ∼100). The significant difference in relative peak areas between artemisinin and dihydroartemisinic acid coupled with the low signal-to-noise level of the methine proton of artemisinin (δ 5.88) made it difficult to accurately quantify the formation of artemisinin (i.e., Figure B and C). Nonetheless, this set of time course experiments using 1H NMR spectroscopy was helpful in approximating the time to detect a significant amount of artemisinin formation when a dried sample of dihydroartemisinic acid was left open to air. Artemisinin formation from dihydroartemisinic acid (3 from 1) was clearly detected at 7 days with the appearance of the C-5-methine proton at δ 5.88 (Figure B). Moreover, another time course was performed, which involved dissolving dihydroartemisinic acid (1) in CDCl3 and acquiring the 1H NMR spectra at various time points (Supporting Information). Artemisinin was eventually formed but at a slower rate (i.e., no artemisinin was detected after 11 days). When artemisinin was detected (day 32 and day 35), a number of other peaks were also detected, suggesting decomposition of the parent compound (1) to a complex mixture (Supporting Information). In contrast, the dry conditions used in Figure showed primarily artemisinin as the main product without decomposition to other products. However, the signal-to-noise level of the peak corresponding to artemisinin was not high enough to quantitatively measure the rate of artemisinin production (Figure B and C).

Therefore, in order to quantify the conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin (1 to 3), we were interested in developing a new method to measure the rate of formation of artemisinin from dihydroartemisinic acid using an LC-MS method and an internal standard (Figure ). This strategy involved the synthesis of dideuterated dihydroartemisinic acid (Figure , 23). To measure the rate of conversion from dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin, the 3,3-dideuterated dihydroartemisinic acid isotopologue would undergo (i) a time course involving a dried sample of dideuterated dihydroartemisinic acid (23) open to air in a vial to allow for spontanenous formation of dideuterated artemisinin (24), (ii) an extraction protocol involving the addition of an internal standard with a known amount of nondeuterated artemisinin (3), and (iii) analysis of d2- and d0-artemisinin by an LC-HRMS method (Figure ).

Chemical Synthesis of 3,3-Dideuterodihydroartemisinic Acid (23) from Dihydroartemisinic Acid (1)

The retrosynthetic analysis of 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (Figure , 23) involves the incorporation of the two deuteriums at the C-3-position of an enone intermediate (Figure , 25). This enone intermediate (25) would be derived from commercially available dihydroartemisinic acid (Figure , 1), where the C12-carboxylic acid would be masked with a protecting group and the C-3-position would be oxidized at the C-3-position to yield the C-3-ketone (25).

Figure 6

Retrosynthetic analysis of 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) from dihydroartemisinic acid (1).

The allylic oxidation at C-3 of artemisinic acid to yield 3-hydroxyartemisinic acid is known.[14] In the previous study, Acton reported the use of SeO2 to incorporate the (3R) absolute configuration in 3-hydroxyartemisinic acid. The (3R) configuration was confirmed through comparison of a known compound from a microbial transformation of artemisinic acid,[17] which resulted in the formation of both (3R)- and (3S)-hydroxyartemisinic acid and assigned through 2D NOESY experiments that showed a correlation between H-3 and H-10 in the (3S)-hydroxyartemisinic acid.[17,18] Nonetheless, we were interested in synthetically accessing the C-3-allylic alcohol derivative to subsequently oxidize and form an enone intermediate. The resulting enone would react with LiAlD4 and AlCl3[19] to potentially yield the dideuterated compound (i.e., Figure , 25 to 23). Initially, dihydroartemisinic acid was treated with LiAlH4 to afford dihydroartemisinic alcohol[20] (Scheme , 1 to 26), which was protected as the tert-butyldimethylsilyl (TBDMS) ether 27 (Scheme ). Subsequent oxidation at the C-3 allylic methylene by refluxing alkene 27 with SeO2 in EtOH–H2O (9:1, v/v) resulted in both cleavage of the TBDMS ether and allylic oxidation to afford diol 28. Diol 28 was crystallized, which allowed for assignment of the (3R) absolute configuration (Figure A, crystal structure of diol 28).

Scheme 1

Preliminary Studies Using TBDMS Ether 27 for the Allylic Oxidation with SeO2 to Give Diol 28

Figure 7

Crystal structures of diol 28 and diene 32.

Since the TBDMS ether protecting group was labile during the allylic oxidation conditions with SeO2 (Scheme , 27 to 28), the primary hydroxy group of dihydroartemisinic alcohol was protected as the acetate (Scheme , 26 to 29). The resulting acetate (29) was oxidized at C-3 using SeO2, which kept the 12-acetoxy group intact. The resulting allylic alcohol (30) was oxidized with Dess–Martin periodinane to afford enone 31. Enone 31 was reduced with AlCl3 and LiAlD4 to yield a mixture of the elimination product 32 (Figure B, crystal structure of 32) and 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic alcohol 33. Alcohol 33 was oxidized with Dess–Martin periodinane to yield 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic aldehyde (34). The aldehyde 34 was oxidized under Pinnick oxidation conditions to afford 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23). The 1H NMR spectra overlay of synthesized 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) and commercially available dihydroartemisinic acid (1) is shown in Figure to confirm the deuterium incorporation at C-3 (boxed δ 1.8–1.9 region).

Scheme 2

Synthesis of 3,3-Dideuterodihydroartemisinic Acid (23) from Alcohol 26

Figure 8

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3 solvent) spectra overlay of synthesized 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) and commercially available dihydroartemisinic acid (1). Boxed at δ 1.8–1.9 is the C-3 proton region.

Use of 3,3-Dideuterodihydroartemisinic Acid (23) to Quantitatively Measure 3,3-Dideuteroartemisinin (24) Formation

In order to measure the formation of 3,3-dideuteroartemisinin (24) from 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23), a dried sample of 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) was left in a vial open to air either in the presence of sunlight (Figure ) or in complete darkness (Figure ) (Table ). Surprisingly, although the amount of d2-artemisinin (24, m/z 285, retention time (tR) ≈ 3.6 min) was significantly more in the light than in the dark, the amount of d0-artemisinin (3, m/z 283, tR ≈ 3.6 min) was formed in equal amounts under both conditions (Table , entries 1 and 3). This formation of d0-artemisinin (3) was not due to the lack of deuterium incorporation in the synthesized starting material (23 by LC-HRMS, see Supporting Information), which is confirmed from the fact that the ratio of d2-artemisinin to d0-artemisinin (24 to 3) is not the same under the light and in the dark conditions (i.e., ∼200:1 with light vs ∼5:1 without light, Table , entry 1 vs entry 3). Instead, the formation of d0-artemisinin (3) is likely due to a different mechanism of endoperoxide formation that involves the loss of the deuterium atoms at C-3.

Figure 9

(A) Vials containing d2-dihydroartemisinic acid (23) were exposed to light. The samples were treated under either condition after 13 days: (B) with internal standard (d0-artemisinin, m/z 283.1540, 3) or (C) without internal standard (d0-artemisinin, m/z 283.1540, 3) and analyzed via LC-HRMS data. Extracted ion chromatogram: d2-artemisinin (24):d1-artemisinin (35):d0-artemisinin (3) (m/z 285.1666, 284.1603, 283.1540). Mass spectrum shown below each chromatogram of peak with retention time (tR) of ∼3.6 min (range of m/z 282.0–287.1). Electrospray ionization (ESI) positive mode, 10 ppm mass tolerance window.

Figure 10

(A) Vials containing d2-dihydroartemisinic acid (23) were kept in darkness, and the samples were treated under the following conditions after 13 days: (B) with internal standard (d0-artemisinin, m/z 283.1540) and (C) without internal standard (d0-artemisinin, m/z 283.1540, 3) and analyzed by LC-HRMS. Extracted ion chromatogram: d2-artemisinin (24):d1-artemisinin (35):d0-artemisinin (3) (m/z 285.1666, 284.1603, 283.1540). Mass spectrum shown below each chromatogram of peak with retention time (tR) of ∼3.6 min (range of m/z 282.0–287.1). Ten ppm mass tolerance window. Electrospray ionization (ESI) positive mode.

Table 1

LC-HRMS Results for 13-Day Time Point (Data from Figures and 10) Summarizeda

entry	light	internal std	285.1666 (m/z)	284.1603 (m/z)	283.1540 (m/z)
1	yes	no	227 610 515	7 367 620	1 860 388
2	yes	yes	323 413 830	11 756 727	23 322 650
3	no	no	4 869 817	N.D.	1 437 710
4	no	yes	7 304 669	252 006	22 008 172

Internal standards: 90 μL of a solution of artemisinin (12.7 μg/mL, 2:1 MeOH to CH2Cl2, v/v) and 10 μL of a solution of dihydroartemisinic acid (5.7 mg/mL in CH2Cl2). Area of peaks corresponding to indicated masses are reported in the table: d2-artemisinin (24) (m/z 285.1666), d1-artemisinin (35) (m/z 284.1603), and d0-artemisinin (3) (m/z 283.1540). N.D.: none detected. Entries 1 and 2: Figure B and C, entries 3 and 4: Figure B and C.

Additionally, monodeuterated artemisinin (Figure , 35) was also detected in the presence of light (Table , entry 1, m/z 284.1603). Notably, the use of a high-resolution mass spectrometer was essential in distinguishing 13C-artemisinin and d1-artemisinin. In other words, the use of an LTQ Orbitrap XL with 100 000 resolving power enabled the resolution of the artemisinin isotopologues with one 13C atom and one deuterium atom ([M + H]+ of m/z 284.1574 and m/z 284.1603), which requires a minimum of 97 986 resolving power (M/ΔM) to distinguish these isotopologues with a 10.2 ppm mass difference.

The fact that the amount of d0-artemisinin (3) was detected at about the same levels both in the light and in the dark (Table , entries 1 and 3, areas of 1 860 388 and 1 437 710, respectively) suggests that the conversion of 3,3-d2-dihydroartemisinic acid to d0-artemisinin (23 to 3) occurs independent of light. Interestingly, because the formation of d0-artemisinin from 3,3-d2-dihydroartemisinic acid (3 from 23) does not depend on light, its detection could be used to determine the relative rates of conversion of 3,3-d2-dihydroartemisinic acid to 3,3-d2-artemisinin (23 to 24) with and without light. When no internal standard was added, the ratios of d2-artemisinin to d0-artemisinin (24 to 3) in the presence and absence of light were 120:1 and 3.4:1 (Figures C and 10C), a ∼40-fold difference between d2-artemisinin and d0-artemisinin. In addition, the use of d0-artemisinin as an internal standard allowed for the quantitation of d2-artemisinin formation both with and without light (cf. Table S1 for calculation of artemisinin formation over time). Using an internal standard, the rates of conversion of 3,3-d2-dihydroartemisinic acid to 3,3-d2-artemisinin (23 to 24) with and without light were determined to be 1400 ng/day and 32 ng/day (Figures B and 10B), also a ∼40-fold difference. The fact that (i) the relative amounts of d2-artemisinin to d0-artemisinin (24 to 3 with light 120 to 1 and without light 3.4 to 1, a 40-fold difference) is the same as (ii) the relative rates of conversion of 23 to 24 with and without light (1400 ng/day and 32 ng/day, also a 40-fold difference) confirms that the formation of d0-artemisinin from d2-dihydroartemisinic acid (3 from 23, both 9 ng/day) is independent of light. These results suggest that the conversion of d2-dihydroartemisinic acid to d0-artemisinin (23 to 3) occurs at the same rate both with and without light. Importantly, there is likely a kinetic isotope effect at C-3, and this minor mechanistic pathway probably occurs at a faster rate when the C-3 deuterium atoms are not present.[21] Furthermore, a parallel set of time course experiments with another set of vials, the solvent of which was removed with a stream of N2 gas and immediately capped, were also analyzed for artemisinin production. Other than the caps, these vials, containing 3,3-d2-dihydroartemisinic acid (23), were treated in the same way as the prior experiments shown in Figures and 10. The LC-HRMS data analysis revealed production of artemisinin in these samples presumably due to trace amounts of oxygen in the vial or oxygen permeating through the threads of the cap and the vial (Supporting Information).

The mechanism of conversion of 3,3-d2-dihydroartemisinic acid to 3,3-d2-artemisinin (23 to 24) is shown in Figure . The retention of the two C-3 deuterium atoms is consistent with the mechanisms shown in Figure . Moreover, there was also detection of 3-d1-artemisinin (Figure C, m/z 284, 35), which could be explained by the tautomerization of the methyl ketone intermediate (Figure , 13 to 14 to 15).

Figure 11

Mechanisms of formation of dideutero-, monodeutero-, and nondeuterated artemisinin isotopologues (24, 35, and 3) from 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23). Pathway (a) is dominated by the conversion promoted by sunlight to form 3,3-dideuteroartemisinin (24). Pathway (b) is the minor pathway that occurs both in the light and in the dark to result in the formation of the loss of the two C-3 deuterium atoms to form nondeuterated artemisinin (3).

The mechanism for the loss of the two C-3 deuterium atoms in the conversion of 3,3-d2-dihydroartemisinic acid to d0-artemisinin (23 to 3) is proposed through an alkyne intermediate (Figure , 42). Alkyne 42 is formed through the elimination of the C-3 deuterium of dihydro-oxepine 41, resulting in the regiospecific loss of the two C-3-deuterium atoms (Figure ). The alkyne intermediate (42) is converted to artemisinin as shown in Figure b (42 to 3). The alkyne intermediate 42 forms the dihydro-oxepine 43 through an endo-dig cyclization. The dihydro-oxepine structure (43) has been isolated and reported in an experiment that involved the spontaneous decomposition of dihydroartemisinic acid hydroperoxide (2) in CDCl3 in an NMR tube.[6] An alternative endo-dig cyclization from the peroxide intermediate 47 is also shown in Figure A to form the endoperoxide 48, which undergoes cyclization to form artemisinin (3). However, this endo-dig cyclization (Figure , 42 to 43 or Figure A, 47 to 48) does not have any literature precedence. Therefore, alternative mechanisms for the loss of the two C-3 deuterium atoms are proposed in Figure B and C. Figure B shows the formation of an alternative allylic hydroperoxide (50) from dihydroartemisinic acid (23), which undergoes C–C bond scission to yield the enolic aldehyde 51. The resulting enol 51 tautomerizes to lose the deuterium, giving the keto aldehyde 54, which in turn is converted into artemisinin (3). In another mechanistic proposal, as shown in Figure C, the monodeuterated dihydro-oxepine 41 (from Figure ) can form the oxocarbocation 57 through protonation, which can re-form the nondeuterated dihydro-oxepine 43 (Figure C). The resulting nondeuterated dihydro-oxepine can undergo endoperoxide formation as shown in Figure (43 to 3).

Figure 12

Alternative pathways (vs Figure b) leading to the formation of nondeuterated artemisinin (3) from (A) alkyne intermediate 42, (B) 3,3-d2-dihydroartemisinic acid 23, and (C) dihydro-oxepine 41.

In conclusion, a dried sample of 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) that was open to air spontaneously converted to 3,3-dideuteroartemisinin (24) with and without sunlight at rates of 1400 and 32 ng/day, respectively (∼44-fold difference in rate). The formation of artemisinin from dihydroartemisinic acid was detected through 1H NMR spectroscopy to roughly determine the rate of formation of artemisinin from dihydroartemisinic acid (Figure ). In developing this new technique to quantify the rate of artemisinin formation from dihydroartemisinic acid, a new synthesis of 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) was developed (Scheme ). Furthermore, a method using the synthesized 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid isotopologue (23) and an internal standard of artemisinin (3) enabled the quantification of artemisinin production through LC-HRMS (Figure ). Unexpectedly, nondeuterated artemisinin (3) was also formed from the 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) starting material both with and without light (Figures and 10), suggesting that a minor mechanistic pathway is operative to form the endoperoxide ring of artemisinin, which involves the loss of the two C-3 deuterium atoms. This minor pathway likely occurs at a faster rate when there are no C-3 deuterium atoms present in dihydroartemisinic acid due to a kinetic isotope effect (i.e., stronger C–D bond vs weaker C–H bond). In the presence of sunlight, the formation of the endoperoxide from 3,3-dideuterodihydroartemisinic acid (23) retains the two C-3 deuterium atoms to yield 3,3-d2-artemisinin (24) (Figure ). Although an enzymatic conversion of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin is not ruled out, the mechanisms proposed for this nonenzymatic transformation of dihydroartemisinic acid to artemisinin may reflect how the endoperoxide of artemisinin is formed in nature.

Experimental Section

General Experimental Procedures

Melting points were recorded on a melting point apparatus (Global Medical and Lab Solutions, India, or Optimelt MPA100/Stanford Research Systems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Optical rotations were recorded on an Autopol IV polarimeter (Rudolph Research, Hackettstown, NJ, USA). IR data were acquired on an FTIR system (Nicolet iS50 FT-IR spectrometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). IR data were analyzed on OMNIC software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). NMR data were analyzed on Topspin software (Bruker). HRMS data were acquired on an LTQ Orbitrap XL instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) connected to a Waters Acquity UPLC system (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA). MS data were analyzed on Qualbrowser software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The UPLC column used was a Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA), Synergi 4 μm, Fusion-RP (reverse-phase) 80 Å. TLC plates with 254 nm fluorescent indicator were used.

LC-MS Conditions

Samples were run on an Acuity UPLC connected to an LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer. The liquid chromatography conditions were set as follows: mobile phase A was 0.01% formic acid in water, v/v, and mobile phase B was 0.01% formic acid in MeCN, v/v. The flow rate was 0.6 mL/min. The gradient was as follows (over 10 min): from 0 to 1 min, 98% mobile phase A; 1 to 3 min, the gradient shifted from 98% A to 50% A; 3 to 6 min, 50% A to 2% A; from 6 to 7.9 min held at 2% A; 7.9 to 8 min, from 2% A to 98% A; 8 to 10 min, 98% A. The mass spectrometer was tuned with a solution of 1 mM artemisinin in MeOH. The tuning conditions were as follows: sheath gas flow rate 35, aux gas flow rate 8, sweep gas flow rate 0, spray voltage (kV) 5.00, capillary temperature 250 °C, capillary voltage 14 V, tube lens 125 V. Before mass spectrometry samples were run on the instrument, the mass spectrometer was calibrated using a Pierce LTQ ESI positive calibration ion solution (Thermo Fisher, catalog number: 88322); see Supporting Information for calibration results. Each injection was 10 μL of volume for data shown in Figures and 10. Samples were analyzed under electrospray ionization positive mode (ESI-positive mode).

Time Course of Dihydroartemisinic Acid to Artemisinin (1 to 3) Monitored by 1H NMR Spectroscopy

A solution of dihydroartemisinic acid (1) in CH2Cl2 (1.0 g in 50 mL) was divided into 40 clear glass vials and 40 amber glass vials at 0.5 mL per vial. After drying the solution first with a stream of N2 and then under house vacuum in a desiccator, the clear glass vials were let to stand by the window sill open to air while the amber glass vials were placed in a black box in a cabinet in total darkness. Various time points were taken by dissolving the dried samples in CDCl3 (0.7 mL) to monitor the formation of artemisinin (3).

Time Course of 3,3-d2-Dihydroartemisinic Acid (23) to Artemisinin (3, 24, and 35) Monitored by HRMS

A solution of 3,3-d2-dihydroartemisinic acid (23) (2.7 mg) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) was aliquoted into 20 2 mL clear glass vials and 20 2 mL amber glass vials with the addition of 50 μL for each vial. The solvent was evaporated under house vacuum in a desiccator. The clear glass vials containing 23 were placed in a clear plastic vial rack on the window sill. The amber glass vials with 23 were placed in a black plastic box, which was stored in a cabinet. At different time points, the compounds were extracted through two different methods: [i] with internal standards (e.g., Figure B) and [ii] without internal standards (e.g., Figure C). The solvents in four vials in each set were blown down with a stream of N2 and quickly sealed with a cap (Supporting Information for LC-MS traces).

With internal standards: 90 μL of solution B and 10 μL of solution D were added. Solution B was 12.7 μg of artemisinin in 1 mL of a MeOH–CH2Cl2 (2:1, v/v) mixture, and solution D was 5.65 mg of dihydroartemisinic acid in 1 mL of CH2Cl2.

Without internal standards: 100 μL of MeOH was added. When analyzing for d0-artemisinin (3), d1-artemisinin (35), and d2-artemisinin (24), the following masses were searched for through extracted ion chromatography: m/z 283.1540, 284.1603, and 285.1666 with a 10 ppm mass tolerance window. The mass for 13C-labeled artemisinin was m/z 284.1574.

Synthesis of 2R-(1R,4R,4aS,8aS)-4,7-Dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydronaphthalen-1-yl)propan-1-ol (26)

Dihydroartemisinic acid (1, 30.0 g, 127 mmol) in Et2O (150 mL) was added to a suspension of LiAlH4 (19.3 g, 508 mmol, 4 molar equiv) in Et2O (100 mL) at −78 °C under an atmosphere of N2. The reaction was stirred for 30 min, warmed to room temperature, and left stirring for 3 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was cooled to −78 °C, and acetone (100 mL) was added dropwise, followed by Rochelle’s salt (30 g, 110 mmol) in water (100 mL) (added dropwise) by an addition funnel at −78 °C. The reaction mixture was filtered using a fritted filter funnel to afford dihydroartemisinic alcohol (26) as a white solid (28.2 g, 128 mmol, 94%). No further purification was done; Rf 0.56 (hexanes–EtOAc, 4:1, v/v); [α]20D +10.2 [c 5.6 mg/mL in CHCl3]; IR (neat) 3401.44, 3328.95, 2962.73, 2919.27, 2864.28, 2842.95 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.21 (s, 1 H), 3.74 (dd, J1 = 14 Hz, J2 = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 3.52 (dd, J1 = 16.8 Hz, J1 = 4.3 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (s, 2H), 1.65–1.50 (m, 6H), 1.63 (br s, 3H), 0.99 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 135.1, 120.6, 66.73, 42.62, 42.01, 41.73, 37.44, 36.58, 36.36, 35.59, 27.62, 26.62, 26.29, 25.77, 23.77, 19.73, 14.92; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C15H27O [M + H]+, 223.2056; found, 223.2039 (Δ 7.62 ppm); mp 72.3–72.8 °C.

Synthesis of (R)-2-((1R,4R,4aS,8aS)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-Octahydro-4,7-dimethylnaphthalen-1-yl)propyl tert-Butyldimethylsilyl Ether (27)

Imidazole (5.0 g, 73.4 mmol, 4.7 molar equiv) and TBDMSCl (3.1 g, 20.6 mmol, 1.3 molar equiv) were added to a solution of alcohol 26 (3.5 g, 15.8 mmol) in MeCN (200 mL). After the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h, EtOAc (500 mL) was added, and the reaction mixture was diluted with water (200 mL). The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford TBDMS ether 27 as a clear oil (3.7 g, 11 mmol, 70%): R 0.61 (100% hexanes); [α]20D −30.0 [c 1.0 mg/mL in CHCl3]; IR (neat) 2953.45, 2925.01, 2905.90, 2854.10, 1707.34 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.22 (br s, 1 H), 3.68 (dd, J1 = 9.7 Hz, J2 = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.41 (dd, J1 = 9.7 Hz, J2 = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.49–2.43 (m, 1H), 1.96–1.85 (m, 2H), 1.84–1.75 (m, 1H), 1.65–1.51 (m, 4H), 1.63 (br s, 3H), 1.47–1.37 (m, 1H), 1.22–1.13 (m, 2H), 0.94 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (s, 3H), 0.90 (s, 9H), 0.86 (d, 6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.03 (br s, 6H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 135.0, 121.3, 67.0, 42.9, 42.3, 37.7, 36.9, 35.9, 27.9, 26.9, 26.6, 25.8, 24.0, 20.0, 18.5, 15.4, −3.43, −5.26. HRMS run on ESI positive mode, but ion not found due to small molecule not ionizing.

Synthesis of (R)-2-((1R,4R,4aS,6R,8aS)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-Octahydro-6-hydroxy-4,7-dimethylnaphthalen-1-yl)propan-1-ol (28)

SeO2 (0.31 g, 2.8 mmol, 1 molar equiv) was added to a solution of TBDMS ether 27 (0.93 g, 2.8 mmol) in a mixture of EtOH and water (30 mL, 9:1, v/v). The reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 6 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (200 mL) and washed with water (2 × 50 mL). The organic layer was concentrated by reduced pressure and purified by column chromatography (silica gel, 100% hexanes to 10% hexanes in EtOAc, v/v) to yield diol 28 as a solid (0.20 g, 0.84 mmol, 30%). The solid was dissolved in EtOAc and hexanes (3 mL, 1:1 EtOAc and hexanes, v/v) and left in the hood for 2 days to afford block-shaped crystals. R 0.42 (hexanes–EtOAc, 1:1, v/v); [α]20D +7.0 [c 3.4 mg/mL in CHCl3]; IR (neat) 3373.02, 3315.64, 2924.65, 2865.61, 1705.31, 1661.08 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.35 (br s, 1H), 4.14–4.07 (m, 1H), 3.74 (dd, J1 = 10 Hz, J2 = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 3.53 (dd, J1 = 10.4 Hz, J2 = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.59–2.54 (m, 1H), 2.40 (ddd, J1 = 12 Hz, J2 = 5.7 Hz, 1H, J3 = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.76 (br s, 3H), 1.75–1.55 (m, 4H), 1.51–1.34 (m, 4H), 1.25–1.16 (m, 2H), 1.00 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 0.91 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 136.9, 124.6, 68.9, 66.8, 44.9, 42.6, 38.2, 37.06, 36.95, 35.7, 29.0, 26.6, 19.9, 19.8, 15.1; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C15H27O2 [M + H]+, 239.2006; found, 239.1987 (Δ 7.94); mp 107.2–107.5 °C.

Synthesis of (R)-2-((1R,4R,4aS,8aS)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-Octahydro-4,7-dimethylnaphthalen-1-yl)propyl Acetate (29)

Ac2O (14 mL, 150 mmol, 2.0 molar equiv) was added to a solution of alcohol 26 (16.0 g, 72.3 mmol, 1 molar equiv) in pyridine (100 mL, 0.7 M). The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min, and the resulting solution diluted with water and extracted with Et2O (3 × 100 mL). The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure, and the resulting oil was filtered through a short pad of silica gel with 200 mL of 50/50 EtOAc–hexanes, v/v, to afford acetate 29 as a colorless oil (11.5 g, 43.5 mmol, 60%): R 0.76 (hexanes–EtOAc, 4:1, v/v); [α]20D −72.2 [c 2.3 mg/mL in CHCl3]; IR (neat) 2959.61, 2908.35, 2867.57, 2851.13, 1738.20 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.18 (s, 1H), 4.19 (dd, J1 = 11 Hz, J2 = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (dd, J1 = 11 Hz, J2 = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 22.48 (s, 1H), 2.05 (s, 3H), 1.95 (m, 1H), 1.94–1.91 (m, 2H), 1.83- 1.77 (m, 2H), 1.63 (br s, 3H), 1.59–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.50–1.35 (m, 1H), 1.26–1.17 (m, 3H), 1.07–0.98 (m, 1 H), 0.97 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 0.86 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.5, 135.5, 120.5, 68.70, 43.32, 42.15, 37.55, 35.70, 33.97, 27.78, 26.79, 26.44, 25.94, 23.94, 21.12, 19.89, 15.46; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C17H29O2 [M + H]+, 265.2162; found, 265.2138 (Δ 9.05 ppm).

Synthesis of (R)-2-((1R,4R,4aS,6R,8aS)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-Octahydro-6-hydroxy-4,7-dimethylnaphthalen-1-yl)propyl Acetate (30)

SeO2 (12.65 g, 114.0 mmol, 1 molar equiv) was added to a solution of EtOH (200 mL), water (20 mL), and acetate 29 (30.0 g, 114.0 mmol, 1 molar equiv). The reaction mixture was refluxed at 90 °C for 10 h, cooled to rt, and diluted with EtOAc (200 mL). The resulting solution was washed with water (200 mL), and the organic layer was concentrated by reduced pressure. The crude material was purified by silica gel column chromatography (90% hexanes in EtOAc, v/v, to 10% hexanes in ethyl acetate, v/v) to afford allylic alcohol 30 as a yellow oil (22.85 g, 81.5 mmol, 76%): R 0.38 (hexanes–EtOAc, 4:1, v/v); [α]20D +31.1 [c 5.1 mg/mL in CHCl3]; IR (neat) 3390.21, 2910.02, 2867.15, 2850.37, 1736.83, 1722.03 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.33 (s, 1H), 4.18 (dd, J1 = 11 Hz, J2 = 3.4 Hz, 1H), 4.13–4.07 (m, 1H), 3.90 (dd, J1 = 11 Hz, J2 = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2. 57 (s, 1H), 2.06 (s, 3H), 1.80–1.75 (m, 1H), 1.76 (br s, 3H), 1.56 (s, 1H), 1.50–1.45 (m, 1H), 1.38 (s, 2H), 1.20–1.14 (m, 2H), 1.02- 0.97 (m, 2H), 0.97 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.5, 137.1, 124.3, 68.83, 68.51, 44.82, 43.15, 38.04, 36.99, 35.60, 34.16, 28.93, 26.49, 21.14, 19.83, 19.77, 15.45; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C17H29O3 [M + H]+, 281.2111; found, 281.2085 (Δ 9.25 ppm).

Synthesis of (R)-2-((1R,4R,4aS,8aS)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-Octahydro-6-keto-4,7-dimethylnaphthalen-1-yl)propyl Acetate (31)

Dess–Martin periodinane (19.45 g, 45.9 mmol, 1 molar equiv) was added to a solution of allylic alcohol 30 (12.85 g, 45.9 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (250 mL). The resulting solution was diluted with CH2Cl2 (100 mL) and washed with saturated Na2S2O4 (aqueous, 100 mL). The organic layer was washed with saturated NaHCO3 (aqueous, 100 mL). The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and purified by silica gel chromatography (90% CH2Cl2 to 10% EtOAc). The crude residue was washed with water and NaHCO3 and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain enone 31 as a yellow solid (9.4 g, 33.8 mmol, 73%): R 0.51 (hexanes–EtOAc, 4:1, v/v); [α]20D +92.5 [c 5.4 mg/mL in CHCl3]; IR (neat) 2955.34, 2941.67, 2920.93, 2905.21, 2878.09, 2851.31, 1731.93, 1666.76 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.49 (s, 1H), 4.22 (dd, J1 = 11 Hz, J2 = 3.4 Hz, 1H), 3.95 (dd, J1 = 11 Hz, J2 = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.91 (br s, 1H), 2.75 (dd, J1 = 17 Hz, J2 = 2.6 Hz,, 1H), 2.44 (dd, J1 = 17 Hz, J2 = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 1.85–1.82 (m, 1H), 1.77 (br s, 3H), 1.49– 1.44 (m, 1H), 1.36–1.30 (m, 1H), 1.05 (m, 3H), 1.01 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 0.97–0.92 (m, 1H), 0.85 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 199.9, 171.4, 144.1, 136.9, 68.08, 46.14, 43.08, 39.31, 35.33, 34.24, 28.79, 26.96, 21.11, 19.65, 16.21, 15.55; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C17H27O3 [M + H]+, 279.1955; found, 279.1929 (Δ 9.31 ppm); mp 98.0–99.4 °C.

*To remove an aldehyde impurity (see Supporting Information), which coeluted with the enone product (9) derived from the formation of the primary allylic alcohol in the SeO2 oxidation, the purified enone was subjected to Pinnick oxidation conditions to convert the aldehyde impurities to corresponding carboxylic acids, which would be removed upon basic aqueous workup: A solution of NaH2PO4 (4.15 g, 34.61 mmol, 0.83 molar equiv) in water (25 mL) and NaOCl (3.77 g, 20.9 mmol, 0.5 molar equiv) were added to a solution of enone 31 (9.69 g, 41.7 mmol) in t-BuOH (4.38 mL) and 2-methyl-2-butene (5.43 mL). The mixture was washed with NaHCO3 (saturated aqueous solution, 100 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL). The organic layer was concentrated by reduced pressure. The crude material was purified by silica gel column chromatography (90% hexanes in EtOAc, v/v, to 10% hexanes in EtOAc, v/v) to yield pure enone 31 (7.1 g, 30.6 mmol, 73%) as a white solid (see Supporting Information for structures).

Synthesis of (R)-2-((1R,4R,4aS,8aS)-6,6-Dideutero-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydro-4,7-dimethylnaphthalen-1-yl)propan-1-ol (33)

LiAlD4 (0.68 g, 16.19 mmol, 4.5 molar equiv) was added to a solution of AlCl3 (8.63 g, 64.7 mmol, 18 molar equiv) in Et2O (100 mL) at −78 °C. The reaction flask was evacuated and backfilled with N2. After 5 min, enone 31 (1.00 g, 3.59 mmol, 1.5 molar equiv) dissolved in Et2O (100 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was gradually warmed to room temperature and stirred for an additional 10 h. The mixture was cooled to −78 °C and quenched with water (100 mL). The resulting solution was diluted with EtOAc (200 mL). The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude material was purified by silica gel column chromatography (100% hexanes to 10% EtOAc in hexanes, v/v, to 20% EtOAc in hexanes, v/v) to afford a mixture of alcohol (33) and diene 32 as a white solid. Diene 32 was slightly more polar than monoalkene 33 (i.e., when the compounds eluted off of the column, the mixture was collected in 10 test tubes (20 mL volume each tube), and the solvent in each tube was evaporated; the resulting compound was characterized by 1H NMR spectroscopy). The mixture of 33 (59 mg, 0.26 mmol, 7%) and 32 (98 mg, 0.44 mmol, 12%) was further separated through a second column. *All compound characterization is for monoalkene (33): R 0.49 (hexanes–EtOAc, 4:1, v/v); [α]20D −54.6 [c 1.7 mg/mL in CHCl3]; IR (neat) 3398.21, 3328.32, 2962.93, 2919.63, 2863.37, 2842.91, 2160.84, 2127.28, 2082.21, 2023.07, 1716.14, 1661.06, 1558.32 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.21 (s, 1H), 3.74 (dd, J1 = 11 Hz, J2 = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.52 (m, 1H), 2.47 (s, 1H), 1.91 (dd, J1 = 14 Hz, J2 = 3.6 Hz,, 1H), 1.62 (br s, 3H), 1.56–1.49 (m, 1H), 1.48–1.36 (m, 1H), 1.25–1.18 (m, 3H), 0.99 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.97- 0.89 (m, 2H), 0.86 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 135.3, 120.9, 66.97, 42.84, 42.23, 37.68, 36.81, 35.82, 27.85, 26.51, 25.80, 23.97, 19.96, 15.14, 1.16; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C15H25D2O [M + H]+, 225.2182; found, 225.2160 (Δ9.77 ppm); mp 64.5–65.5 °C. *This reaction is water sensitive, and oven-dried glassware, dried under N2 atmosphere, were used. Although the diene 32 was visible on the TLC plate under a UV lamp, the R values of the monoalkene 33 and diene 32 were identical by TLC. When the reaction conditions were not dry (i.e., water condensed during the reaction), the reaction mixture turned pink in color, and the major product was diene 32.

Synthesis of (R)-2-((1R,4R,4aS,8aS)-6,6-Dideutero-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydro-4,7-dimethylnaphthalen-1-yl)propan-1-al (34)

Dess–Martin periodinane (52.0 mg, 0.12 mmol, 1.1 molar equiv) was added to a solution of alcohol 33 (24.0 mg, 0.11 mmol, 1 molar equiv) in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h, directly loaded on a column packed with a slurry of silica gel in hexanes, and purified by column chromatography (100% hexanes to 50% EtOAc in hexanes, v/v) to afford aldehyde 33 as a white solid (12 mg, 0.05 mmol, 49%): R 0.58 (hexanes–EtOAc, 4:1, v/v); [α]20D +221.1 [c 2.0 mg/mL in CHCl3]; IR (neat) 3393.83, 2922.14, 2868.88, 1704.93 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.58 (d, J = 4.02, 1H), 5.12 (s, 1H), 2.48 (s, 1H), 2.39 (m, 1 H), 1.94 (dd, J1 = 13 Hz, J2 = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.64 (br s, 3H), 1.54 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, 2H), 1.48–1.39 (m, 3H), 1.29–1.25 (m, 2H), 1.15–1.09 (m, 2H), 1.07 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 4H), 1.02–0.91 (m, 2H), 0.88 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 4H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 206.2, 134.5, 119.8, 48.59, 41.99, 41.63, 36.75, 35.41, 27.86, 27.49, 25.70, 23.94, 19.84, 11.90; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C15H23D2O [M + H]+, 223.2025; found, 223.2004 (Δ9.40 ppm); mp 124.5–127.3 °C.

Synthesis of (R)-2-((1R,4R,4aS,8aS)-6,6-Dideutero-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydro-4,7-dimethylnaphthalen-1-yl)propan-1-oic acid (23)

A solution of NaH2PO4 (65.9 mg, 0.55 mmol, 10 molar equiv) in water (2 mL) and NaOCl (29.8 mg, 0.33 mmol, 6 molar equiv) were added to a solution of aldehyde 33 (12.7 mg, 0.06 mmol, 1 molar equiv) in t-BuOH (5.71 mL) and 2-methyl-2-butene (0.54 mL). The reaction mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL), and the organic layer concentrated under reduced pressure to afford carboxylic acid 23 as a white solid (9.0 mg, 0.04 mmol, 71%). No further purification was done. Rf 0.85 (hexanes–EtOAc, 4:1, v/v); [α]20D −15.0 [c 1.1 mg/mL in CHCl3]; IR (neat) 2961.19, 2920.51, 2867.51, 2851.48, 1704.76 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.12 (s, 1H), 3.36 (s, 1H), 1.93 (dd, J1 = 14 Hz, J2= 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.67–1.58 (m, 2H), 1.66 (br s, 3H), 1.54 (dd, J1 = 14 Hz, J2= 2.0 Hz, 1H), 1.48–1.38 (m, 2H), 1.29–1.23 (m, 2H), 1.19 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.12 (qd, J1 = 13 Hz, J2= 3.3 Hz, 1H), 0.97 (qd, J1 = 13 Hz, J2= 3.3 Hz, 1H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 181.0, 136.1, 119.5, 43.81, 41.96, 41.86, 36.51, 35.39, 29.85, 27.83, 27.58, 25.72, 23.95, 19.85, 15.27; HRMS (m/z) calculated for C15H23D2O2 [M + H]+, 239.1975; found, 239.1971 (Δ1.7 ppm); mp 110–120 °C. 2H NMR spectroscopy was performed by dissolving compound 23 (12 mg) in 1 mL of a solution of CDCl3–CHCl3 (0.5 to 4.5 mL) and two broad peaks were observed corresponding to the two deuteriums incorporated at C-3 with the following chemical shifts: δ 1.89 and 1.79.

X-ray Crystallography of Compound 28

Single crystals of compound 28 were prepared by slow evaporation of 2 mL of a solution of 28 in 1:1 EtOAc–hexanes, v/v, which was left to stand overnight. Suitable colorless plate-like crystals for compound 28 with dimensions of 0.30 mm × 0.24 mm × 0.17 mm were mounted in Paratone oil onto a nylon loop. All data were collected at 98(2) K, using a Rigaku AFC12/Saturn 724 CCD fitted with Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.710 75 Å). Data collection and unit cell refinement were performed using CrysAlisPro software.[22] The total number of data were measured in the range 5.57° < 2θ < 55.0°, using ω scans. Data processing and absorption correction, giving minimum and maximum transmission factors (0.9635, 1.000), were accomplished with CrysAlisPro[23] and SCALE3 ABSPACK,[23] respectively. The structure, using Olex2,[24] was solved with the ShelXT[25] structure solution program using direct methods and refined (on F2) with the ShelXL[26] refinement package using full-matrix, least-squares techniques. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. All carbon-bound H atom positions were determined by geometry and refined by a riding model. The oxygen-bound H atom position was determined by electron density plot.

X-ray Crystallography of Compound 32

Single crystals of C15H24O (compound 32, diene) was prepared by slow evaporation of 2 mL of a solution of 32 in 1:1 MeOH–acetone, v/v, which was left to stand overnight. Suitable colorless plate-like crystals for compound (32) with dimensions of 0.33 mm × 0.30 mm × 0.13 mm were mounted in Paratone oil onto a nylon loop. All data were collected at 100(2) K, using a Rigaku AFC12/Saturn 724 CCD fitted with Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.710 75 Å). Data collection and unit cell refinement were performed using CrysAlisPro software.[22] The total number of data were measured in the range 4.46° < 2θ < 52.0°, using ω scans. Data processing and absorption correction, giving minimum and maximum transmission factors (0.9733, 1.000), were accomplished with CrysAlisPro[23] and SCALE3 ABSPACK,[23] respectively. The structure, using Olex2,[24] was solved with the ShelXT[25] structure solution program using direct methods and refined (on F2) with the ShelXL[26] refinement package using full-matrix, least-squares techniques. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. All carbon-bound H atom positions were determined by geometry and refined by a riding model. The oxygen-bound H atom position was determined by electron density plot.