M Azuma1, Z A Khant2, M Kitajima3, H Uetani3, T Watanabe4, K Yokogami4, H Takeshima4, T Hirai2. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (M.A., Z.A.K., T.H.) and minako_azuma@med.miyazaki-u.ac.jp. 2. From the Departments of Radiology (M.A., Z.A.K., T.H.) and. 3. Neurosurgery (T.W., K.Y., H.T.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan. 4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology (M.K., H.U.), Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because it can be difficult to discriminate between a Rathke cleft cyst and cystic craniopharyngioma by conventional MR imaging alone, we investigated whether contrast-enhanced 3D T2-FLAIR MR imaging at 3T helps to distinguish a Rathke cleft cyst from a cystic craniopharyngioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted and 3D T2-FLAIR images of 17 patients with pathologically confirmed Rathke cleft cyst (n = 10) or cystic craniopharyngioma (n = 7). All underwent 3T MR imaging studies before surgery. Two neuroradiologists independently recorded the enhancement grade of the lesion wall as grade 2 (most of the wall enhanced), grade 1 (some of the wall enhanced), and grade 0 (none of the wall enhanced). One neuroradiologist performed a blinded reading study of conventional MR images with/without 3D T2-FLAIR images. Interobserver agreement was determined by calculating the κ coefficient. Statistical analyses, including receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement for postcontrast T1WI and 3D T2-FLAIR images was excellent (κ = 0.824 and κ = 0.867, respectively). Although the difference in the mean enhancement grade of Rathke cleft cysts and cystic craniopharyngiomas was not significant on postcontrast T1WIs, it was significant on postcontrast 3D T2-FLAIR images (P = .0011). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the conventional MR alone and conventional MR with 3D T2-FLAIR readings was 0.879 and 1.0, respectively, though there was no significant difference in the area under the curve between the 2 readings. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced 3D T2-FLAIR imaging at 3T helps to distinguish a Rathke cleft cyst from cystic craniopharyngioma.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because it can be difficult to discriminate between a Rathke cleft cyst and cystic craniopharyngioma by conventional MR imaging alone, we investigated whether contrast-enhanced 3D T2-FLAIR MR imaging at 3T helps to distinguish a Rathke cleft cyst from a cystic craniopharyngioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted and 3D T2-FLAIR images of 17 patients with pathologically confirmed Rathke cleft cyst (n = 10) or cystic craniopharyngioma (n = 7). All underwent 3T MR imaging studies before surgery. Two neuroradiologists independently recorded the enhancement grade of the lesion wall as grade 2 (most of the wall enhanced), grade 1 (some of the wall enhanced), and grade 0 (none of the wall enhanced). One neuroradiologist performed a blinded reading study of conventional MR images with/without 3D T2-FLAIR images. Interobserver agreement was determined by calculating the κ coefficient. Statistical analyses, including receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement for postcontrast T1WI and 3D T2-FLAIR images was excellent (κ = 0.824 and κ = 0.867, respectively). Although the difference in the mean enhancement grade of Rathke cleft cysts and cystic craniopharyngiomas was not significant on postcontrast T1WIs, it was significant on postcontrast 3D T2-FLAIR images (P = .0011). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the conventional MR alone and conventional MR with 3D T2-FLAIR readings was 0.879 and 1.0, respectively, though there was no significant difference in the area under the curve between the 2 readings. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced 3D T2-FLAIR imaging at 3T helps to distinguish a Rathke cleft cyst from cystic craniopharyngioma.
Authors: Bernd M Hofmann; Jürgen Kreutzer; Wolfgang Saeger; Michael Buchfelder; Ingmar Blümcke; Rudolf Fahlbusch; Rolf Buslei Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: H Fukuoka; T Hirai; T Okuda; Y Shigematsu; A Sasao; E Kimura; T Hirano; S Yano; R Murakami; Y Yamashita Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 3.825