Literature DB >> 18648253

Three-dimensional fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging with isotropic resolution and nonselective adiabatic inversion provides improved three-dimensional visualization and cerebrospinal fluid suppression compared to two-dimensional flair at 3 tesla.

Gulzar Hameed Chagla1, Reed F Busse, Ryan Sydnor, Howard A Rowley, Patrick A Turski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this investigation, we compare two-dimensional (2D) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging of the brain to an isotropic three-dimensional (3D) FLAIR technique that uses a modulated refocusing flip angle echo train and parallel imaging with 2D acceleration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-dimensional and 3D FLAIR sequences were obtained in 16 patients. All examinations were performed on a 3 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance (MR) system. Flow artifacts within the subarachnoid space and ventricles were scored using a 4-point scale. For 2D and 3D FLAIR, the signal-to-noise ratios and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated.
RESULTS: Compared to 2D FLAIR, the 3D FLAIR images were less degraded by flow artifacts in the subarachnoid space and ventricle (P < 0.03) based on the qualitative imaging scores. Signal-to-noise ratios and contrast-to-noise ratios were higher for 3D FLAIR (P < 0.02) for all variables when compared with 2D FLAIR sequence.
CONCLUSIONS: The acquisition time for whole brain isotropic fast spin echo 3D FLAIR can be dramatically reduced by using an extended echo train with flip angle modulation and parallel imaging. The adiabatic, nonselective inversion pulse encompasses the entire volume and provides uniform suppression of the cerebrospinal fluid signal eliminating cerebrospinal fluid pulsation artifacts. Other advantages include reformatting in any desired plane, volume measurements, displays of surface anatomy, and coregistration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18648253      PMCID: PMC2730484          DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181814d28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  21 in total

1.  Intraventricular CSF pulsation artifact on fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR images: analysis of 100 consecutive normal studies.

Authors:  R Bakshi; S D Caruthers; V Janardhan; M Wasay
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Arteriovenous malformations: assessment of gliotic and ischemic changes with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MRI.

Authors:  M Essig; F Wenz; S O Schoenberg; J Debus; M V Knopp; G Van Kaick
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Image-guided therapy: infrastructure for practical applications.

Authors:  J W Haller; T C Ryken; M W Vannier
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Suppression of cerebrospinal fluid and blood flow artifacts in FLAIR MR imaging with a single-slab three-dimensional pulse sequence: initial experience.

Authors:  D F Kallmes; F K Hui; J P Mugler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Superiority of 3D wavelet-packet denoising in MR microscopy.

Authors:  Nilesh R Ghugre; Melanie Martin; Miriam Scadeng; Seth Ruffins; Timothy Hiltner; Robia Pautler; Christopher Waters; Carol Readhead; Russell Jacobs; John C Wood
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T.

Authors:  Shinji Naganawa; Tokiko Koshikawa; Tatsuya Nakamura; Hisashi Kawai; Hiroshi Fukatsu; Takeo Ishigaki; Tomomi Komada; Katsuya Maruyama; Osamu Takizawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Initial clinical experience in MR imaging of the brain with a fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery pulse sequence.

Authors:  J N Rydberg; C A Hammond; R C Grimm; B J Erickson; C R Jack; J Huston; S J Riederer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Comparison of one-, two-, and three-dimensional measurements of childhood brain tumors.

Authors:  K E Warren; N Patronas; A A Aikin; P S Albert; F M Balis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-09-19       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Isotropic 3D fast FLAIR imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis patients: initial experience.

Authors:  I L Tan; P J W Pouwels; R A van Schijndel; H J Adèr; R A Manoliu; F Barkhof
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Isotropic MRI of the knee with 3D fast spin-echo extended echo-train acquisition (XETA): initial experience.

Authors:  Garry E Gold; Reed F Busse; Carol Beehler; Eric Han; Anja C S Brau; Philip J Beatty; Christopher F Beaulieu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  22 in total

1.  MR diagnosis of facial neuritis: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced 3D-FLAIR technique compared with contrast-enhanced 3D-T1-fast-field echo with fat suppression.

Authors:  H K Lim; J H Lee; D Hyun; J W Park; J L Kim; H y Lee; S Park; J H Ahn; J H Baek; C G Choi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Multi-parametric neuroimaging reproducibility: a 3-T resource study.

Authors:  Bennett A Landman; Alan J Huang; Aliya Gifford; Deepti S Vikram; Issel Anne L Lim; Jonathan A D Farrell; John A Bogovic; Jun Hua; Min Chen; Samson Jarso; Seth A Smith; Suresh Joel; Susumu Mori; James J Pekar; Peter B Barker; Jerry L Prince; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Signal intensity change of the labyrinth in patients with surgically confirmed or radiologically diagnosed vestibular schwannoma on isotropic 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging at 3 T.

Authors:  In Ho Lee; Hyung-Jin Kim; Won Ho Chung; Eunhee Kim; Jung Won Moon; Sung Tae Kim; Keon Ha Kim; Pyoung Jeon; Hong Sik Byun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Brachial plexus assessment with three-dimensional isotropic resolution fast spin echo MRI: comparison with conventional MRI at 3.0 T.

Authors:  A Tagliafico; G Succio; C E Neumaier; G Baio; G Serafini; M Ghidara; M Calabrese; C Martinoli
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging: reduced CSF artifacts and enhanced sensitivity and specificity for subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  N Lummel; V Schoepf; M Burke; H Brueckmann; J Linn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Circumventricular organs of human brain visualized on post-contrast 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging.

Authors:  Minako Azuma; Toshinori Hirai; Yoshihito Kadota; Zaw Aung Khant; Yohei Hattori; Mika Kitajima; Hiroyuki Uetani; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced 3D-FLAIR MR Imaging for Differentiating Rathke Cleft Cyst from Cystic Craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  M Azuma; Z A Khant; M Kitajima; H Uetani; T Watanabe; K Yokogami; H Takeshima; T Hirai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Comparison of post-contrast 3D-T1-MPRAGE, 3D-T1-SPACE and 3D-T2-FLAIR MR images in evaluation of meningeal abnormalities at 3-T MRI.

Authors:  Balaji Jeevanandham; Tejas Kalyanpur; Prashant Gupta; Mathew Cherian
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities are not visible using 3D CUBE FLAIR sequence.

Authors:  Jérôme Hodel; Xavier Leclerc; Mathieu Rodallec; Sophie Gerber; Raphael Blanc; Olivier Outteryck; Samir Benadjaoud; Cécile Rabrait; Mathieu Zuber; Jean-Pierre Pruvo; Marc Zins
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Clinical significance of an increased cochlear 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery signal intensity on an MR imaging examination in patients with acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  D Y Kim; J H Lee; M J Goh; Y S Sung; Y J Choi; R G Yoon; S H Cho; J H Ahn; H J Park; J H Baek
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.