Literature DB >> 36157391

Comparison of The Effect of High- and Low-Frequency Vibration Foam Rolling on The Quadriceps Muscle.

Masatoshi Nakamura1, Kazuki Kasahara2, Riku Yoshida2, Yuta Murakami2, Ryoma Koizumi3, Shigeru Sato2, Kosuke Takeuchi4, Satoru Nishishita5,6, Xin Ye7, Andreas Konrad8.   

Abstract

Vibration foam rolling (VFR) intervention has recently gained attention in sports and rehabilitation settings since the superimposed vibration with foam rolling can affect several physiological systems. However, the sustained effect and a comparison of the effects of different VFR vibration frequencies on flexibility and muscle strength have not been examined. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the acute and sustained effects of three 60-s sets of VFR with different frequencies on knee flexion range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength of the knee extensors. Using a crossover, random allocation design, 16 male university students (21.2 ± 0.6 years) performed under two conditions: VFR with low (35 Hz) and high (67 Hz) frequencies. The acute and sustained effects (20 min after intervention) of VFR on knee flexion ROM, maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVC-ISO) torque, maximum voluntary concentric contraction (MVC-CON) torque, rate of force development (RFD), and single-leg countermovement jump (CMJ) height were examined. Our results showed that knee flexion ROM increased significantly (p < 0.01) immediately after the VFR intervention and remained elevated up to 20 min, regardless of the vibration frequency. MVC-ISO and MVC-CON torque both decreased significantly (p < 0.01) immediately after the VFR intervention and remained significantly lowered up to 20 min, regardless of the vibration frequency. However, there were no significant changes in RFD or CMJ height. Our results suggest that VFR can increase knee flexion ROM but induces a decrease in muscle strength up to 20 min after VFR at both high and low frequencies. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foam roller; countermovement jump; flexibility; maximal voluntary muscle contraction; prolonged effect; rate of force development

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36157391      PMCID: PMC9459764          DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2022.376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   4.017


  35 in total

1.  The acute effect of whole-body low-frequency vibration on countermovement vertical jump performance in college-aged men.

Authors:  Hugh S Lamont; Joel T Cramer; Debra A Bemben; Randa L Shehab; Mark A Anderson; Michael G Bemben
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  A comparative study of whole body vibration training and conventional training on knee proprioception and postural stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  A Moezy; G Olyaei; M Hadian; M Razi; S Faghihzadeh
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  Foam Rolling Prescription: A Clinical Commentary.

Authors:  David G Behm; Shahab Alizadeh; Saman Hadjizadeh Anvar; Mohamed Mamdouh Ibrahim Mahmoud; Emma Ramsay; Courtney Hanlon; Scott Cheatham
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Physiological and methodological aspects of rate of force development assessment in human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  David Rodríguez-Rosell; Fernando Pareja-Blanco; Per Aagaard; Juan José González-Badillo
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.273

5.  Effects of 5-Week Foam Rolling Intervention on Range of Motion and Muscle Stiffness.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kiyono; Remi Onuma; Koki Yasaka; Shigeru Sato; Kaoru Yahata; Masatoshi Nakamura
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Comparison of the Acute Effects of Foam Rolling with High and Low Vibration Frequencies on Eccentrically Damaged Muscle.

Authors:  Kazuki Kasahara; Riku Yoshida; Kaoru Yahata; Shigeru Sato; Yuta Murakami; Kodai Aizawa; Andreas Konrad; Masatoshi Nakamura
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Effects of static stretching programs performed at different volume-equated weekly frequencies on passive properties of muscle-tendon unit.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Shigeru Sato; Kakeru Hiraizumi; Ryosuke Kiyono; Taizan Fukaya; Satoru Nishishita
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Foam Rolling on Performance and Recovery.

Authors:  Thimo Wiewelhove; Alexander Döweling; Christoph Schneider; Laura Hottenrott; Tim Meyer; Michael Kellmann; Mark Pfeiffer; Alexander Ferrauti
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Does Vibration Foam Roller Influence Performance and Recovery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alejandra Alonso-Calvete; Miguel Lorenzo-Martínez; Alexis Padrón-Cabo; Alexandra Pérez-Ferreirós; Anton Kalén; Cristian Abelairas-Gómez; Ezequiel Rey
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.