Literature DB >> 35321127

Sex Differences in the Mechanical and Neurophysiological Response to Roller Massage of the Plantar Flexors.

Masatoshi Nakamura1,2, Andreas Konrad3, Kiyono Ryosuke1, Shigeru Sato1, Kaoru Yahata1, Riku Yoshida2, Yuta Murakami2, Futaba Sanuki2, Jan Wilke4.   

Abstract

Self-massage using foam rollers, sticks, or balls has become a popular technique to enhance joint range of motion (ROM). Although increases are reported to be larger in females than males, the mechanisms of this observation are unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of roller massage (RM) on ROM, passive tissue stiffness, and neurophysiological markers as a function of sex. Males (n = 15, 22.8 ± 2.9 yrs.) and females (n = 14, 21.1 ± 0.7 yrs.) performed three 60-second bouts of calf RM. Outcomes assessed pre-, and post-intervention included passive dorsiflexion (DF) ROM, passive tissue stiffness, passive torque, DF angle at the first stretch sensation, shear elastic modulus, and spinal excitability. DF ROM (+35.9 %), passive torque at DF ROM (+46.4 %), DF angle at first stretch sensation (+32.9 %), and pain pressure threshold (+25.2 %) increased in both groups (p<.05) with no differences between males and females (p > 0.05). No changes were observed for passive stiffness, shear elastic modulus, and spinal excitability (p > 0.05). Roller massage may increase ROM independently of sex, which, in the present study, could not be ascribed to alterations in passive stiffness or neurophysiological markers. Future studies may further elucidate the role of sensory alterations as possible factors driving RM-induced changes in flexibility. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H/M ratio; Shear elastic modulus; dorsiflexion range of motion; pain pressure threshold; passive torque; stretch tolerance

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35321127      PMCID: PMC8488844          DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2021.665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  36 in total

1.  Influence of Foam Rolling Velocity on Knee Range of Motion and Tissue Stiffness: A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Jan Wilke; Philipp Niemeyer; Daniel Niederer; Robert Schleip; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 1.931

2.  Higher Quadriceps Roller Massage Forces Do Not Amplify Range-of-Motion Increases nor Impair Strength and Jump Performance.

Authors:  Lena Grabow; James D Young; Lynsey R Alcock; Patrick J Quigley; Jeannette M Byrne; Urs Granacher; Jakob Škarabot; David G Behm
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  An acute session of roller massage prolongs voluntary torque development and diminishes evoked pain.

Authors:  Mark Tyler Cavanaugh; Alexander Döweling; James Douglas Young; Patrick John Quigley; Daniel David Hodgson; Joseph H D Whitten; Jonathan C Reid; Saied Jalal Aboodarda; David G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Preventive and Regenerative Foam Rolling are Equally Effective in Reducing Fatigue-Related Impairments of Muscle Function following Exercise.

Authors:  Johannes Fleckenstein; Jan Wilke; Lutz Vogt; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Acute Effects of Foam Rolling on Range of Motion in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review with Multilevel Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan Wilke; Anna-Lena Müller; Florian Giesche; Gerard Power; Hamid Ahmedi; David G Behm
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Comparison of the Acute Effects of Hold-Relax and Static Stretching among Older Adults.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Shigeru Sato; Ryosuke Kiyono; Kaoru Yahata; Riku Yoshida; Taizan Fukaya; Andreas Konrad
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05

7.  Pain pressure threshold of a muscle tender spot increases following local and non-local rolling massage.

Authors:  S J Aboodarda; A J Spence; Duane C Button
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The acute and prolonged effects of 20-s static stretching on muscle strength and shear elastic modulus.

Authors:  Shigeru Sato; Ryosuke Kiyono; Nobushige Takahashi; Tomoichi Yoshida; Kosuke Takeuchi; Masatoshi Nakamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Acute Effect of Foam Rolling on Eccentrically-Induced Muscle Damage.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Koki Yasaka; Ryosuke Kiyono; Remi Onuma; Kaoru Yahata; Shigeru Sato; Andreas Konrad
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Effects of ballistic stretching training on the properties of human muscle and tendon structures.

Authors:  Andreas Konrad; Markus Tilp
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-05-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  An Intense Warm-Up Does Not Potentiate Performance Before or After a Single Bout of Foam Rolling.

Authors:  Andreas Konrad; Daniel Bernsteiner; Marina Maren Reiner; Masatoshi Nakamura; Markus Tilp
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.017

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.