Literature DB >> 31852630

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large gastric stromal tumors.

Qiaofeng Chen1, Mingju Yu1, Yupeng Lei1, Chang Zhong1, Zhijian Liu1, Xiaojiang Zhou1, Guohua Li1, Xiaodong Zhou2, Youxiang Chen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric stromal tumors is becoming increasingly common. However, there have been few studies analyzing the therapeutic efficacy and safety of this technique on large (≥ 3 cm) gastric stromal tumors (LGSTs). The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of ESD for the removal of LGSTs and to investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of ESD for this indication.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 82 patients with LGSTs who underwent an ESD. Data on therapeutic outcomes and follow-up were collected for an analysis of the rates of en block resection and complete resection. A logistic regression model was used to identify potential risk factors for ESD-related complications, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated for qualifying independent risk factors.
RESULTS: En bloc resection was achieved in 81 lesions (98.8%), and complete resection was achieved in 80 lesions (97.6%). The rates of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding were 6.1% and 3.7%, respectively. The accidental perforation rate was 12.2%, the postoperative perforation rate was 3.7%, the intentional perforation rate was 28.0%, and the postoperative infection rate was 12.2%. There was no postoperative mortality. LGSTs originating from the deep muscularis propria (MP) layer (OR = 4.905, 95% CI: 1.362-17.658, P = 0.015), located at the gastric fundus (OR = 4.927, 95% CI:1.308-18.558, P = 0.018) and with an irregular shape (OR = 4.842, 95% CI: 1.242-18.870, P = 0.023) increased the rate of complications. The prediction model that incorporated these factors demonstrated an area under the ROC curve of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.89). No tumor recurrence or distant metastasis was observed during the follow-up period, which ranged from 6-36 months.
CONCLUSIONS: ESD is a feasible, safe, effective and minimally invasive approach for the resection of LGSTs. Tumors originating from the deep MP layer, located at the fundus and with an irregular shape were identified as risk factors for the development of complications.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Efficacy; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Large gastric stromal tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31852630     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2019.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2210-7401            Impact factor:   2.947


  4 in total

1.  Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumors: a long-term retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Yuzhu Yuan; Lixin Sun; Xiaoying Zhou; Han Chen; Xinmin Si; Weifeng Zhang; Yun Wang; Bixing Ye; Nana Tang; Guoxin Zhang; Xueliang Li; Hongjie Zhang; Chunhua Jiao
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 7.701

Review 2.  Anticoagulation and antiplatelet management in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review of current evidence.

Authors:  Andrew Chan; Hamish Philpott; Amanda H Lim; Minnie Au; Derrick Tee; Damian Harding; Mohamed Asif Chinnaratha; Biju George; Rajvinder Singh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-11-16

3.  Long-term endoscopic submucosal dissection with postoperative lung injury: a case report.

Authors:  Qian-Mei Zhu; Hong Tu; Bing Hu; Xiao Wang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Comparative Study on the Clinical Effects of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Jinyan Wu; Boneng Mao; Tao Jin; Xinfang Xu; Xiao Xu; Shengjun Jiang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.