Literature DB >> 35752993

Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumors: a long-term retrospective case-control study.

Yuzhu Yuan1, Lixin Sun1, Xiaoying Zhou2, Han Chen2, Xinmin Si2, Weifeng Zhang2, Yun Wang2, Bixing Ye2, Nana Tang2, Guoxin Zhang2, Xueliang Li2, Hongjie Zhang2, Chunhua Jiao3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic resection (ER) is an effective treatment method for gastric submucosal tumors (G-SMTs), but endoscopic resection failure requires emergency surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess potential risk factors for endoscopic resection failure.
METHODS: A total of 1041 patients with G-SMT undergoing endoscopic resection were enrolled. Twenty-five patients in whom endoscopic resection failed, requiring a transition to surgery midway through the operation, were included in the failed group, and 1016 patients who received successful endoscopic resection were included in the successful endoscopic resection group. Baseline and lesion characteristics were recorded, and the differences in tumor characteristics and risk factors for resection failure of G-SMT were analyzed. Sensitivity analysis was performed to detect the stability of the indicator.
RESULTS: Of the 1041cases included, there were 25 cases (2.4%) of failed endoscopic resection. Binary logistic analysis showed that the independent risk factors included tumors originating from deep muscularis propria(OR = 14.42, 95% CI 4.47-46.52), size > 3 cm (OR = 7.75, 95% CI 2.64-22.70), exophytic growth pattern (OR = 4.98, 95% CI 1.62-15.29), endoscopist with less experience (OR = 5.99, 95% CI 1.07-12.19), and irregular borders (OR = 4.13, 95% CI 1.40-12.19). The stable risk factors were tumors size, tumor origin and growth pattern according to sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumors originating from the deep muscularis propria, tumor size > 3 cm, endoscopists with less experience, an exophytic growth pattern, and irregular boundaries were found to be independent risk factors for endoscopic resection failure. To reduce the risk of endoscopic resection failure, physicians should carefully evaluate G-SMT characteristics preoperative.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case–control study; Endoscopic resection; Gastric submucosal tumors; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35752993     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-022-01306-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.701


  45 in total

1.  NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Cristina R Antonescu; Ronald P DeMatteo; Kristen N Ganjoo; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; Chandrajit P Raut; Richard F Riedel; Scott Schuetze; Hema M Sundar; Jonathan C Trent; Jeffrey D Wayne
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 2.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors.

Authors:  Ming-Yan Cai; Francisco Martin Carreras-Presas; Ping-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.559

3.  Cytologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: cytomorphologic and immunohistochemical study of 12 cases.

Authors:  M Gu; S Ghafari; P T Nguyen; F Lin
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.582

Review 4.  Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors.

Authors:  Toshirou Nishida; Naoki Kawai; Shinjiro Yamaguchi; Yoshiki Nishida
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 7.559

5.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of large gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a single center study.

Authors:  F S Meng; Z H Zhang; G D Shan; Y P Chen; F Ji
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Long-term outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection is comparable to that of surgery for early gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Hye Kyung Jeon; Gwang Ha Kim; Bong Eun Lee; Do Youn Park; Geun Am Song; Dae Hwan Kim; Tae Yong Jeon
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 7.  Review article: the biology, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Authors:  N Iorio; R A Sawaya; F K Friedenberg
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Endoscopic diagnosis of submucosal gastric lesions. The results after routine endoscopy.

Authors:  J L Hedenbro; M Ekelund; P Wetterberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Classification of submucosal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Laura-Graves Ponsaing; Katalin Kiss; Mark-Berner Hansen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Advances in the Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumor: Pathologic Diagnosis Using Endoscopy without Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.

Authors:  Hang Lak Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.