| Literature DB >> 31851785 |
Christopher J Charles1,2,3, Philip Lee4, Renee R Li1,2, Teresa Yeung1,2, Stephane M Ibraham Mazlan1,2, Zhi Wei Tay4, Desiree Abdurrachim4, Xing Qi Teo4, Wei-Hsin Wang4, Dominique P V de Kleijn5,6, Patrick J Cozzone4, Carolyn S P Lam1,7,8,9,10, A Mark Richards1,3.
Abstract
AIMS: A significant proportion of heart failure (HF) patients have HF preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The lack of effective treatments for HFpEF remains a critical unmet need. A key obstacle to therapeutic innovation in HFpEF is the paucity of pre-clinical models. Although several large animal models have been reported, few demonstrate progression to decompensated HF. We have established a model of HFpEF by enhancing a porcine model of progressive left ventricular (LV) pressure overload and characterized HF in this model including advanced cardiometabolic imaging using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and hyperpolarized carbon-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopy. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Animal model; BNP; CMRI hyperpolarizer; Cardiac fibrosis; Hypertrophy; Left ventricular pressure overload
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31851785 PMCID: PMC7083424 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Figure 1Serial body weight, pressure gradients across aortic arch, left ventricular mass/body weight (LVmass/BW) ratios, and echocardiography derived serial left ventricular dimensions including interventricular septum thickness at diastole, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at diastole and left ventricular internal diameter at diastole in 20 pigs with progressive inflation of aortic cuff to induce left ventricular hypertrophy (●) and six sham control (◯) pigs. Values shown are mean + standard error of the mean. Significant differences at time‐matched points between the sham and aortic cuff to induce left ventricular hypertrophy pigs are indicated as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2Echocardiography derived serial left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in 20 aortic cuff to induce left ventricular hypertrophy (●) and six sham control (◯) pigs. Values shown are mean + standard error of the mean.
Figure 3Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging derived left ventricular end diastolic volume, end systolic volume, stroke volume, ejection fraction, peak filling and ejection rates, cardiac output and left atrial end‐diastolic (ED) volume in 20 aortic cuff to induce left ventricular hypertrophy (●) and six sham control (◯) pigs. Values shown are mean + standard error of the mean. Left atrial end‐diastolic volume was significantly increased at 42 days compared with baseline (*P < 0.05) and left ventricular peak filling rate increased in aortic cuff to induce left ventricular hypertrophy pigs compared with sham (**P < 0.01).
Figure 4Top panel – cardiac MRI T1 MOLLI values across 17 segments of the LV at baseline and end of study in 20 cuff‐LVH (●) and 6 sham control (◯) pigs. Bottom panels – examples on picrosirius red staining of sections of the LV free wall and group mean intensities from sham and cuff‐LVH pigs measured under bright field and polarizing light. Values shown are mean + SEM. Significant differences at time‐matched points between the sham and cuff‐LVH pigs are indicated as follows: *P < 0.05, †P < 0.01 and ‡P < 0.001.
Figure 5Top panels – invasive pulmonary capillary (PC) wedge pressure and LV end diastolic pressure in 5 cuff‐LVH (●) and 6 sham control (◯) pigs. Lower panels – plasma B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in cuff‐LVH (●) and sham control (◯) pigs. Values shown are mean + SEM. Significant differences at time‐matched points between the sham and cuff‐LVH pigs are indicated as follows: *P < 0.05 and †P < 0.01.
Figure 6Metabolic signals from hyperpolarizing 13C magnetic resonance imaging (A) 13C spectra from a normal (sham) pig and (B) metabolite/pyruvate signal from 11 aortic cuff to induce left ventricular hypertrophy (●) and six sham control (◯) pigs. Values shown are mean + standard error of the mean. The units are in arbitrary units and normalized to the [1‐13C]pyruvate peak amplitude of each animal. Significant differences at time‐matched points between the sham and aortic cuff to induce left ventricular hypertrophy pigs are indicated as follows: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.