| Literature DB >> 24744855 |
Jessica A Hiemstra1, Songtao Liu2, Mark A Ahlman2, Karl H Schuleri3, Albert C Lardo3, Christopher P Baines4, Kevin C Dellsperger5, David A Bluemke2, Craig A Emter1.
Abstract
We recently reported that mitochondrial dysfunction, characterized by increased mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT), was present in a translational swine model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Cyclophilin D is a key component of the MPT pore, therefore, the purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of a novel cyclosporine (CsA) dosing scheme as a therapeutic alternative for HFpEF. Computed tomography (CT), two-dimensional speckle tracking two-dimensional speckle tracking (2DST), and invasive hemodynamics were used to evaluate cardiac function. CT imaging showed 14 weeks of CsA treatment caused eccentric myocardial remodeling (contrasting concentric remodeling in untreated HF animals) and elevated systemic pressures. 2DST detected left ventricular (LV) mechanics associated with systolic and diastolic dysfunction prior to the onset of significantly increased LV end diastolic pressure including: (1) decreased systolic apical rotation rate, longitudinal displacement, and longitudinal/radial/circumferential strain; (2) decreased early diastolic untwisting and longitudinal strain rate; and (3) increased late diastolic radial/circumferential mitral strain rate. LV mechanics associated with systolic and diastolic impairment was enhanced to a greater extent than seen in untreated HF animals following CsA treatment. In conclusion, CsA treatment accelerated the development of heart failure, including dilatory LV remodeling and impaired systolic and diastolic mechanics. Although our findings do not support CsA as a viable therapy for HFpEF, 2DST was effective in differentiating between progressive gradations of developing HF and detecting diastolic impairment prior to the development of overt diastolic dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: 2D speckle tracking; CT; HFpEF; cyclosporine; diastolic heart failure
Year: 2013 PMID: 24744855 PMCID: PMC3970750 DOI: 10.1002/phy2.174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
CT and Hemodynamic analysis of resting systolic and diastolic function 20 weeks post aortic banding.
| CON | HF | HF‐CsA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic function | |||
| HR (beats/min) | 126 ± 5 | 106 ± 4* | 114 ± 4§ |
| MAP (mmHg) | 53 ± 11 | 59 ± 4 | 86 ± 8*,† |
| LV ESV (mL) | 32 ± 3 | 24 ± 2 | 43 ± 3† |
| LV ESP (mmHg) | 65 ± 7 | 81 ± 6 | 109 ± 9* |
| LV EF (%) | 54 ± 2 | 56 ± 4 | 47 ± 3 |
| LA ESV (mL) | 25 ± 2 | 28 ± 1 | 44 ± 3*,† |
| LA EF (%) | 47 ± 1 | 40 ± 5 | 33 ± 2* |
| Diastolic function | |||
| LV EDV (mL) | 70 ± 8 | 57 ± 6 | 80 ± 4† |
| LV EDP (mmHg) | 11 ± 1 | 11 ± 1 | 15 ± 1*,† |
| LA EDV (mL) | 47 ± 2 | 46 ± 1 | 65 ± 3*,† |
| Morphology | |||
| LV Mass (g) | 85 ± 4 | 87 ± 3 | 103 ± 3*,† |
| LV Mass:Vol (g/mL) | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1*,‡ | 1.3 ± 0.1 |
Values are means ± SE. HR, heart rate; MAP, mean arterial pressure; LV ESV, left ventricular end systolic volume; LV ESP, left ventricular end systolic pressure; LV EF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LA ESV, left atrial end systolic volume; LA EF, left atrial ejection fraction; LV EDV,, left ventricular end diastolic volume; LV EDP,, left ventricular end diastolic pressure; LA EDV, left atrial end diastolic volume; LV mass:Vol, LV free wall mass:LV EDV ratio. Significance is indicated at *P < 0.05 versus CON; †P < 0.05 versus HF; ‡P < 0.05 versus HF‐CsA; §P = 0.08 versus CON.
Figure 1.Cyclosporine treatment increases body weight (*P < 0.05 HF‐CsA versus CON and HF).
Group weight and postmortem assessment of whole heart morphology.
| CON | HF | HF‐CsA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (kg) | 35 ± 1 | 36 ± 1 | 46 ± 1*,† |
| Heart weight (g) | 174 ± 6 | 206 ± 11* | 245 ± 4*,† |
| HW:BW (g/kg) | 5.0 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.3‡ | 5.4 ± 0.1 |
Values are means ± SE. HW:BW, heart weight:body weight ratio. Significance is indicated at *P < 0.05 versus CON; †P < 0.05 versus HF; ‡P < 0.10 versus CON.
Figure 2.LV late diastolic longitudinal and mitral radial strain rates. (A–B) Cyclosporine acutely (2 weeks) reduces global late diastolic longitudinal and mitral valve radial strain rates, but increases both following 14 weeks of treatment. (*P < 0.05 vs. CON; †P < 0.05 vs. HF)
Figure 3.LV early diastolic untwisting and longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain rates. (A) Peak global LV rotation rate during early diastole is reduced in both HF and HF‐CsA animals. (B) Longitudinal strain rate in the LV free wall during early diastole is reduced in following CsA treatment beyond that observed in HF animals. (C) Early diastolic circumferential strain rate in the apex of the LV is reduced after 14 weeks of CsA treatment. (D) Apical LV early diastolic radial strain rate is increased in HF animals 6 weeks post aortic banding (2 weeks), and reduced after 14 weeks of CsA treatment. (*P < 0.05 vs. CON; †P < 0.05 vs. HF)
Figure 4.LV torsion and apical systolic rotation rates. (A–B) Torsion is reduced in HF‐CsA animals independent of normalization to LV morphology after 14 weeks of treatment. Preservation of torsion in the HF group recapitulates previous findings from our lab. (C) cyclosporine treatment reduces apical global peak systolic rotation rate beyond that observed in HF animals. (*P < 0.05 vs. CON; †P < 0.05 vs. HF)
Figure 5.LV systolic longitudinal displacement. (A–B) Cyclosporine treatment reduces longitudinal (apex to base) and transverse longitudinal (free wall to septum) displacement during systole at 3 of 4 measured time points in contrast to HF animals, in which displacement was only reduced 20 weeks post aortic banding (14 weeks). (*P < 0.05 vs. CON; †P < 0.05 vs. HF)
Figure 6.LV systolic longitudinal, radial, and circumferential strain. (A) Cyclosporine treatment reduces longitudinal transverse (free wall to septum) strain. (B) Radial systolic strain is acutely reduced in HF‐CsA animals beyond that observed in the HF group, but this difference is abrogated after 14 weeks of CsA treatment. (C) Cyclosporine treatment reduces longitudinal (apex to base) systolic strain at all measured time points in contrast to HF animals, in which displacement was only reduced 20 weeks post aortic banding (14 weeks). (D) Circumferential systolic strain is reduced in both HF‐CsA and HF animals compared to CON. (*P < 0.05 vs. CON; †P < 0.05 vs. HF)