Literature DB >> 31849566

Comparison of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Abdominal Total Hysterectomy in Patients with Benign Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Hiroki Nagata1, Hiroaki Komatsu1, Yohei Nagaya2, Satoru Tsukihara2, Masako Sarugami2, Tasuku Harada1, Yasunobu Kanamori2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to determine whether total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is being implemented safely and appropriately compared with abdominal total hysterectomy (ATH) in our hospital.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 102 patients who underwent total hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease at Japanese Red Cross Yamaguchi Hospital from January 2017 to August 2018. We examined periods of hospital stay, operation time, blood loss, weight of the uterus, frequency of perioperative complications, and the duration from the first visit to the date of surgery. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant indicated statistical significance.
RESULTS: TLH and ATH were performed in 55 (53%) and 47 (46%) cases, respectively. The TLH group had significantly longer total operation time [133 (82-205) min vs. 87 (57-155) min, P < 0.0001], lesser blood loss [5 (5-35) g vs. 100 (10-820) g, P < 0.0001], shorter hospital stay [7 (5-14) days vs. 10 (9-26) days, P < 0.0001], and lighter uterine weight [206 (27-658) g vs. 554 (79-2284) g, P < 0.0001] than the ATH group. The frequency of perioperative complications did not differ between the two groups (3.5% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.4103).
CONCLUSION: TLH had a longer operation time and a lesser excised uterine weight, but it had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and no difference in perioperative complication frequency when compared with ATH. ©2019 Tottori University Medical Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal total hysterectomy; comparison; total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31849566      PMCID: PMC6872949          DOI: 10.33160/yam.2019.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonago Acta Med        ISSN: 0513-5710            Impact factor:   1.641


  9 in total

1.  Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Athanasios Protopapas; Kris Jardon; Nicola Bourdel; Revaz Botchorishvili; Benoit Rabischong; Gérard Mage; Michel Canis
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Bladder and ureteral injuries during benign hysterectomy: an observational cohort analysis in New York State.

Authors:  Cooper R Benson; Stephanie Thompson; Gen Li; Denise Asafu-Adjei; Steven B Brandes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yue-xiong Yi; Wei Zhang; Qi Zhou; Wan-ru Guo; Yu Su
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  A nationwide survey on gynecologic endoscopic surgery in Japan, 2014-2016.

Authors:  Fuminori Taniguchi; Osamu Wada-Hiraike; Tetsuya Hirata; Hiroto Tajima; Hirotaka Masuda; Mari Kitade; Jun Kumakiri; Ichiro Uchiide; Juichiro Saito; Keisuke Kurose; Toshiyuki Takeshita; Tasuku Harada
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 5.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy in case of uteri weighing ≥1 kilogram: a series of 71 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Stefano Uccella; Antonella Cromi; Maurizio Serati; Jvan Casarin; Davide Sturla; Fabio Ghezzi
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial.

Authors:  Monika Janda; Val Gebski; Alison Brand; Russel Hogg; Thomas W Jobling; Russel Land; Tom Manolitsas; Anthony McCartney; Marcelo Nascimento; Deborah Neesham; James L Nicklin; Martin K Oehler; Geoff Otton; Lewis Perrin; Stuart Salfinger; Ian Hammond; Yee Leung; Tom Walsh; Peter Sykes; Hextan Ngan; Andrea Garrett; Michael Laney; Tong Yow Ng; Karfai Tam; Karen Chan; C David H Wrede; Selvan Pather; Bryony Simcock; Rhonda Farrell; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Clinical utility of a novel ultrasonic vessel sealing device in transecting and sealing large vessels during laparoscopic hysterectomy using advanced hemostasis mode.

Authors:  Theodoor E Nieboer; Courtney J Steller; Piet Hinoul; Amanda J Maxson; Michael L Schwiers; Charles E Miller; Sjors F Coppus; Andrew S H Kent
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Christian Schindlbeck; Konstanze Klauser; Darius Dian; Wolfgang Janni; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Complication Rate of Laparoscopic Hysterectomies in Denmark, 2011-2016.

Authors:  Olav Istre; Dorthe Snejbjerg
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  A retrospective study of 323 total laparoscopic hysterectomy cases for various indications and a case report treating caesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Wataru Isono; Akira Tsuchiya; Michiko Honda; Ako Saito; Hiroko Tsuchiya; Reiko Matsuyama; Akihisa Fujimoto; Masashi Kawamoto; Osamu Nishii
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.