Literature DB >> 19509577

Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.

Athanasios Protopapas1, Kris Jardon, Nicola Bourdel, Revaz Botchorishvili, Benoit Rabischong, Gérard Mage, Michel Canis.   

Abstract

Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) has been reported since the early 1990 s. Although the acceptance of TLRH had been slow over the past 15 years, several teams throughout the world have recently reported promising results in the treatment of early cervical cancer with this procedure. Several modifications of the originally described technique have also been reported. From the currently existing data, these is no doubt that TLRH is technically feasible. Its operative safety profile is comparable to that of radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH), and there exist sufficient data to suggest that the histopathologic outcome is also similar in terms of local radicality and lymph node yield. The duration of the procedure has become acceptable but remains still longer in comparison to RAH, in most series. It is now evident that with increasing experience, repetition, standardization, and incorporation of technological advances, duration can be reduced considerably and become similar to that of RAH. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is associated with less blood loss, faster recovery and return of bowel function, reduced febrile morbidity, and a better cosmetic result. Nevertheless, shorter hospitalization in comparison to that observed after RAH is not consistently reported, and return of normal bladder activity is similar to that observed after RAH. It is also true that the currently existing recurrence and survival data are still immature to draw safe conclusions on its long-term oncological safety. Probably, the time has come for a multicenter randomized study between TLRH and RAH with participation of the institutions with significant experience in this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19509577     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a3e2be

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes between laparotomy and robotic technique for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ahmet Göçmen; Fatih Şanlıkan; Mustafa Gazi Uçar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-06-27

2.  Comparison of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Abdominal Total Hysterectomy in Patients with Benign Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hiroki Nagata; Hiroaki Komatsu; Yohei Nagaya; Satoru Tsukihara; Masako Sarugami; Tasuku Harada; Yasunobu Kanamori
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 1.641

3.  Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Hye-Yon Cho; Kidong Kim; Jae Hong No; Yong-Beom Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Puliyath Geetha; M Krishnan Nair
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Total Laparoscopic Versus Laparotomic Radical Hysterectomy and Lymphadenectomy in Cervical Cancer: An Observational Study of 13-Year Experience.

Authors:  Meizhu Xiao; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.