Literature DB >> 20638899

Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial.

Monika Janda1, Val Gebski, Alison Brand, Russel Hogg, Thomas W Jobling, Russel Land, Tom Manolitsas, Anthony McCartney, Marcelo Nascimento, Deborah Neesham, James L Nicklin, Martin K Oehler, Geoff Otton, Lewis Perrin, Stuart Salfinger, Ian Hammond, Yee Leung, Tom Walsh, Peter Sykes, Hextan Ngan, Andrea Garrett, Michael Laney, Tong Yow Ng, Karfai Tam, Karen Chan, C David H Wrede, Selvan Pather, Bryony Simcock, Rhonda Farrell, Andreas Obermair.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This two-stage randomised controlled trial, comparing total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE), began in 2005. The primary objective of stage 1 was to assess whether TLH results in equivalent or improved quality of life (QoL) up to 6 months after surgery compared with TAH. The primary objective of stage 2 was to test the hypothesis that disease-free survival at 4.5 years is equivalent for TLH and TAH. Here, we present the results of stage 1.
METHODS: Between Oct 7, 2005, and April 16, 2008, 361 participants were enrolled in the QoL substudy at 19 centres across Australia, New Zealand, and Hong Kong; 332 completed the QoL analysis. Randomisation was done centrally and independently from other study procedures via a computer-generated, web-based system (providing concealment of the next assigned treatment), using stratified permuted blocks of three and six patients. Patients with histologically confirmed stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than 2 were randomly assigned to TLH (n=190) or TAH (n=142), stratified by histological grade and study centre. Patients and study personnel were not masked to treatment assignment. QoL was measured at baseline, 1 and 4 weeks (early), and 3 and 6 months (late) after surgery, using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire. The primary endpoint was the difference between groups in QoL change from baseline at early and late timepoints (a 5% difference was considered clinically significant). Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle. Patients for both stages of the trial have now been recruited and are being followed up for disease-specific outcomes. The LACE trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00096408.
FINDINGS: Eight of 332 patients (2.4%) had treatment conversion-seven from TLH to TAH and one from TAH to TLH (patient preference). In the early phase of recovery, patients who had TLH reported significantly greater improvement in QoL from baseline compared with those who had TAH, in all subscales apart from emotional and social wellbeing. Improvements in QoL up to 6 months after surgery continued to favour TLH, except in the emotional and social wellbeing measures of FACT and the visual analogue scale of the EuroQoL five dimensions (EuroQoL-VAS). Operating time was significantly longer in the TLH group (138 min [SD 43]) than in the TAH group (109 min [34]; p=0.001). Although the proportion of intraoperative adverse events was similar between groups (TAH eight of 142 [5.6%] vs TLH 14 of 190 [7.4%]; p=0.53); postoperatively, twice as many patients in the TAH group experienced adverse events of grade 3 or higher (33 of 142 [23.2%] vs 22 of 190 [11.6%] in the TLH group; p=0.004). Postoperative serious adverse events occurred more in the TAH group (27 of 142 [19.0%]) than in the TLH group (16 of 190 [7.9%]; p=0.002).
INTERPRETATION: QoL improvements from baseline during early and later phases of recovery, and the adverse event profile, favour TLH compared with TAH for treatment of stage I endometrial cancer. FUNDING: Cancer Council Queensland, Cancer Council New South Wales, Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Council Western Australia; NHMRC project grant 456110; Cancer Australia project grant 631523; The Women and Infants Research Foundation, Western Australia; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Foundation; Wesley Research Institute; Gallipoli Research Foundation; Gynetech; TYCO Healthcare, Australia; Johnson and Johnson Medical, Australia; Hunter New England Centre for Gynaecological Cancer; Genesis Oncology Trust; and Smart Health Research Grant QLD Health. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20638899     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70145-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  65 in total

1.  Surgery: Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Lisa Richards
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2010.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim; Kidong Kim; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Spiritual quality of life in advanced cancer patients receiving radiation therapy.

Authors:  Katherine M Piderman; Mary E Johnson; Marlene H Frost; Pamela J Atherton; Daniel V Satele; Matthew M Clark; Maria I Lapid; Jeff A Sloan; Teresa A Rummans
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Diagnostic laparoscopic biopsy for intraabdominal tumors.

Authors:  Yasuo Sakamoto; Ryuichi Karashima; Satoshi Ida; Yu Imamura; Shiro Iwagami; Yoshifumi Baba; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Current therapy of patients with endometrial carcinoma. A critical review.

Authors:  S Marnitz; C Köhler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Use of Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer - Results of a 2012 Germany-wide Survey.

Authors:  I Juhasz-Böss; P Mallmann; C P Möller; E F Solomayer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  The Advantage of Pinpoint Camera System With Indocyanine Green for Sentinel Lymph Node Micrometastasis Detection in Low Risk Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Alexandros Lazaridis; Stylianos Kogeorgos; Panagiotis Balinakos; Kitty Pavlakis; Theofani Gavresea; George Pistofidis
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  The health-related quality of life journey of gynecologic oncology surgical patients: Implications for the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into surgical quality metrics.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Emma L Barber; Jeannette T Bensen; Anna C Snavely; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Stratification of endometrioid endometrial cancer patients into risk levels using somatic mutations.

Authors:  Donghai Dai; Kristina W Thiel; Erin A Salinas; Michael J Goodheart; Kimberly K Leslie; Jesus Gonzalez Bosquet
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Xianghua Yin; Min Shi; Jianbo Xu; Qinhao Guo; Huan Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.