Literature DB >> 31848315

Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Breast Surgical Oncology: Advancing Toward Value-Based Care.

Mirelle Lagendijk1,2, Elizabeth Mittendorf3,4, Tari A King3,4, Christopher Gibbons3,5, Andrea Pusic5,6, Laura S Dominici3,4.   

Abstract

Value in health care is defined as the health outcome achieved per unit of cost. For health care systems, improving value means achieving better outcomes at lower costs. Improving outcomes, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs), as well as more established metrics such as mortality and complication rates, ensures high-quality care. This is particularly true in breast cancer surgery, where survival and recurrence rates are comparable across different surgical approaches. Outcomes reflecting survivorship quality may therefore better inform decision making regarding surgical approaches. PROs can be assessed using validated instruments known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). They are obtained directly from patients reflecting their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Ongoing initiatives strive to define PROMs that accurately reflect HRQOL and demonstrate value, with the goal of establishing benchmarks for quality of care. Clinicians caring for patients with breast cancer are well positioned to be involved in defining meaningful measures of value-based breast cancer care. This article reviews value-based breast cancer care in the context of locoregional therapy, with attention paid to the work done by the International Consortium of Health Outcome Measures in which a "standard set" of value-based patient-centered outcomes for breast cancer for international use is defined. In addition, an overview is provided of relevant PROMs and previously reported scores. Recommendations and future challenges for implementation of routine collection of PROs are also discussed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Opportunity exists to act as early adopters of the routine collection of longitudinal patient-reported outcome data for breast cancer, allowing transition of current care to value-based cancer care. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer surgery; Patient-reported outcome measures; Quality of life; Value-based cancer care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31848315      PMCID: PMC7216450          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  69 in total

1.  Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Allison M Deal; Amylou C Dueck; Howard I Scher; Mark G Kris; Clifford Hudis; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.

Authors:  Andrea L Pusic; Evan Matros; Neil Fine; Edward Buchel; Gayle M Gordillo; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Ji Qi; Claudia Albornoz; Anne F Klassen; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Patient-Reported Outcomes for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah E Tevis; Ted A James; Henry M Kuerer; Andrea L Pusic; Katharine A Yao; James Merlino; Jill Dietz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Shailesh Agarwal; Lisa Pappas; Leigh Neumayer; Kristine Kokeny; Jayant Agarwal
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Minimal important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Gillian Bedard; Liang Zeng; Liying Zhang; Natalie Lauzon; Lori Holden; May Tsao; Cyril Danjoux; Elizabeth Barnes; Arjun Sahgal; Michael Poon; Edward Chow
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.601

7.  Making Patients and Doctors Happier - The Potential of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Lisa S Rotenstein; Robert S Huckman; Neil W Wagle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The impact of age and clinical factors on quality of life in early breast cancer: an analysis of 2208 women recruited to the UK START Trial (Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy Trial).

Authors:  Penelope Hopwood; Joanne Haviland; Judith Mills; Georges Sumo; Judith M Bliss
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Breast cancer survivors` recollection of their quality of life: Identifying determinants of recall bias in a longitudinal population-based trial.

Authors:  Patricia Lindberg; Petra Netter; Michael Koller; Brunhilde Steinger; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting.

Authors:  Jack Chen; Lixin Ou; Stephanie J Hollis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  Recognizing Disparities in Breast Cancer Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Olga Kantor; Laura Dominici
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.339

2.  Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in Breast Cancer Care Delivery.

Authors:  Navraj S Nagra; Elena Tsangaris; Jessica Means; Michael J Hassett; Laura S Dominici; Jennifer R Bellon; Justin Broyles; Robert S Kaplan; Thomas W Feeley; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 5.344

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.