Literature DB >> 23551530

Minimal important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced cancer.

Gillian Bedard1, Liang Zeng, Liying Zhang, Natalie Lauzon, Lori Holden, May Tsao, Cyril Danjoux, Elizabeth Barnes, Arjun Sahgal, Michael Poon, Edward Chow.   

Abstract

AIMS: Quality of life (QOL) is important in patients with advanced cancer. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 is a general QOL tool used in cancer patients. Often, with a large enough sample, statistical significance of changecan be reached, however the clinical significance is often unknown. This study aimed to determine the magnitude of change that is meaningful to advanced cancer patients in the EORTC QLQ-C30.
METHODS: Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline and 1 month post-radiation to assess changes in their QOL. Minimal important differences (MID) were calculated through anchor and distribution-based methods for improvement and deterioration. The two anchors of overall health and overall QOL were used to determine meaningful change.
RESULTS: Statistically significant meaningful changes were seen in the use of both anchors. The overall health anchor produced a greater number of scales and symptoms that reached a statistically significant meaningful change. Meaningful change for improvement with these two anchors ranged from 9.1 units (cognitive functioning) to 23.5 units (pain), and for deterioration it ranged from 7.2 units (physical functioning) to 13.5 units (role functioning). Distribution-based estimates were closest to 0.5 SD.
CONCLUSION: Knowledge of meaningful change on the EORTC QLQ-C30 allows physicians to assess patients' changes over time, along with evaluating the impact of treatment on a patient's QOL. This knowledge gives insight into whether the treatment is effective and, ultimately, whether it should be continued. Knowledge of MID may assist in the determination of sample size for future trials.
© 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EORTC QLQ-C30; minimal important difference; oncology; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23551530     DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1743-7555            Impact factor:   2.601


  18 in total

1.  Determining clinically important differences in health-related quality of life in older patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy or surgery.

Authors:  C Quinten; C Kenis; L Decoster; P R Debruyne; I De Groof; C Focan; F Cornelis; V Verschaeve; C Bachmann; D Bron; S Luce; G Debugne; H Van den Bulck; J C Goeminne; A Baitar; K Geboers; B Petit; C Langenaeken; R Van Rijswijk; P Specenier; G Jerusalem; J P Praet; K Vandenborre; M Lycke; J Flamaing; K Milisen; J P Lobelle; H Wildiers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Nutritional Online Information for Cancer Patients: a Randomized Trial of an Internet Communication Plus Social Media Intervention.

Authors:  Patrizia Gnagnarella; Alessandro Maria Misotti; Luigi Santoro; Demosthenes Akoumianakis; Laura Del Campo; Francesco De Lorenzo; Claudio Lombardo; Giannis Milolidakis; Richard Sullivan; John Gordon McVie
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of self-administered measurement instruments.

Authors:  Janneke van Roij; Heidi Fransen; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Myrte Zijlstra; Natasja Raijmakers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Nausea in advanced cancer: relationships between intensity, burden, and the need for help.

Authors:  Signe Ladegaard Harder; Mogens Groenvold; Jørn Herrstedt; Anna Thit Johnsen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Breast Surgical Oncology: Advancing Toward Value-Based Care.

Authors:  Mirelle Lagendijk; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Tari A King; Christopher Gibbons; Andrea Pusic; Laura S Dominici
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-17

6.  Interpreting Within-Patient Changes on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13.

Authors:  Cheryl D Coon; Michael Schlichting; Xinke Zhang
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  Intravesical electromotive drug administration for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jae Hung Jung; Ahmet Gudeloglu; Halil Kiziloz; Gretchen M Kuntz; Alea Miller; Badrinath R Konety; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-12

Review 8.  Primary cryotherapy for localised or locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jae Hung Jung; Michael C Risk; Robert Goldfarb; Balaji Reddy; Bernadette Coles; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-30

9.  Effect of Hospital to Home nutrition management model on postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Guihua Song; Haizhen Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures-a systematic review.

Authors:  Åsa Nordin; Charles Taft; Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson; Anna Dencker
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.