Literature DB >> 34374913

Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in Breast Cancer Care Delivery.

Navraj S Nagra1,2, Elena Tsangaris3, Jessica Means3, Michael J Hassett4, Laura S Dominici4, Jennifer R Bellon4, Justin Broyles3, Robert S Kaplan5, Thomas W Feeley5, Andrea L Pusic3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of healthcare costs is required to assess and improve the value of oncology care.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the cost of breast cancer care provision across collaborating health care organizations.
METHODS: We used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to calculate the complete cost of breast cancer care-initial treatment planning, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgical resection and reconstruction, and ancillary services (e.g., psychosocial oncology, physical therapy)-across multiple hospital sites. Data were collected between December 2019 and February 2020. TDABC steps involved (1) developing process maps for care delivery pathways; (2) determine capacity cost rates for staff, medical equipment, and hospital space; (3) measure the time required for each process step, both manually through clinic observation and using data from the Real-Time Location System (RTLS); and (4) calculate the total cost of care delivery.
RESULTS: Surgical care costs ranged from $1431 for a lumpectomy to $12,129 for a mastectomy with prepectoral implant reconstruction. Radiation therapy was costed at $1224 for initial simulation and patient education, and $200 for each additional treatment. Base costs for chemotherapy delivery were $382 per visit, with additional costs driven by chemotherapy agent(s) administered. Personnel expenses were the greatest contributor to the cost of surgical care, except in mastectomy with implant reconstruction, where device costs equated to up to 60% of the cost of surgery.
CONCLUSION: The cost of complete breast cancer care depended on (1) treatment protocols; (2) patient choice of reconstruction; and (3) the need for ancillary services (e.g., physical therapy). Understanding the actual costs and cost drivers of breast cancer care delivery may better inform resource utilization to lower the cost and improve the quality of care.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34374913     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10465-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  14 in total

1.  Utilizing time-driven activity-based costing to understand the short- and long-term costs of treating localized, low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Aaron A Laviana; Annette M Ilg; Darlene Veruttipong; Hung-Jui Tan; Michael A Burke; Douglas R Niedzwiecki; Patrick A Kupelian; Chris R King; Michael L Steinberg; Chandan R Kundavaram; Mitchell Kamrava; Alan L Kaplan; Andrew K Moriarity; William Hsu; Daniel J A Margolis; Jim C Hu; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer: how much does it really cost?

Authors:  Yolande Lievens; Caroline Obyn; Anne-Sophie Mertens; Dries Van Halewyck; Frank Hulstaert
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Using time-driven activity-based costing to identify value improvement opportunities in healthcare.

Authors:  Robert S Kaplan; Mary Witkowski; Megan Abbott; Alexis Barboza Guzman; Laurence D Higgins; John G Meara; Erin Padden; Apurva S Shah; Peter Waters; Marco Weidemeier; Sam Wertheimer; Thomas W Feeley
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing for Surgical Episodes.

Authors:  Peter A Najjar; Matt Strickland; Robert S Kaplan
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 5.  Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Breast Surgical Oncology: Advancing Toward Value-Based Care.

Authors:  Mirelle Lagendijk; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Tari A King; Christopher Gibbons; Andrea Pusic; Laura S Dominici
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-17

6.  A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative.

Authors:  Wee Loon Ong; Maartje G Schouwenburg; Annelotte C M van Bommel; Caleb Stowell; Kim H Allison; Karen E Benn; John P Browne; Rodney D Cooter; Geoff P Delaney; Francois P Duhoux; Patricia A Ganz; Patricia Hancock; Reshma Jagsi; Felicia M Knaul; Anne M Knip; Linetta B Koppert; Henry M Kuerer; Sarah McLaughin; Marc A M Mureau; Ann H Partridge; Dereesa Purtell Reid; Lisa Sheeran; Thomas J Smith; Mark J Stoutjesdijk; Marie Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Yvonne Wengström; Cheng-Har Yip; Christobel Saunders
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Relationship between occurrence of surgical complications and hospital finances.

Authors:  Sunil Eappen; Bennett H Lane; Barry Rosenberg; Stuart A Lipsitz; David Sadoff; Dave Matheson; William R Berry; Mark Lester; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparison of Treatment Costs for Breast Cancer, by Tumor Stage and Type of Service.

Authors:  Helen Blumen; Kathryn Fitch; Vincent Polkus
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2016-02

9.  Measuring the value of process improvement initiatives in a preoperative assessment center using time-driven activity-based costing.

Authors:  Katy E French; Heidi W Albright; John C Frenzel; James R Incalcaterra; Augustin C Rubio; Jessica F Jones; Thomas W Feeley
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2013-09-13

10.  Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Andrea L Pusic; Amie Scott; Jennifer Klok; Stefan J Cano
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.