| Literature DB >> 31843905 |
Wu-Bing Xu1,2,3,4, Jens-Christian Svenning3,4, Guo-Ke Chen1, Ming-Gang Zhang5, Ji-Hong Huang6, Bin Chen7, Alejandro Ordonez3,4, Ke-Ping Ma8,2.
Abstract
Human activities have shaped large-scale distributions of many species, driving both range contractions and expansions. Species differ naturally in range size, with small-range species concentrated in particular geographic areas and potentially deviating ecologically from widespread species. Hence, species' responses to human activities may be influenced by their geographic range sizes, but if and how this happens are poorly understood. Here, we use a comprehensive distribution database and species distribution modeling to examine if and how human activities have affected the extent to which 9,701 vascular plants fill their climatic potential ranges in China. We find that narrow-ranged species have lower range filling and widespread species have higher range filling in the human-dominated southeastern part of China, compared with their counterparts distributed in the less human-influenced northwestern part. Variations in range filling across species and space are strongly associated with indicators of human activities (human population density, human footprint, and proportion of cropland) even after controlling for alternative drivers. Importantly, narrow-ranged and widespread species show negative and positive range-filling relationships to these human indicators, respectively. Our results illustrate that floras risk biotic homogenization as a consequence of anthropogenic activities, with narrow-ranged species becoming replaced by widespread species. Because narrow-ranged species are more numerous than widespread species in nature, negative impacts of human activities will be prevalent. Our findings highlight the importance of establishing more protected areas and zones of reduced human activities to safeguard the rich flora of China.Entities:
Keywords: biotic homogenization; land use; plant species distribution; range filling; range size
Year: 2019 PMID: 31843905 PMCID: PMC6936463 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1911851116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Human impacts on species range filling of vascular plants in China. (A) HPD across China at the 20 × 20-km resolution. The dashed line indicates the Hu Huanyong Line, which separates China into the northwestern and southeastern parts. Grid cells with low and high HPD (classified by the median, 13.5 people per square kilometer) are separated with black outlines. (B) Histogram of species range filling. Blue and green show those species with >80% of their ranges in the southeastern or northwestern parts, respectively, and yellow shows the remaining species. The red vertical dashed line shows the median of range filling. (C) Comparisons of range filling between the northwestern and southeastern species within the 30% most narrow-ranging species (≤1,145 grid cells) and the 30% most wide-ranging species (≥2,475 grid cells). Numbers above the boxplot show the number of species in each category. ***P < 0.001. (D) Contour plot showing the interaction effect between HPD and range size on species range filling. The range filling in the plot is the predicted values by a beta-regression model while keeping other predictors as their mean observed values.
Beta regression of species range filling against the explanatory variables
| Estimate | SE | |||
| HPD | 0.041 | 0.014 | 3.06 | 0.002 |
| EleR | 0.175 | 0.011 | 16.22 | <0.001 |
| Anomaly | 0.070 | 0.015 | 4.66 | <0.001 |
| MAT | 0.104 | 0.019 | 5.43 | <0.001 |
| RZ | 0.499 | 0.009 | 58.68 | <0.001 |
| HPD × RZ | 0.086 | 0.007 | 11.60 | <0.001 |
Estimate, standardized regression coefficients; pseudo R2 = 0.344. Mean annual precipitation was excluded by model selection. Anomaly, temperature anomaly since the Last Glacial Maximum; EleR, elevation range within grid cells; RZ, species observed range size.
Fig. 2.Geographic patterns of grid-cell mean range filling for all species (A), the 30% most narrow-ranging species (B), and the 30% most wide-ranging species (C). Grid cells without data are shown in gray.
Fig. 3.Relationships between grid-cell mean range filling and HPD for all species (A), the 30% most narrow-ranging species (B), and the 30% most wide-ranging species (C). The lines are fitted with simple linear regressions. HPD is log10-transformed.
Multiple linear regressions of grid-cell mean range filling of all species, the 30% most narrow-ranging species, and the 30% most wide-ranging species against the explanatory variables and the selected eigenvector-based spatial filters
| Estimate | SE | Partial | ||||
| All species | ||||||
| Full model | 0.719 | |||||
| HPD | 0.29 | 0.07 | 4.41 | <0.001 | 0.077 | |
| EleR | −0.35 | 0.04 | −7.69 | <0.001 | 0.203 | |
| Anomaly | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.51 | 0.611 | 0.001 | |
| MAT | 0.22 | 0.10 | 2.25 | 0.025 | 0.021 | |
| MAP | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.937 | 0.000 | |
| 14 spatial filters | <0.05 | |||||
| Narrow-ranged species | ||||||
| Full model | 0.586 | |||||
| HPD | −0.28 | 0.08 | −3.67 | <0.001 | 0.059 | |
| EleR | 0.08 | 0.05 | 1.55 | 0.123 | 0.011 | |
| Anomaly | 0.23 | 0.10 | 2.29 | 0.023 | 0.024 | |
| MAT | 0.23 | 0.11 | 2.16 | 0.032 | 0.021 | |
| MAP | −0.11 | 0.07 | −1.49 | 0.137 | 0.010 | |
| 11 spatial filters | <0.05 | |||||
| Widespread species | ||||||
| Full model | 0.898 | |||||
| HPD | 0.15 | 0.05 | 3.17 | 0.002 | 0.040 | |
| EleR | −0.13 | 0.03 | −5.16 | <0.001 | 0.100 | |
| Anomaly | −0.10 | 0.04 | −2.52 | 0.012 | 0.026 | |
| MAT | 0.31 | 0.05 | 5.96 | <0.001 | 0.129 | |
| MAP | 0.31 | 0.04 | 7.62 | <0.001 | 0.195 | |
| 8 spatial filters | <0.05 | |||||
Estimate, standardized regression coefficients; R2, R2 of full models; partial R2, partial R2 of each variable in the models. Anomaly, temperature anomaly since the Last Glacial Maximum; EleR, elevation range within grid cells.