Michele L Ybarra1, Julia Santana Parrilla2, Jennifer Wolowic2, Margaret Rosario3, Carol Goodenow4, Elizabeth Saewyc2. 1. Center for Innovative Public Health Research, San Clemente, CA. Electronic address: MICHELE@InnovativePublicHealth.org. 2. Stigma and Resilience Among Vulnerable Youth Centre (SARAVYC), University of British Columbia, School of Nursing, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 3. Department of Psychology, The City University of New York-City College and Graduate Center, New York, NY. 4. Independent consultant, Northborough, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To address the significant dearth of literature that examines how girls who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or who have another nonheterosexual identity (LGB+) decide when and with whom to have sex; and to explore why inexperienced LGB+ girls might have sex with girls or boys. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted 8 online, asynchronous, bulletin board-style focus groups with 160 adolescent girls 14-18 years of age. The transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis of each girls' responses to the questions. Analyses were focused on increasing our understanding of sexual health decision making among LGB+ teenage girls (eg, "What was the reason you had sex for the first time?"). Participants' responses reflected their day-to-day experiences and roles of cisgender LGB+ girls inside a dominant heteronormative social structure. RESULTS: Some LGB+ girls talked about the perception that LGB+ girls were presumed or expected to be hypersexual, and that they did not feel they could be accepted as LGB+ without being sexually active. Developmental aspects of identity were also salient: Girls considered or engaged in sexual encounters as a way of figuring out to whom they were attracted as well as confirming or disconfirming the identity labels they used for themselves. Same-sex encounters could be offered as "proof" that one really was LGB+. Similarly, unsatisfying experiences with guys could serve as evidence that they were not attracted to guys. CONCLUSION: Sexual decision making among LGB+ girls is often driven by aspects of their sexual minority identity.
OBJECTIVE: To address the significant dearth of literature that examines how girls who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or who have another nonheterosexual identity (LGB+) decide when and with whom to have sex; and to explore why inexperienced LGB+ girls might have sex with girls or boys. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted 8 online, asynchronous, bulletin board-style focus groups with 160 adolescent girls 14-18 years of age. The transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis of each girls' responses to the questions. Analyses were focused on increasing our understanding of sexual health decision making among LGB+ teenage girls (eg, "What was the reason you had sex for the first time?"). Participants' responses reflected their day-to-day experiences and roles of cisgender LGB+ girls inside a dominant heteronormative social structure. RESULTS: Some LGB+ girls talked about the perception that LGB+ girls were presumed or expected to be hypersexual, and that they did not feel they could be accepted as LGB+ without being sexually active. Developmental aspects of identity were also salient: Girls considered or engaged in sexual encounters as a way of figuring out to whom they were attracted as well as confirming or disconfirming the identity labels they used for themselves. Same-sex encounters could be offered as "proof" that one really was LGB+. Similarly, unsatisfying experiences with guys could serve as evidence that they were not attracted to guys. CONCLUSION: Sexual decision making among LGB+ girls is often driven by aspects of their sexual minority identity.
Authors: Margaret Rosario; Heather L Corliss; Bethany G Everett; Sari L Reisner; S Bryn Austin; Francisco O Buchting; Michelle Birkett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Brittany M Charlton; Heather L Corliss; Stacey A Missmer; A Lindsay Frazier; Margaret Rosario; Jessica A Kahn; S Bryn Austin Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Brittany M Charlton; Heather L Corliss; Stacey A Missmer; Margaret Rosario; Donna Spiegelman; S Bryn Austin Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-06-22 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Laura Kann; Tim McManus; William A Harris; Shari L Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Barbara Queen; Richard Lowry; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Jemekia Thornton; Connie Lim; Denise Bradford; Yoshimi Yamakawa; Michelle Leon; Nancy Brener; Kathleen A Ethier Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2018-06-15
Authors: Michelle M Johns; Richard Lowry; Jack Andrzejewski; Lisa C Barrios; Zewditu Demissie; Timothy McManus; Catherine N Rasberry; Leah Robin; J Michael Underwood Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 17.586