S M Blake1, R Ledsky, T Lehman, C Goodenow, R Sawyer, T Hack. 1. George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, 2175 K St, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20037, USA. smblake1@aol.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study compared sexual risk behaviors of gay, lesbian, and bisexual (GLB) and heterosexual adolescents and evaluated associations between gay-sensitive HIV instruction and risk behaviors of GLB youths. METHODS: A random sample of high school students and HIV education teachers completed surveys. Self-reported risk behaviors of heterosexual and GLB adolescents were compared, with control for student and community demographic characteristics. Sexual risk behaviors of GLB youths in schools with and without gay-sensitive instruction were compared. RESULTS: GLB youths reported more substance use, high-risk sexual behaviors, suicidal thoughts or attempts, and personal safety issues than did heterosexual youths (P < .001). Among those who were sexually active, GLB youths reported more lifetime and recent sexual partners than did heterosexuals (P < .001), and more of them reported alcohol use before last sex (P < .01) and a history of pregnancy (P < .001). GLB youths in schools with gay-sensitive instruction reported fewer sexual partners, less recent sex, and less substance use before last sex than did GLB youths in other schools (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings document increased risk behaviors among GLB youths and demonstrate the potential benefits of providing gay-sensitive HIV instruction in schools.
OBJECTIVES: This study compared sexual risk behaviors of gay, lesbian, and bisexual (GLB) and heterosexual adolescents and evaluated associations between gay-sensitive HIV instruction and risk behaviors of GLB youths. METHODS: A random sample of high school students and HIV education teachers completed surveys. Self-reported risk behaviors of heterosexual and GLB adolescents were compared, with control for student and community demographic characteristics. Sexual risk behaviors of GLB youths in schools with and without gay-sensitive instruction were compared. RESULTS: GLB youths reported more substance use, high-risk sexual behaviors, suicidal thoughts or attempts, and personal safety issues than did heterosexual youths (P < .001). Among those who were sexually active, GLB youths reported more lifetime and recent sexual partners than did heterosexuals (P < .001), and more of them reported alcohol use before last sex (P < .01) and a history of pregnancy (P < .001). GLB youths in schools with gay-sensitive instruction reported fewer sexual partners, less recent sex, and less substance use before last sex than did GLB youths in other schools (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings document increased risk behaviors among GLB youths and demonstrate the potential benefits of providing gay-sensitive HIV instruction in schools.
Authors: L A Valleroy; D A MacKellar; J M Karon; D H Rosen; W McFarland; D A Shehan; S R Stoyanoff; M LaLota; D D Celentano; B A Koblin; H Thiede; M H Katz; L V Torian; R S Janssen Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-07-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jacob C Warren; M Isabel Fernández; Gary W Harper; Marco A Hidalgo; Omar B Jamil; Rodrigo Sebastián Torres Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2007-08-25
Authors: Miguel Muñoz-Laboy; Carmen Juana Yon Leau; Veena Sriram; Hannah Jean Weinstein; Ernesto Vasquez del Aquila; Richard Parker Journal: Cult Health Sex Date: 2009-04
Authors: Elizabeth A Wells; Kenta Asakura; Marilyn J Hoppe; Kimberly F Balsam; Diane M Morrison; Blair Beadnell Journal: Child Youth Serv Rev Date: 2012-11-27